Election results

Real Life Events.

Go off topic and I will break you!

Moderator: Dictators in Training

Postby Narrock » Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:20 pm

Zanchief wrote:
Narrock wrote:Harper is the best leader Canada has had in years.


I've never heard a stronger endorsement for his opposition.



FED - Harper's fortunes soaring in B.C.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Print this page | News Home | News Archives

(May 23, 2006) -
May 23, 2006 - Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government has soared in popularity to 43 per cent from 38, according to a new Ipsos Reid poll.

In B.C., the only province where the Tories lost substantial ground in the Jan. 23 election, they are in even better shape, sitting at 48 per cent in the May 16-18 survey for CanWest/Global on voting intentions. That's up five percentage points from two months ago and well ahead of the party's 37-per-cent showing in the January election.

The poll analysed voting intentions of 1,003 Canadian adults, including 121 British Columbians. The B.C. sample size has an 8.3-per-cent error margin, 19 times out of 20. The national sample has a 3.1-per-cent margin of error.

Harper, in B.C. this week for his second visit since becoming prime minister, has taken several steps to improve his party's image after losing five seats in the province while winning a minority government on the strength of gains largely in Ontario and Quebec.

Harper pushed aggressively and successfully for an agreement-in-principle with the U.S. to end the softwood lumber dispute, cancelled the unpopular privatization of the Ridley Terminals Crown corporation in Prince Rupert, and reached out to multicultural communities by striking a judicial inquiry into the 1985 Air India terrorist bombing and negotiating redress for victims of anti-Chinese immigration laws.



Let me know when you're ready to crawl out of your box and look around.
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Narrock
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 16679
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Folsom, CA

Postby numatu » Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:33 pm

Zanchief wrote:How is it that during 8 years of destroying the military you had close tabs on Bin Laden, but ONLY when Bush took office do you lost sight of him completely. I agree 100% in hindsight Clinton should have nuked Al-Qaeda to hell, but what with assassinations being illegal and Clinton being concerned with silly laws and what not, his hands were kinda tied in that regards. Bush isn't as concerned with the law, since he's clearly above it, and the general populous isn't the least bit concerned with holding him accountable for his actions.



The law you're talking about is actually an Executive Order signed by Ronald Reagan designed to put an end to assassinations of other heads of state. Bin Laden isn't an official head of state. Also, even if he were a head of state, a president can modify or rescind past executive orders.
numatu
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: MA

Previous

Return to Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests