Lueyen wrote:Drem wrote:America's full of a lot of stupid people and they cling on to their small, self-centered worlds with their lives.
Barack Obama wrote:You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are going to regenerate and they have not.
"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
Karl Marx wrote:Religious suffering is at the same time an expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the sentiment of a heartless world, and the soul of a soulless condition. It is the opium of the people.
Peas in a pod.
Drem wrote:so they vote in stupid douchebags like Bush and McCain who talk a fast one that appeals to their bizarre lifestyles that'll overpopulate and ruin the planet (christians, rich people, old people, pro-life, etc.,)
These people are overpopulating and ruing the planet? Man if they'd just quit clinging to their lives all would be well. Take note kids, that this is the same kind of thought process that drives communist revolutions that necessitate large scale bloodshed or starvation of people. Can't have that bizzarre lifestyle of wanting to actually live now can we.
Drem wrote:and then they get in office and just SPEND SPEND SPEND SPEND SPEND SPEND like there's no tomorrow.
No argument there in regards to the Republic party as of late in regards to fiscal conservatism you'd think most were Democrats.
Drem wrote:and when we get a president like Clinton, who actually helped the country earn money and repair our battered foreign appeal
Yep world image of us tends to improve when we give away military technology secrets, turn a blind eye to genocide and tie our military's hands so that we get our asses kicked by 3rd world thugs (in the event that we actually do anything when our embassies or soldiers are attacked, the rest of the world really loves us when we just ignore those and move along).
Drem wrote:, the people like mindia just focus on internsex.
Otherwise known as lying to a grand jury under oath.
Drem wrote:and then the types of people that should be instantly wiped clean from the country (racists, internalists, industrialists, socialites, insane patriots, etc.,) get to keep on keepin on.
I thought the first list of people that needed to roll over and die for your utopia society was missing some (although etc. tends to imply others). Although they aren't specifically stated on your lists, I suspect jews, and gays rank right up there as well.
Drem wrote:i'm tired of seeing the forward-thinking party get smashed by a bunch of reserved tards who can't or won't accept change
Yes they must roll over and die! Their existence and blight on society is crime enough they are enemy's of the state that must be put down.
Drem wrote:i mean honestly i'm just flabbergasted that anyone can look me straight in the eyes after watching the palin video (
viewtopic.php?f=32&t=19037&start=125) and tell me she's qualified to be the vice president of our country. what a fuckin joke! she can't even remember basic US history! an 11th grader in AP history could be a better vice president. but of course none of them will ever try to argue with your or defend her. they just say "I LOVE HER SO MUCH SHE'S SUCH A GREAT CHOICE." give me a break.
Hmm not too much different from your "forward-thinking party". Now I'm not saying that I disagree with your general qualification for VP in having a decent knowledge of US history but if you are going to apply that to Palin and say she is unqualified, then the same would go for Biden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTBZHf6WyG0Drem wrote:she's a typical example of a stupid american that thinks they can do anything and everything. now that she's actually being put on the spot, she's just failing miserably from one public appearance to the next. i bet in hindsight, she cries every night
Funny thing about stupid people who don't believe others assertions that there is something they can not accomplish, they tend to go on and accomplish great things. As a side note these types tend not to cry at night, but rest so they can pull themselves back up the next day.
Drem wrote:but we really aren't headed down a very good path to begin with..... i mean.... WE BUILT A WALL TO KEEP MEXICANS OUT............ that alone should be the end of our country's good name. this isn't fuckin China, we're not keeping out tribes of ravaging barbarians.
No walls have been built to keep Mexican's out. People are still able to immigrate or visit, all a wall does is to ensure they do so in a legal fashion, enforcing laws which were instituted for the purpose of national security. Unlike Canada, Mexico doesn't give a rats ass about who crosses it's border. When it comes to the issue of illegal aliens and labor, it is our responsibility to stop exploiting these people, in fact for the health of our society is must end. The absolute worst thing we could do in this regard is to follow the same path of the last 20 or so years where we build up a population pool of second class citizens... which is really just thinly masked slave labor.
Drem wrote:shit i bet we didn't even take the time to make it look good like the great wall. for fuck's sake. our priorities are so backwards
Having priorities backward is worrying more about how a wall looks rather then how well it functions.
On a final note Drem, I've been rather busy the last few days or I'd have responded to this and your previous post regarding me sooner. Unfortunately your assessment of my general habits was incorrect, and I don't have time to spend all day reading forums and formulating my arguments. I wondered why you chose to bash me on a personal level rather then stick to topics, I thought maybe you couldn't formulate a coherent argument until I saw this post. This post made it clear however, it's not that you can't formulate an argument, it's that your general thought process is so wacked that you have to mask it otherwise those crazy people with bazaar lifestyles see you for what you truly are, someone who ascribes to the beliefs of some of the worst social architects in modern history. Americans in general tend to reject out of hand these insidious ideals and thought processes, not because they are stupid but because they have seen all to clearly the eventual outcome of this type of rationalization. The fact of the matter is that people like you do far more to hurt actual forward thinking by attaching your brand of thought to it than the unwashed masses ever could.
So what'd that take, an hour and a half to write? Aww, you even gave me a youtube video to watch (that I'm not going to). I'm not going to respond that in-depth, because I'm doing chemistry homework and I don't like you very much, but I will say that you've misinterpreted most of what I said. I'll cite a couple of the stupidest examples:
"Having priorities backward is worrying more about how a wall looks rather then how well it functions."-Because you're too stubborn and you're looking—at every sentence in the post, I think—for an argument to win, you must've missed the implication that
I think we're wasting our time
period by building a wall for no reason whatsoever. If you don't want someone to attack you on a personal level, you should try understanding what they're actually saying before you try to talk shit about it.
"Yes they must roll over and die! Their existence and blight on society is crime enough they are enemy's of the state that must be put down."-First, it's spelled "enemies", and in my opinion, obviously, they are, because they're not helping anything. Sorry you don't feel that way. Maybe you should respond with more sarcasm next time and it'll really get your point across
My personal favorite was connecting what I said, a quote from Obama (which I completely agree with), and an obscure Karl Marx reference about religion, which I never mentioned in any way:
Drem wrote:America's full of a lot of stupid people and they cling on to their small, self-centered worlds with their lives.
Barack Obama wrote:You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are going to regenerate and they have not.
"And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
Karl Marx wrote:Religious suffering is at the same time an expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the sentiment of a heartless world, and the soul of a soulless condition. It is the opium of the people.
"Peas in a pod."-I don't know exactly how to respond to this, seeing as the Marx quote has nothing to do with what the other quotes are dealing with. When people say stuff like that it just summarizes everything I hate about politics today. It shows to me you have no critical thinking ability, and all you're able to do is pick apart paragraphs, put the sentences into your own context, and draw ridiculous correlations to try and make me feel bad about what I said. The next point you brought up fuels my reasoning:
"These people are overpopulating and ruing the planet? Man if they'd just quit clinging to their lives all would be well. Take note kids, that this is the same kind of thought process that drives communist revolutions that necessitate large scale bloodshed or starvation of people. Can't have that bizzarre lifestyle of wanting to actually live now can we."-This one's almost right, but only the first two sentences. The rest of it is just more sarcastic jargon, and expands on your previous assertion of me thinking like Marx
Anyways, I'll explain what I meant to you. Until America stops:
-going to Wal-Mart
-eating chemically-enhanced food
-drinking soda non-stop
-putting religion in politics
-interfering with a woman's right to choose
-driving their cars to locations that are a short 5-20 minute walk
-spending money on weapons and military like we actually need to
-driving their cars so much period
-hiding wisdom from its youth
-buying now and paying later
-letting its rich hoarde money that they don't put into their communities
-using cheap materials to temporarily substitute making it well to begin with
-being socially detatched
-sitting at computers for hours a day
-watching TV for hours a day
-trying to police the world
-etc.
-etc.....
then yes, the people that cause all of these things to occur on a frightengly regular basis are ruining the world, imo, and doing themselves huge disservices
It's funny to me that you think I'm a part of the problem, because I think people with your level of common sense epitomize it