Diekan wrote:Yamori wrote:You are confusing private policies with legal policies Diekan.
They aren't demanding or forcing people to buy Ford cars: they have no power to make people buy their cars or force them to do so - they are saying who can and can't park on their property. It isn't a violation of their rights in the slightest - people don't have an inherent legal right to park on Ford's private property, even if they are employees.
No I understand exactly what the issue is - but I'm being realistic.
Ok, so let's say you're a single person working at Ford. How many cars does a single person typically own? One. So, if that car happens to be a non-Ford product you can't get to work, because you can't park in the fucking parking lot. That IS fucking rediculous.
Let's say you're married and you own two cars. What if one's a Honda and the other is an Isuzu... what then?
What... you're supposed to go out and BUY a fucking Ford so you can go to work?
Yes, again I understand they're not saying you must buy a Ford - but if you don't own one - you seem to be fucked.
I'm not disagreeing that it isn't a stupid and generally mean policy - it won't accomplish much because people don't and can't buy cars regularly enough for the policy to have much sway or practical impact. I was saying it in response to this:
Diekan wrote:I still say that neither a company, nor the government has any right to tell you what you can, cannot do, but sell, use - as long as it's legal.
I don't see this as an exercise of a company's rights - I see it as an attack on personal liberties. I don't care if Ford owns the parking lot or not. Sinse when is it illegal to buy a Toyota? Ford telling its employees they can only park piece of shit Fords in their parking lots is wrong, period.
That's a pretty clearly stated opinion that their selective parking is a legal (ie: civil liberties) matter rather than just an issue of them being obnoxious fuckwads.