Moderator: Dictators in Training
Ginzburgh wrote:Stop referencing the cop - yes, that was a retarded statement and if it's the worst thing he's ever seen he's clearly a traffic cop ><
Alcohol is legal, I'd have the same reaction if I saw someone handing a toddler a shot and having them drink it. It has positively nothing to do with the legality of it - it's a substance that messes with the mechanics of your brain and should not be handed to children, period. There's no justifying it, it's abuse.. it's wrong.
I'm not arguing that it's not wrong, I am arguing that the media is blowing it way out of proportion and based on your reaction, you're digging right in.
Oh, here, I googled Snoop Dogg arrest records, here is a small blurb
"Other Known Disturbances and Arrests:
1990s - Snoop Dog was arrested for possession of cocaine. Over the next three years he spent time in and out of prison.
July 1993 - Snoop was stopped for a traffic violation and a firearm was found by police while conducting a search of his car. In February 1997 he plead guilty to one count of being an ex-felon in possession of a handgun and was ordered to record three public service announcements, pay a $1,000 fine, and serve three years probation.
August 1993 - Snoop was charged for being an accomplice to the murder of Phillip Woldermarian. In February 1996, with the help of attorney Jonnie Cochran, Snoop was found not guilty of all charges but voluntary manslaughter, on which the jury deadlocked.
May 1998 - Snoop Doggy Dogg was arrested for misdemeanor marijuana possession. He was fined of $100, plus a $170 penalty assessment fee and a $100 payment to the Victim's Restitution Fund, for a total cost of $370.
October 2001 - Snoop was charged with possession of marijuana and possession of drug paraphernalia, after his tour bus was stopped and searched in Ohio. In May 2002 he pleaded no contest to the charge and was fined a total of $398.30 and a suspended 30-day jail sentence.
April 2003 - Snoop Doggy Dogg's bodyguard, McKinley Lee, was grazed by a bullet after unknown assailants showered Snoop Dog's car and other cars in his entourage with bullets.
August 2003 - Snoop was named in an affidavit claiming that he and the makers of the "Girls Gone Wild: Doggy Style" tape lured two underage girls to take their tops off for the camera by offering them marijuana and ecstasy. The suit was settled in July 2004."
Yep, he's a fine upstanding citizen
Oh and Kizz, don't be silly - he turned out fine, he's famous after all!!
Ginz, try to focus and not be an asshole resorting to personal insult.
Do you honestly think that perfect brain function leads you to being a felon? Ok sure, his brain isn't half developed, but he didn't 'turn out fine.' He's a drug addict - I hardly think that's 'fine' as far as brain function goes.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
However, it isn't like the pot you buy is regulated and I think you'd be shocked (unless you grow your own, or by direct from a grower) what mexicans (just a joke) put on that pot to make it grow better.
So are you generalizing? YOu would think after he hit it big and made enough to get out of the ghetto, he would stop acting like an idiot.
Ginzburgh wrote:Ginz, try to focus and not be an asshole resorting to personal insult.
Do you honestly think that perfect brain function leads you to being a felon? Ok sure, his brain isn't half developed, but he didn't 'turn out fine.' He's a drug addict - I hardly think that's 'fine' as far as brain function goes.
He's a fucking ganster rapper who was raised in the ghetto, you don't think they get into trouble with the law? It's not only commonplace it's expected. You're going to blame his breaking the law on brain damage caused by smoking pot when he was two?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
What does that have to do with anything? Seriously Ginz, you're trailing so far off the mark here.
He's smoked pot since he was a toddler, per your justification for why it's not that bad. He is now a drug addict. This is fact - you can't debate that, he does some form of substance daily, and is very open about it. A lot of his charges are drug related.. so, this isn't a matter of 'bad decisions' - this is a matter of you using a justification about how well he turned out in spite of him smoking weed since he was 4, overlooking the fact that he has a long criminal record involving drugs.
Gypsiyee wrote: I didn't say his legal problems stem from the fact that he smoked pot at a young age, I'm saying his legal problems stem from what he was exposed to - I'm saying these kids are exposed to something that they shouldn't be that could result in the same type of rap sheet for them in the future.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests