namelesstavern.net

by **Spliffs** » Wed Dec 07, 2005 7:01 am

Oh yeah - they beat an eagles team without McNabb, TO, Todd Pinkston, Lito Sheppard.

Brian Westbrook went out in what, the first quarter?

They've got three starters injured on the O-line, including a pro-bowler.

I mean seriously - the NT board trolls could put on some pads and beat the eagles right now.

We'd only win 35 to 3 though.
I wouldn't be real proud.

by **Lyion** » Wed Dec 07, 2005 7:07 am

The Eagles are still a talented and well coached team. Beating them on the road is still a nice feat, and certainly earned the Hags some props.

This Seahawks team is pretty close to last years, sans a few upgrades on D and Joe J. I still see Hasselback throwing that pick to Predator in the playoffs last year and it makes me think these guys are going to blow it in the playoffs.

by **Phlegm** » Wed Dec 07, 2005 8:33 am

Spliffs wrote:Oh yeah - they beat an eagles team without McNabb, TO, Todd Pinkston, Lito Sheppard.

Brian Westbrook went out in what, the first quarter?

They've got three starters injured on the O-line, including a pro-bowler.

I mean seriously - the NT board trolls could put on some pads and beat the eagles right now.

We'd only win 35 to 3 though.
I wouldn't be real proud.

Seatle has a better chance of representing the NFC in the Super Bowl than Dallas. I still think it will come down to the Seahawks and the Bears.

by **Arlos** » Wed Dec 07, 2005 12:22 pm

I wouldn't count out Carolina, if they can find a running game again.

-Arlos

by **Spliffs** » Thu Dec 08, 2005 3:47 am

Phlegm wrote:
Spliffs wrote:Oh yeah - they beat an eagles team without McNabb, TO, Todd Pinkston, Lito Sheppard.

Brian Westbrook went out in what, the first quarter?

They've got three starters injured on the O-line, including a pro-bowler.

I mean seriously - the NT board trolls could put on some pads and beat the eagles right now.

We'd only win 35 to 3 though.
I wouldn't be real proud.

Seatle has a better chance of representing the NFC in the Super Bowl than Dallas. I still think it will come down to the Seahawks and the Bears.

Well, Dallas probably isn't even going to make the playoffs at this point. It's amazing what the loss of one pro-bowl left tackle will do to you. That NYG pass rush wouldn't have been nearly as effective with a healthy Flozell Adams. Oh well, there's always next year!

That being said, Seattle still couldn't beat them at Texas Stadium.

Seattle will lose in the first round. That's all there is to it! I'm sorry!

I think Carolina is the top contender from the NFC. Chicago's D is just sick as hell, but unfortunately, they probably aren't going to be able to score any points against any playoff caliber teams defense.

by **Captain Insano** » Thu Dec 08, 2005 1:35 pm

42-0.. Oh man thats got to hurt. I don't care if Philly had their entire 4th string out there on the field they should have been able to get at least 3 points.

by **Captain Insano** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:44 pm

I don't agree with Diekans predictions... I think the Seahawks will continue to turn the rest of the league into trouser stains and dominate at the superbowl.

by **Lyion** » Tue Dec 13, 2005 2:08 pm

captain_insano wrote:I don't agree with Diekans predictions... I think the Seahawks will continue to turn the rest of the league into trouser stains and dominate at the superbowl.

They play Indy at home week after this one. If Indy has their starters in, we'll get a good gauge of how Seattle is against the best team in the league.

Seattle is a good team, but they'll have to earn their super bowl ticket, and aren't heavy favs against any strong team.

by **Captain Insano** » Wed Dec 14, 2005 12:40 am

Yah I know ; ) ... but godamn I haven't been this excited about football in like 15 years.

namelesstavern.net

Any chance of the Seahawks winning superbowl this year?

Who is online