namelesstavern.net

http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/26/justice/f ... index.html

An appellate court on Thursday ordered a new trial for a Florida woman who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for firing a gun to scare off her allegedly abusive husband, ruling that a jury was improperly instructed on self-defense.

Marissa Alexander's case will be retried because the jury was wrongly told that -- for her to claim self-defense -- she needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that her husband was about to seriously harm her, the appellate court said.

Rather, the appellate court pointed out, the prosecution had the burden to prove that Alexander herself was guilty of aggravated assault.

"Because the jury instructions on self-defense were fundamental error, we reverse" the conviction, a three-judge appellate panel said.

A jury convicted Alexander, 31, of aggravated assault in March after just 12 minutes of deliberation.

(see link for more)

great news

.

Even pro-2nd amendment people are wrongfully posting this without reading into why the psycho bitch should be imprisoned. It's sad.

It's also pretty lulzy to see it posted by anti-2nd amendment people equally as much as it is sad.

so many things make you sad, just stop reading and lie down and starve

why are you against this lady getting another trial?

Because she's a danger to herself, kids, family, and others.

She displayed that when she shot at her husband after having left the "imminent danger" (hint: there was none, because you can't walk away from "imminent danger") The very definition of imminent danger goes against "I can walk away, retrieve my weapon from my car, and then reenter the situation."

Also, a "warning shot" indoors is incredibly dangerous to the public, her children in the home, etc. It's reckless and stupid. She deserves the sentencing and everyone in her life is safer for it. She's demonstrated herself to be a violent woman on more than one occasion already. She shot a "warning shot" at the man's head. It wasn't in the air, or more importantly at the ground where it would have been more plausible and a fuck of a lot safer.

While she was out on bail, awaiting trial on her aggravated assault charges, Alexander was arrested for domestic battery against Gray.

Yeah, she's a saint and a great mother. Can't wait to get her out of jail...

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/07/19 ... -life-laws

Hate to agree with Harrison, if I'm reading the infoz correct...she shouldn't have reentered the situation

Harrison wrote:Because she's a danger to herself, kids, family, and others.

She displayed that when she shot at her husband after having left the "imminent danger" (hint: there was none, because you can't walk away from "imminent danger") The very definition of imminent danger goes against "I can walk away, retrieve my weapon from my car, and then reenter the situation."

Also, a "warning shot" indoors is incredibly dangerous to the public, her children in the home, etc. It's reckless and stupid. She deserves the sentencing and everyone in her life is safer for it. She's demonstrated herself to be a violent woman on more than one occasion already. She shot a "warning shot" at the man's head. It wasn't in the air, or more importantly at the ground where it would have been more plausible and a fuck of a lot safer.

While she was out on bail, awaiting trial on her aggravated assault charges, Alexander was arrested for domestic battery against Gray.

Yeah, she's a saint and a great mother. Can't wait to get her out of jail...

http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/07/19 ... -life-laws

I actually agree with this...

we've been over this

both her and the "victim" testified that she couldn't have left via the garage, and both her and the "victim" testified that she never aimed the gun at him

am i saying she is a saint? fuck no. am i even saying she should've got off scot-free? hell no, toss her in the clink for a year or even two, but gatdang 20 years is a gross injustice

You of all people, being militantly against second amendment rights, should want this crazy bitch in jail and never allowed near a weapon of any sort much less a firearm.

It's mind boggling how you think someone who has demonstrated on more than one occasion their propensity for violence and disregard for the safety of others shouldn't be in jail for as long as possible.

Harrison wrote:It's mind boggling how you think someone who has demonstrated on more than one occasion their propensity for violence and disregard for the safety of others shouldn't be in jail for as long as possible.

Reread this and think of how you feel about Zimmerman. You won't, because you are completely unable to perform even the most rudementary amount of self examination, but I like to try once a month to get through to you.

Zanchief wrote:

Harrison wrote:It's mind boggling how you think someone who has demonstrated on more than one occasion their propensity for violence and disregard for the safety of others shouldn't be in jail for as long as possible.

Reread this and think of how you feel about Zimmerman. You won't, because you are completely unable to perform even the most rudementary amount of self examination, but I like to try once a month to get through to you.

/golfclap

Even you people said this couldn't be compared to Zimmerman. You're going to try to do so now?

You really can't handle being wrong, can you?

She didn't shoot at anyone while being brutally mauled. Zero comparison. She left the situation, returned with a firearm, and shot at someone. 100% deserved sentencing.

If she had "fired a warning shot" while being pummeled you would have been able to limpwrist it in like that. But, sorry...you failed.

YAY you're the same.

Harrison wrote:Even you people said this couldn't be compared to Zimmerman. You're going to try to do so now?

You really can't handle being wrong, can you?

She didn't shoot at anyone while being brutally mauled. Zero comparison. She left the situation, returned with a firearm, and shot at someone. 100% deserved sentencing.

If she had "fired a warning shot" while being pummeled you would have been able to limpwrist it in like that. But, sorry...you failed.

With all of that being said, did she kill someone?

Relevance?

She shot at him, with the kid right next to him. Her being a bad shot isn't relevant.

(a shot at head level isn't a warning shot)

Yea man, she must not have been following police procedure on the proper conduct of a warning shot. Its like maybe she had no training and was just afraid for her life.

I guess because she entered a dangerous situation of her own accord she can't claim self defense (I'm leading you here cool guy, get those two neurons to connect the dots).

hurrdurr wrote:Yea man, she must not have been following police procedure on the proper conduct of a warning shot. Its like maybe she had no training and was just afraid for her life.

She had a permit for the gun.

http://www.usacarry.com/florida_conceal ... ation.html

Requirements:
All paperwork for your permit may be requested via mail for free:

http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/FORMS/ ... st790.html

1. You must be 21 to get a conceled carry permit.
2. Have a passport-style, color photograph made.
3. Get verification of training that satisfies the training requirement. NRA, DD-14, state training course, etc. . Persons serving in the United States Armed Forces may submit a copy of their Military ID Card to satisfy the training requirement.
4. Get certified copies of court documents relating to any criminal charges against you.
5. Take the fingerprint card to a local law enforcement agency and ask to be fingerprinted. In addition to providing fingerprinting services for the traditional “hard-card” format, electronic fingerprint devices are available at almost all 67 county sheriff’s offices in the state. Visit the Electronic Fingerprints Information page to learn how Live Scan fingerprinting saves processing time.* http://licgweb.doacs.state.fl.us/CWCS/e ... tinfo.html
6. Complete the application. Either print clearly with ink or type the information.
7. In the presence of a notary, sign application.**
8. Submit a check or money order for the license fee of $117

She is only saying it's a warning shot to get around the fact she shot at a man, missed, and now doesn't want to be painted the violent psychopath that she is. What she didn't realize is that a "warning shot" even if that's what she did, and it wasn't, is illegal in Florida and the classes and training she took to obtain her license to carry would have covered that in great detail.

Next stupid response?

I'm pretty sure shooting someone and killing them is also illegal. Circumstances mitigate the legality of those actions in some cases, don't they?

Also, your assumption that she is making this story up without a shred of evidence doesn't lend much credibility to your objectivity. Why do you think she simply missed him? Why would someone fire a single shot with the intent to kill them and not follow up with, say, a second shot? Oh believe what you want. Don't let logic stop that astute reasoning of yours.

Harrison wrote:She shot at him

false

Harrison wrote:brutally mauled

also false

Harrison wrote:a "warning shot" is illegal in Florida and the classes and training she took to obtain her license to carry would have covered that in great detail.

licensing classes are not accomplishing their purpose in florida? SHOCKER


the one time there's a valid argument to be made where a responsible licensed gun owner used a firearm for non-lethal self-defense and you take the stupid way out? guess i'd be lying if i acted surprised, plenty of precedent

So when you fire a warning shot at someone you fire it at face level in the direction of the person? Lawl.

Oh, he came in and destroyed my thread, time to rage out and ignore the facts.

keep singing and dancing, clown

that's what we keep you around for

Please continue to post more threads about a subject you know absolutely nothing about. It's worth the time to destroy it piece by piece and watch you rage.

god you're boring

go ahead and think whatever you want i don't care

bump, appellate court threw out the sentence today

on the same day Michael Dunn gets his well-deserved sentence handed to him

I don't think I've ever uttered these words and I'm not sure I ever will again, but I'm actually quite proud to call myself a Duval County resident today. Our justice system actually got it right.. twice.. in one day.. in one city.. in Florida.. a place that hasn't gotten a single damn thing right in years. I'm amazed.