Zan, I'd say Portland is in worse shape than NY. At least the Knicks have *a few* expiring contracts and SOME semblance of team chemistry. Portland has... Rahim.
Malluas wrote:Power rankings at any site mean jack. They are alot of the times wrong.. last year it was Lakers #1 they lost, Kings #1 3 years ago Lost, Spurs #1 before lakers lost... detriot like #4 won the whole thing.
First... I think you are confused as to what the power rankings system means. It isn't a 'prediction' system. It's merely a "how teams are doing -
at the present time meter." And... it's usually pretty accurate. Dallas has never ranked higher than San Antonio... because they are 3-0 on us. Even when we were kicking ass all over the place, we still only peaked at #2. That doesn't mean that ESPN, Hoopshype, SI or NBA.com seriously thought for that one week that Dallas was going to finish #2 at the end of the season... it simply meant that we were ON A ROLL.
Second... all of your examples are stupid...
LA made it all the way to the finals... #1 was a pretty good guess.
Sac made it all the way to the conf finals. #1 was a pretty good guess.
SA only lost to the Conf champions and it took a MIRACLE shot to deflate them. #1 was a pretty good guess.
Nobody expected Detroit to win the finals... but #4 was still a pretty good guess. They were ON A ROLL.
Being ranked #1 doesn't mean, "OMG, THIS TEAM WILL WIN IT ALL!!!" it just means, "hey look, this team is on a roll... they are kicking ass."
My comment about Sac minus Bibby was referring to Sac 'now'. Sac was the deepest team in the league 2 years ago... Bibby could have sat on his ass and they still could have won 50 games. Not now.
But... far and away...
this was the gem of your post...
Malluas wrote:If the kings were healthy in 02 and 03 they would have won championships.. they weren't... Lakers were. spurs were.
Dallas doesn't have enough D
wait...
Sac could... wait, not could... WOULD have won championship
S!
but Dallas doesn't have enough D.
glass houses... stones...
