750 years in prison too much?

Real Life Events.

Go off topic and I will break you!

Moderator: Dictators in Training

750 years in prison too much?

Postby Trielelvan » Tue May 08, 2007 8:44 pm

Not even close. HAH
Now, if only we could arrange to have what he did tattooed on his forehead before entering prison...

Burnsville man gets 750 years for creating child pornography

Pioneer Press wrote:A Burnsville man was sentenced to 750 years in prison for creating at least 29 pornographic images of prepubescent girls in his basement.

The tip-off that helped investigators put him away: a Brownie uniform in the background of one of his photographs.

The sentence handed down to Bruce W. Betcher in U.S. District Court on Monday is believed to be one of the longest in U.S. history for the manufacture and possession of child pornography.

In May 2006, Betcher, 53, was convicted after a weeklong jury trial on 24 counts of manufacturing child porn, one count of receipt of child porn and one count of possession of child porn.

In sentencing him Monday, Judge James M. Rosenbaum, chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Minneapolis, called Betcher's crime "an utterly unconscionable act," according to a statement from the U.S. attorney's office.

"There are some crimes for which there is no excuse," Rosenbaum said.

The 750-year sentence took even some seasoned defense attorneys and federal law enforcement officials aback. Authorities were attempting to determine if it was a new record for a child pornography case.

"Have I ever heard of a longer sentence in Minnesota? The answer is no. Nothing like that," said Earl Gray, a St. Paul attorney whose major practice is in federal court. "(Rosenbaum) is usually pretty fair."


And I'd just like to make sure this little gem was in here...
Gray said Betcher could appeal his sentence, but he said he was not likely to gain much sympathy from the federal appeals courts in Minnesota.

"If you appeal the sentence to the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, they'll probably give him 1,500 years," Gray said. "They're tougher than Rosenbaum."


I actually laughed out loud reading that.
HyPhY GhEtTo MaMi wrote:GeT ofF mAh OvaRiEz
User avatar
Trielelvan
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:11 pm
Location: Mosquito central of da gr8 white nort'

Postby Harrison » Tue May 08, 2007 8:51 pm

750 years for pictures...

Less than 15 for rape...
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Postby Trielelvan » Tue May 08, 2007 8:53 pm

Yep, that's fucked up ><
HyPhY GhEtTo MaMi wrote:GeT ofF mAh OvaRiEz
User avatar
Trielelvan
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:11 pm
Location: Mosquito central of da gr8 white nort'

Postby 10sun » Tue May 08, 2007 9:07 pm

I'm curious if it was even really child pornography rather than some girl who looked like a child?
User avatar
10sun
NT Drunkard
NT Drunkard
 
Posts: 9861
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Westwood, California

Postby The Kizzy » Tue May 08, 2007 11:09 pm

Well, at least its a start. This case can now set prescedence.
Zanchief wrote:
Harrison wrote:I'm not dead


Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
User avatar
The Kizzy
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 15193
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 9:48 pm
Location: In the closet with the ghosts

Postby Markarado » Tue May 08, 2007 11:59 pm

It will certainly make future possible offenders think twice before taking pics. Or these people are so insanely sick and twisted that they won't care. Or... are they people? Should we classify these people as animals/beasts? ... If we did we could.. you know.. put them down.
Markarado
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1802
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 2:55 am
Location: Penang, Malaysia

Postby kinghooter00 » Wed May 09, 2007 7:08 am

hmmmmmm, thats just rediculous... Just say you will be in jail the rest of your life. 750 yrs is kinda pointless...
Whats he gonna appeal anyways?? Get the sentence cut down to 300years??
jack ass. :lol:
User avatar
kinghooter00
Captain Google
Captain Google
 
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:02 pm
Location: Venice, Florida

Postby Lyion » Wed May 09, 2007 7:35 am

"In May 2006, Betcher, 53, was convicted after a weeklong jury trial on 24 counts of manufacturing child porn, one count of receipt of child porn and one count of possession of child porn."


Based on that quote, assuming it was making the videos and not just copying DVDs, I think he got off light.

Hopefully he'll be in general population when word leaks of his crime.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Postby Martrae » Wed May 09, 2007 7:53 am

10sun wrote:I'm curious if it was even really child pornography rather than some girl who looked like a child?


If you follow the link they said they traced him to 6-10 girls. One of them said emphatically he took the pics.
Inside each person lives two wolves. One is loyal, kind, respectful, humble and open to the mystery of life. The other is greedy, jealous, hateful, afraid and blind to the wonders of life. They are in battle for your spirit. The one who wins is the one you feed.
User avatar
Martrae
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 11962
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 9:46 am
Location: Georgia

Postby Lueyen » Wed May 09, 2007 9:12 am

The Kizzy wrote:Well, at least its a start. This case can now set prescedence.


I'm tired of seeing light to laughable sentences handed down for criminals that exploit children in a sexual manner.

Harrison wrote:750 years for pictures...

Less than 15 for rape...


Not that either crime is better or worse, but I do think the punishment should be more harsh when a child is the victim. That being said it wasn't just one count on him, I would think the sentence for 29 counts of rape would be more then 15 years.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Postby Scatillac » Wed May 09, 2007 12:18 pm

was there butsecks?
ohhhhhh rusteh.
User avatar
Scatillac
NT Froglok
NT Froglok
 
Posts: 302
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:19 pm
Location: Sarasota, FL

Postby Evermore » Wed May 09, 2007 12:21 pm

he should be peeing into a bag thru a tube where his dick was
For you
Image
User avatar
Evermore
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4368
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:46 am

Postby Xaiveir » Wed May 09, 2007 12:21 pm

Scatillac wrote:was there butsecks?



Hmmm previous thread of yours about bestiallity, and your perversions about it.

Now a thread about kids, and you pop in with butsecks.....


Kin of makes you wonder....
Last edited by Xaiveir on Wed May 09, 2007 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Why fight it, i am a Man Whore!
User avatar
Xaiveir
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4380
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:12 am
Location: Olympia, WA

Postby 10sun » Wed May 09, 2007 12:27 pm

What should be done about Child Beauty Pagents then?
User avatar
10sun
NT Drunkard
NT Drunkard
 
Posts: 9861
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Westwood, California

Postby ClakarEQ » Wed May 09, 2007 1:14 pm

10sun wrote:What should be done about Child Beauty Pagents then?
That there shouldn't be swimsuit competition would be a start.
ClakarEQ
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2080
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:46 pm

Postby Xaiveir » Wed May 09, 2007 1:22 pm

ClakarEQ wrote:
10sun wrote:What should be done about Child Beauty Pagents then?
That there shouldn't be swimsuit competition would be a start.



I would certainly agree with that.
Why fight it, i am a Man Whore!
User avatar
Xaiveir
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4380
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 12:12 am
Location: Olympia, WA

Postby kinghooter00 » Wed May 09, 2007 1:31 pm

definitely agreed
User avatar
kinghooter00
Captain Google
Captain Google
 
Posts: 1316
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:02 pm
Location: Venice, Florida

Postby Trielelvan » Sat May 12, 2007 8:34 pm

Evermore wrote:he should be peeing into a bag thru a tube where his dick was

:wub:
That's the *first* thing that comes to mind for all male sexual offenders who are convicted beyond the shadow of a doubt.
For both male and female offenders, I think it'd be pretty cool to also throw in being tied down, pour sugar water on their nether regions, and unleashing a couple hundred hordes of fire ants on them for a little while.
HyPhY GhEtTo MaMi wrote:GeT ofF mAh OvaRiEz
User avatar
Trielelvan
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:11 pm
Location: Mosquito central of da gr8 white nort'

Postby Yamori » Sat May 12, 2007 10:24 pm

To play the devil's advocate, castration for pedophiles is a bad idea due to the fact that children are VERY easy to manipulate into false testimony. I'd hate to see some innocent dude get their junk cut off. D:
-Yamori
AKA ~~Baron Boshie of the Nameless~~
User avatar
Yamori
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 5:02 pm

Postby 10sun » Sat May 12, 2007 10:34 pm

I could have sworn that even castrating pedophiles doesn't stop their impulses.
User avatar
10sun
NT Drunkard
NT Drunkard
 
Posts: 9861
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Westwood, California

Postby Trielelvan » Sun May 13, 2007 3:45 am

Yamori: that's why I said beyond the shadow of a doubt. I'm talking about cases where you find unquestionable proof (physical tearing, DNA, first hand eye witness, whatever, etc.).

10sun: correct, because it's not always necessarily a sexual impulse, and usually when the courts talk about castration, they are talking about chemical castration via drugs. However, I am talking about jagged, rusty, no anesthesia, fucked up razor sawing off your member after injecting said member with enough cocaine to ensure a hard on type castration. It may not kill their impulses, but I will bet they'll think twice before acting on those impulses again.
HyPhY GhEtTo MaMi wrote:GeT ofF mAh OvaRiEz
User avatar
Trielelvan
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:11 pm
Location: Mosquito central of da gr8 white nort'

Postby Evermore » Sun May 13, 2007 7:45 am

Trielelvan wrote:Yamori: that's why I said beyond the shadow of a doubt. I'm talking about cases where you find unquestionable proof (physical tearing, DNA, first hand eye witness, whatever, etc.).

10sun: correct, because it's not always necessarily a sexual impulse, and usually when the courts talk about castration, they are talking about chemical castration via drugs. However, I am talking about jagged, rusty, no anesthesia, fucked up razor sawing off your member after injecting said member with enough cocaine to ensure a hard on type castration. It may not kill their impulses, but I will bet they'll think twice before acting on those impulses again.



much <3 for triel.
For you
Image
User avatar
Evermore
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4368
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:46 am


Return to Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests