Tom Daschle

Real Life Events.

Go off topic and I will break you!

Moderator: Dictators in Training

Tom Daschle

Postby Narrock » Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:06 pm

:owned:
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Narrock
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 16679
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Folsom, CA

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby mappatazee » Tue Feb 03, 2009 2:26 am

why did you start another thread about it when you already posted in the other one? accident?
User avatar
mappatazee
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2122
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:54 am
Location: au Eugene

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Lueyen » Tue Feb 03, 2009 8:06 am

Narrock are you referring to something besides tax evasion?
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Arlos » Tue Feb 03, 2009 9:42 am

And to be fair to the man, as soon as this all came up, he immediately payed up, including all penalties and interest. He even over-payed, as he based his liability as if he'd used the loaner car all the time instead of occasionally.

The idea that anyone else would have been sent to jail for what he did is, I think, a fallacious argument. The IRS rarely tries to send people to jail, unless you can show a long term pattern of constant evasion attempts, or you can show someone was hiding illegal income. For the most part, when they come after you, if you pay them, that's that. Look at Wesley Snipes, for example. He only went to court when he got nailed for back taxes and then told the IRS to piss up a rope when they came to him for payment. If he'd just shelled out the $$$, I doubt it would've ever even made the news.

This is not to say I condone tax cheating at all, mind you, just that I think the situation has been blown out of proportion to some extent. That's also not to say I think he's a great nominee, because I have my own concerns about him as well.

-Arlos
User avatar
Arlos
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:39 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby leah » Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:21 am

so is this back tax stuff the direct result of negligence on his part? like did he knowingly avoid paying these taxes? i heard something about it on NPR this morning when i was getting ready for work but i wasn't sure what it all meant.
lolz
User avatar
leah
Preggers!
Preggers!
 
Posts: 6815
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: nebraska

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby ClakarEQ » Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:42 am

Leah, I don't think that truth will ever be known but essentially he is saying he screwed up and since made good on it. The point however is, he of all people, should NOT have screwed up because it was pretty obvious it should have been paid.

The other issue with him IMO is he has been generously paid over the past few years and some of that compensation is from the organizations that he is now suppose to "police". So you've got a conflict of interest.

At the end of the day, this is really a pile of beans and bullshit because our previous administration had closer ties to corruption than what we're seeing here (Cheney for example).

However for a president that made the statements that Obama has made, IMO I'm sort of on the fence regarding this particular choice.
ClakarEQ
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2080
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:46 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Tossica » Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:46 am

Fuck Daschle.
User avatar
Tossica
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 12490
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:21 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Lueyen » Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:31 am

I'm less concerned with Daschle then I am with Timothy Geithner simply because of the position he was appointed to.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby ClakarEQ » Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:43 am

I'd be curious what percentage congresspeople would fail a financial audit though. It just seems that even while some of Obama's selections are questionable, either he has some really bad luck and poor vetting processes or a large chunk of congress, while we know are corrupt, find creative ways to "mistakenly" not pay taxes.

Isn't every congressperson's tax's public info? shouldn't it be?

EDIT
He's cooked, withdrew his nomination
ClakarEQ
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2080
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:46 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Lueyen » Tue Feb 03, 2009 11:55 am

Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby ClakarEQ » Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:00 pm

Yeah I didn't think Killefer was new news though. That link is to Dashle though, so that is 3 out of how many (?) withdrew because of tax issues.
ClakarEQ
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2080
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:46 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Lueyen » Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:03 pm

I thought it was only two, I believe Geithner has or will be confirmed.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby ClakarEQ » Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:05 pm

No, that Arizona guy, he was nominated before Daschle I thought and bowed out from tax and possible investigation / indictments
ClakarEQ
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2080
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:46 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby leah » Tue Feb 03, 2009 12:48 pm

methinks mister president needs some better vetters hehe
lolz
User avatar
leah
Preggers!
Preggers!
 
Posts: 6815
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: nebraska

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Lueyen » Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:00 pm

Raul Grijalva? I don't think he was ever actually nominated.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Arlos » Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:13 pm

No, he means Governor Richardson from New Mexico.

-Arlos
User avatar
Arlos
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:39 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Evermore » Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:35 pm

Mindia will take every opportunity for the next 4 yrs to bash anything and everything obama does.
For you
Image
User avatar
Evermore
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4368
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:46 am

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby ClakarEQ » Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:38 pm

Evermore wrote:Mindia will take every opportunity for the next 4 yrs to bash anything and everything obama does.

Yes but we all can say with some confidence that no matter how things go over the next 4 years, they can only be better than the last eight.

Arlos got the name right, i couldn't recall the detail.

So are congressfolk taxs public information? IMO it should be :)
ClakarEQ
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2080
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 3:46 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Diekan » Tue Feb 03, 2009 5:05 pm

leah wrote:so is this back tax stuff the direct result of negligence on his part? like did he knowingly avoid paying these taxes? i heard something about it on NPR this morning when i was getting ready for work but i wasn't sure what it all meant.


Most rich people don't file their own taxes... they have paid accountants to manage their money (balances, investments, taxes, etc). It IS possible he didn't know, but it's also possible he knew everything.
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Arlos » Tue Feb 03, 2009 5:25 pm

The biggest chunk of it is he was given use of a car and driver by someone that was a friend of his, and didn't report the use of the car as an income benefit, based on the cost it would have taken to hire the car and driver himself. That's the one he said he didn't know he was supposed to report as income.

If that's the case, I can understand it. You borrow something from a friend, you don't inform the IRS that you had the use of Device X for Y days and thus had income value equivalent to the cost of renting a Device X for that time period. At least, I don't, and I doubt any of you do either. :) I mean, if you borrow a pal's Xbox 360 for a week, do you put on your income tax forms income equal to the cost of renting a 360 from Blockbuster for a week? I think not. I suppose the reason he had to in his case is the value passed a certain threshold, and thus had to be reported.

If that was it, that'd be a pretty thin rope to hang him with, IMHO. I was actually far more concerned about the fees he'd earned from health care organizations for giving speeches to health care companies. Being familiar with the industry you're overseeing is certainly vital, but as we got driven home in a crystal clear fashion with many of Bush's appointments, being TOO close is a very very very bad idea.

-Arlos
User avatar
Arlos
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:39 pm

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Jennay » Wed Feb 04, 2009 12:46 am

The sad thing is that people are already starting to pin this on Obama like he's the one who owed taxes. At least he's not pretending it didn't happen or cover it up. Daschle stepped down, now we can move on, get someone else and be on with it. Also I think that if the government can peek into our lives, financial and otherwise, we should be able to keep an eye on them too. I like that Obama is all for keeping everything honest and out in the open like it should be. As much as he liked Daschle, its gotta be hard. Noone is perfect.
Jennay
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 2:54 am
Location: San Diego

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Evermore » Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:04 am

it seems the idiots trying to pin this on Obama are the Mindia's of the party...

so how much water will that cup actually hold?
For you
Image
User avatar
Evermore
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 4368
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:46 am

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Narrock » Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:04 am

What I find so utterly hilarious is that Obama promised "change!" and "We're gonna shake things up in Washington" and all his other retarded slogans during his campaign, and now that he's in office he's surrounding himself with criminals. All this in just 3 weeks. Pathetic.
“The more I study science the more I believe in God.” -- Albert Einstein
Narrock
NT Patron
NT Patron
 
Posts: 16679
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 11:54 pm
Location: Folsom, CA

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Gypsiyee » Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:38 am

there's more change involved than you care to recognize, though - don't be fooled into thinking that he's the first to have nominees in this situation. the change, here, is that it's out in the open. he's acknowledging it and taking care of it rather than sweeping the knowledge under the rug and keeping it locked in a vault deeming them unaccessible for 50 years like past administrations.

to be quite honest, I like having a president who acknowledges errors and rectifies them rather than one who falls under some delusion of valiant well-made decisions in the name of protection. to me, that this has come to light only strengthens my belief that he is the right man for the job. he's not excusing people because they're people he selected - he expects the same, if not higher, standards of his people that he expects from everyone else. that's a good quality in a leader.
"I think you may be confusing government running amok with government doing stuff you don't like. See, you're in the minority now. It's supposed to taste like a shit taco." - Jon Stewart
Image
User avatar
Gypsiyee
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 5777
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 1:48 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: Tom Daschle

Postby Eziekial » Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:03 am

I think the real issue around him for consideration in this position is not the tax issue. That's a distracting aside meant to switch the focus of attention. The really pink elephant is how can a man who just got over $5M plus all kinds of "gifts" from "friends" head a department that issues industry changing policy remain impartial and act in the best interest of the country? The conflict of interest is by far more troubling than the tax issue and that is what I think he was trying to keep from the spot-light but would have inevitably surfaced.
User avatar
Eziekial
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 3282
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 6:43 pm
Location: Florida

Next

Return to Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests