Well... I remember last year when you basically said that Nash was the most overrated PG in the league... and this year he's an MVP candidate =p.
MOST league GMs prefer the pass-first point-guard over the shoot-first type. This is the reason so many people consider Kidd and Nash the top 2 guards in the game... and you are right, Kidd's defense puts him in a league of his own, far surpassing what Nash does. But then, and I'll quote the above article...
ESPN.com wrote:You're telling me that Bibby or Kidd wouldn't have been just as successful with Stoudemire, Marion, Johnson and Q on their team? Does anyone else find it depressing that the point guard position has fallen so dramatically over the years, it's practically cause for celebration when someone plays it correctly?
exactifuckingticafickally
I'm with a lot of Dallas fans in this... we LOVE Nash... LOVE what he's done in Phoenix, but he's simply doing his job. Any of the top 5 guards could have remade that team. Look what Baron Davis has done to Golden State. GOLDEN STATE of all teams. 1 man has made a world of difference in Oakland. Steve Francis, Stephon Marbury, Tony Parker, Kirk Hinrich... all of them would have fucking dynamite stats playing with those guys. I still love Nash, but... fuck... Shaq had better win this MVP race.
Anyway... Bibby is in the same boat as AI. I'm not going to get into the wonders of Iverson because I have a feeling you'll ignore it. People flip out over this guy simply because he fucking deserves it. He does it ALL man. I've seen him shoot 3s over Kevin fucking Garnett. 7'2" vs 5'11". That's like a 10 year old shooting over your average adult. That's fucked up.
I won't 'rank' point-guards simply because everyone brings different things to the teams. We love what Terry is doing just fine. Would Baron Davis have made similar contributions to Dallas if we somehow acquired him? A little bit, yes... but not on the whole. Kidd is really the only player that truly makes ANY team better. He honestly could make a huge improvement on all 30 teams. Yes, even Sacramento. Jason Kidd *should* be mentioned in the same breath as Magic Johnson when his career is finished as the greatest point-guards ever.
Last year you put Bibby over Nash, AI and Kidd. This year it's the same... but I PROMISE you that there isn't a single GM in the league that would pick Bibby over either Kidd or Iverson, and many would pick Nash as well. Iverson and Kidd are OBVIOUS hall-of-fame material. Bibby hasn't made that yet. You are comparing a pair of top TEN (of any position) players to a ''probably" top 25 guy. Apples and fucking oranges man.
Anyway...
a healthy Kings team would still stand little chance at anyone in the top 4 besides *maybe* the current Sonics. I can't even begin to tell you how pipe-dream fucked-up that idea is man. Dallas hasn't had this much momentum since the 87-88 season when L.A. *just* kept us out of the finals. I can't even see the banged-up Sacramento winning 1 game on us, a healthy one *might* push a 6 game series, but no fucking way ya'll would advance. I think that trading Webb was good for you
in the long run but the Kings are a fucking shadow of their former selves. You need to put down the hometeam crack-pipe and face reality.