I guess I was used to the old R&F where editing ability was disabled. I always presumed the purpose was to prevent people from editing out stupid remarks that they were attacked for later on in the thread. Not a huge deal, but it seemed like a good idea then and seems like a good idea now.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
It's not like there's been a good rant/flame/debate on this board in the last year...
who cares if they edit their argument... it might actually provide some humor into an otherwise insipid debate.
I personally never edit my posts unless I've made some glaring typo - and normally then only if it changed the meaning of my sentence. For example leaving out a "not" so that the statement turns out to be the exact opposite of what I meant.