Moderator: Dictators in Training
Drem wrote:this guy just sounds like that arse on TV that sold the miracle cures book. ever hear about his no-treatment, all-natural cure for cancer? nope, because it's bullshit
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote: And exactly what did you expect from it going in? Links to all the clinical trials and alllll the information he has on there? He hasnt even done a press release yet on it, theres not GOING to be much on there.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Maeya wrote:And then your head just aches from having your hair pulled so tight for so long...
--------------8< clip thread here 8<------------------
Gypsiyee wrote:--------------8< clip thread here 8<------------------
oh, I get it, I see what you did there.. because the 8< looks like scissors. oh.
Arlos wrote:Yes, generally the cells are collected from fetuses that have already been aborted.
So, no, I disagree that it will be used as an excuse to abort any fetuses that would not already have been aborted to begin with. I agree that making use of them for "parts" is indeed highly morbid, but leaving aside all questions of the morality of abortion in the first place, it seems to me to be in the same vein as carving up a grown dead person for usable organs to transplant into other people. The intent is to save lives, not destroy more of them.
Please, don't let this turn into another abortion debate. We know our positions on the matter, and we are not going to reconcile. Regardless of what you think of the morality of abortions in the first place, you must see there's a large moral difference between seeking more destruction, and making use of destruction to help life. That said, I can entirely understand the moral position of being against it all in general, since the source is something they find morally objectionable, I just don't happen to be in agreement.
-Arlos
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests