Tuggan wrote:xaoshaen wrote:Tuggan wrote:Of course not, but when you sign up as a reservist or to go into the actual army (or whatever) I would hope you have the sense to know theres a chance youre going to see combat in your time served. Youre a fool if you think otherwise, and deserve to be shipped over to die for something you dont agree with. Theres no draft, everyone volunteered to be where they are right now.
Ah, so the validity of the conflict is irrelevant? You just don't have any sympathy for the people that take up arms to defend their country? I'm sure the volunteers who served in World War Two would be glad to hear that you consider their sacrifices to be their just desserts.
just to make this easier for you to understand... here is the quote i was referring to.
I am not with Map on disrespecting people who died over there. Lots of them have absolutely no wish to be over there either. I mean, the army forced back officers who had been retired from the service for 10+ years and sent them over. They sent reservists and national guardsman, who never in a million years expected they would ever have to go fight in a war they may well not personally believe in.
That's odd, since your post that I quoted was a direct response to the questions posed in my post. If you really intended to respond to Arlos a second time, your post just doesn't make any sense. I'm curious as to what in Arlos' post you were referring to when you said "of course not"...
the men and women that join the armed forces to "help defend their country" arent the ones whining about having to do so. its the boys and girls that fell for the commercial on TV, or fed into the lies of their recruiter. now that they actually have to do something, theyre upset about it. well fuckem, thats my opinion at least.
Oddly, you didn't bother to differentiate between rationales for joining, or doesn't "
Every single person in Iraq" ring a bell? See, when you say "
Every single person in Iraq", it includes career officers, noncoms, and FNGs alike.