Moderators: Mop, Dictators in Training
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Three months after claiming the Mavs conspired to keep him from playing in the NBA, forward Tariq Abdul-Wahad attended practice for the first time this season on Monday. A virtual non-entity in the team's plans for the past two seasons, Abdul-Wahad has passed the necessary physicals needed to resume on-court activity.
The Mavs had hoped to buy out the remaining three years on Abdul-Wahad's contract. Only half of his $7.3 million salary for next season is guaranteed. The guarantee is 25 percent on $7.9 for the following season.
The Mavs are interested in moving Abdul-Wahad. Though it's unlikely a team would gamble on his playing, a trading partner could be interested in the financial benefits of dealing for Abdul-Wahad. Though his salary cap figure is $15.2 million for the next two years, only $5.6 million has to be paid.
As for the claims Abdul-Wahad made against the team and coach Don Nelson on his French-language Web site in October, Mavs owner Mark Cuban said: "You have to ask him."
Abdul-Wahad declined comment after practice.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
DallasMorningNews wrote:Shaq's a softie, but don't call Mavs that
12:33 AM CST on Wednesday, February 2, 2005
The biggest man in the NBA looks down on the bald 9-year-old and smiles.
"What's up, baby?"
A few seconds is all it takes. Asks a few questions, signs the kid's shoe, tells him to stay away from the girls.
Shaquille O'Neal already knew James Faulkinbury's story because his agent told him about the cancer.
Shaq's got a soft spot for kids. Used to have one for the Mavericks, too, when they were just as soft.
Not anymore, they're not. Not with Erick Dampier's forearms in Shaq's kidneys.
Not with Damp under his skin.
"Dampier is soft," Shaq said, defiantly. "Quote it, underline it, tape it, send it to him."
You think maybe Shaq's read where Dampier rates himself the second-best center in the NBA?
"Don't ask me about that guy ever again," Shaq said.
Mavericks/NBA
Mavericks 109, Heat 104
Mavericks rally past Heat, 109-104
Photos
Tell us: Why are the Mavericks better defensively?
Sherrington: Shaq's a softie, but don't call Mavs that
Moore: Howard revs up Mavs
Dampier provides a boost
Box score
Mavericks-Hornets preview
Inside the Mavericks free e-mail newsletter:
Sign up | Archive
Mavericks Forum
More Mavericks
Never?
"You guys try to compare us and match up," he said, "but their defense is the same."
Hardly. A second victory over Miami, this one, 109-104, reveals that this isn't your usual Mavs' defense or offense.
And deep down, Shaq knows it. He knows the difference when Dampier is in the game as opposed to Shawn Bradley.
"Against Bradley," Shaq said, "every time I'm trying to dunk, dunk, dunk."
And against Dampier? He's holding his own.
Shaq had 25 points and 13 rebounds, but Dampier, still limping on a bum left knee, had 15 and 14.
Even better, he harassed Shaq in the game's closing minutes. Shaq got the ball twice and couldn't get close enough to do anything with it.
"Even though he had 25 points," Miami coach Stan Van Gundy said, "I thought they did a pretty good job on Shaquille."
No question about it. Shaq got his points, but he didn't have his way with the Mavs, and neither did the talented Heat.
Nice to see after the last few efforts, in which Avery Johnson questioned the club's mental approach, especially by its marquee players.
"I've kicked them," AJ said. "I've kicked myself. You should kick yourself around.
"And if you don't, that's a problem."
But that's what you got with the old Mavs. And that's the reason I wrote last summer that they needed to trade whatever they could to get Shaq.
He makes a difference immediately. Ask Mitch Kupchak, who kept Kobe Bryant and traded Shaq.
And how has that played out so far? Miami's the beast of the East, and Rudy Tomjanovich is thinking about quitting the Lakers.
Kupchak wasn't going to trade Shaq to the Mavs, and who can blame him? Who wants that monster looming over you in the same conference, ready to take it out on you before you're ankle deep in the playoffs?
Shaq wanted to play here. His wife wanted him to play here.
Mark Cuban did, too. But it didn't happen, and that's too bad.
Not that you don't like what's happening with the Mavs. Dirk Nowitzki's better, Josh Howard's better and Dampier's better than any three-headed center the Mavs have thrown out there.
Good enough to beat the Heat twice. But are they good enough to beat the Spurs?
Not from the looks of it right now. The West is a milder place without Shaq, but you still have to go through Tim Duncan, and that's no bargain.
Not if you don't have Shaq to barge your way through.
Here's some perspective for you: Did you see where Goodyear is paying Rip Hamilton to style his hair after one of their tire treads?
Peterbilt could get the Diesel to model one of its cabs.
He's still an unstoppable force, but the Mavericks worried him, no matter what he says.
And that's all anyone can really expect against the most dominant center of our generation.
One of the game's biggest sweethearts, too. Other agents heard the story of James Faulkinbury's cancer, but they made it hard for James' uncle, Chuck Cole, to arrange a meeting with their superstars.
"Not this guy," Cole said, nodding toward Shaq before the game. "Whatever you want. Whatever I can do."
Hey, Chuck: Ever wish Shaq was a Maverick?
"Oh, yeah," he said, almost shocked by the question.
"Don't you?"
Yes, Chuck, I do. But I don't miss him as much as I thought I would, and that's not something I figured to be writing anytime soon.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
DallasMorningNews wrote:Howard revs up Mavs
Forward returns from injury layoff with usual energetic effort
12:33 AM CST on Wednesday, February 2, 2005
The biggest play of the evening wasn't Dwyane Wade's spectacular, back-to-the-basket slam on a lob pass. It didn't come from Miami's Shaquille O'Neal or the Mavericks' Dirk Nowitzki.
It belonged to Josh Howard.
The Mavericks' second most important player couldn't match Wade point-for-point. That's not his game. His contributions are more subtle.
And every bit as significant.
On a night when Nowitzki "looked like a wet vegetable" – acting coach Avery Johnson's words, not ours – because of a sinus infection, the Mavericks needed a team effort to get past Miami. That's just what they got in this hard-fought 109-104 win.
Howard, as he has done so many times this season, led the way. He flew down the lane, went up in traffic and tipped in a miss by Erick Dampier with 1:30 left to give the Mavericks a three-point lead and the breathing room they needed to ease the pressure.
"Just staying aggressive," Howard said.
Wade scored 29 points. But Howard will tell you with pride that the Heat's leading scorer managed just three baskets against him: two jumpers and a layup.
The Miami guard started strong but was just 2-of-6 from the field in the final period. Wade launched two airballs in the final three minutes with Howard in his grille.
It's no coincidence that the Mavericks are 2-4 when the second-year forward doesn't play. Does Howard like to think that stat shows his importance?
"Just a little bit," Howard said before letting loose a big smile.
"I don't want to take full credit for that. But I know I love to play the game and I love to be around these guys."
The Mavericks missed this the previous three games when Howard sat with back spasms. He's the player that has pulled this team together on the offensive and defensive ends.
"Defensively, you can put him on the best player," Johnson said. "At the same time, you don't have to run plays for him. He still ends up scoring. That's a good situation to be in.
"You look up on the board, and he has 14 points and eight rebounds or 16 points and seven rebounds, and you didn't even really run a play for him."
You looked up on the board Tuesday and saw Howard finished with 11 points and five rebounds.
Again, stats tell only part of the story. It's not just what Howard does. It's what he allows Nowitzki to do. He's the rare small forward who complements the sport's most unusual power forward.
"The main thing is, he's a guy who doesn't need to take Dirk's space on the perimeter," Johnson said. "Most power forwards are inside players, so you're small forward has to be on the perimeter.
"Josh is just the opposite. He's a slasher, an inside player. Because of that, Dirk is free to roam a lot more on the perimeter.
"If Josh was an outside player, it wouldn't work. If Josh was a jump shooter, it wouldn't work. His skills really complement Dirk because they are total opposites."
Tuesday marked the first time since Dec. 14 that Howard, Marquis Daniels, Jerry Stackhouse and Michael Finley were available for the same game. Johnson praised the energy Howard and Daniels provided and said it helped keep Stackhouse fresh for a strong fourth quarter.
"This is good for us," Howard said. "Guys are coming back. It was good to have Marquis back.
"It was good to have me back."
The Mavericks wouldn't have won this game without him.
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests