Moderators: Mop, Dictators in Training
Diekan wrote:Need I explain?
Lyion wrote:I'm still trying to understand the Bledsoe deal with them. Splain that to me, Diek.
Diekan wrote:Lyion wrote:I'm still trying to understand the Bledsoe deal with them. Splain that to me, Diek.
Well, they're looking at the SB, and they don't/didn't believe that Runsloe could have or would have gotten them there.
They thought that bringing Losman in would eventually get them there.
Bledsoe is doing well at Dallas, but that's ONLY because he's got a much better O-line protecting him. He's old, he's slow, he's not mobile - he can pass, but only if he has a lot of time.
Spliffs wrote:The bills might have been better with Bledsoe, but he's beyond the years where he could lead a team to big things. Look at the Dallas vs. NY game. Fucked up several early passes, and didn't protect the football on NY's defensive touchdown. If it wasn't for Bledsoe, Dallas would have probably won that game.
Tikker wrote:Spliffs wrote:The bills might have been better with Bledsoe, but he's beyond the years where he could lead a team to big things. Look at the Dallas vs. NY game. Fucked up several early passes, and didn't protect the football on NY's defensive touchdown. If it wasn't for Bledsoe, Dallas would have probably won that game.
You're kidding, right?
a Defensive lineman beat the running back to the handoff, and that's his fault?
Diekan wrote:Well I'll not claim to be as wise as some of the NFL's head coaches - but - there's a reason the Patriots sacked Bledsoe and went with Brady... actually THREE good reasons. I'm actually quite suprised at Dallas' record this year. I'm almost amazed they have a winning record with Runslow at the helm...
But, in all fairness to Runslow I wonder how good ole Wonder Boy Manning would be behind a Bills' line... I wonder if he'd be 12 and 0...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests