Kaemon wrote:250,000 -> 200,000 ->150,000. By the time all is said and done and with a Democratic congress and senate with no type of filabuster.
"Spreading the wealth" is going to have new meaning to all of us.
The message has gotten skewed on this 250 to 200 thing based on people twisting it, as always happens in politics. His message has been consistent. He always said those making *over* 250k will see increases. All he said about 200k is that those making under it will save money under his plan. Logically, that means those between 200 and 250 means it remains the same.
150k was Biden, and he's known for stumbling or not getting his message across very well. He's not a great speaker. The platform hasn't changed at all; all that's changed is the way people interpret the words or take them out of context for the sake of exciting press. To quote the actual platform, all they've ever said was "those making under 250 a year will not see their taxes increase one cent, and if you're a family making under 200, you'll see a tax cut." Nothing about tax breaks for everyone making under 250 at all.
any undecided left (which I can't see how they would be very many) are going to randomly pick at the last minute.
I think this is precisely why the production was a good move on the campaign's part - most of them are, indeed, going to pick at the last minute - his goal was to be the one who was fresh in their brains. It's psychology and marketing strategy, and not a bad move. He has the excess funds, why not? Most are decided by now, the ones that aren't haven't bothered to learn anything about either platform. The best way to snag those votes is to put yourself in their faces as often as possible, and to do it with a positive message certainly doesn't hurt.