namelesstavern.net

by **Martrae** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:11 pm

Cool

by **Darcler** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:23 pm

He's excited about it. I told him "OMG NT IS FUCKING BROKEN FIXITFIXITFIXT". So now he has a project to work on a couple times a week when if he gets a chance to log on to pass the time.

/sigh this post made me miss him. He's in the field right now being a "bad guy" for a unit about to deploy ..... no phonecalls this week.

by **Martrae** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:33 pm

LOL...it's not broken. It just needs updated a bit.

by **Darcler** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 4:18 pm

I know, but if I said that, he would never really get around to doing it. I had to make it sound much worse.

by **Harrison** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:52 pm

Those image verifications are very easy to break, trust me.

Like the ones used on those file hosting networks. Laughable at best :wink:

by **Martrae** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 5:57 pm

I think you're talking about using them in a different context.

Using them here would prevent bots from automatically registering spam accounts since they can't 'read' the image. We'd still get a few spam accounts but they'd be from actual people manually typing their info in.

by **Harrison** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:30 pm

No, they can be automated as well is my point.

The image isn't magically hidden.

by **Martrae** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:15 pm

Depends on how it's set up.

by **Jay** » Wed Feb 21, 2007 7:16 pm

It probably won't prevent it entirely but it will make it less of a problem.

by **Darcler** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:07 pm

There's a chance he might log on this weekend when I go up there. He told me to bring the laptop so he could copy movies off it for his little dvd player thingy, he might log on, see whats up and fix things.

namelesstavern.net

Perhaps it is time to switch to manual verification?

Who is online