throwing Israel under the bus

Real Life Events.

Go off topic and I will break you!

Moderator: Dictators in Training

throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Lueyen » Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:57 pm

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090605/wl_mideast_afp/usmideastobama

"As Israel's friend, the United States I think has an obligation to just be honest with that friend about how important it is to achieve a two-state solution," Obama said.


The basic plan is to try and achieve peace through appeasement by concession of territory. I would draw a parallel between this and Neville Chamberlain but at least Chamberlain was negotiating directly with the aggressor. Obama is putting pressure on Mahmoud Abbas and asking Israel to negotiate with he and the Palestinian Authority. The problem is Abbas's can form an agreement with Israel, but that agreement won't need to be adhered to by the Islamic Jihad Movement in Palestine, Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, Hamas, Hezbola and other various anti Israel groups who have proven to operate independent of Abbas and the PA. If tomorrow Israel gave up land for the formation of a Palestinian state attacks by these groups who will not be satisfied by a two-state solution would continue.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Harrison » Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:18 am

If tomorrow Israel gave up land for the formation of a Palestinian state attacks by these groups who will not be satisfied by a two-state solution would continue.


This is the part that always got me. We know this to be true. They've said it themselves that nothing short of the destruction of Israel to be their goal. Yet people keep kowtowing to these shitbags.
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Naethyn » Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:20 am

Image

Who Gets U.S. Foreign Aid wrote:1. Israel $2.4 billion Virtually all of this money is used to buy weapons (up to 75% made in the U.S.). Beginning in 2009, the U.S. plans to give $30 billion over 10 years.
2. Egypt $1.7 billion $1.3 billion to buy weapons; $103 million for education; $74 million for health care; $45 million to promote civic participation and human rights.
3. Pakistan $798 million $330 million for security efforts, including military-equipment upgrades and border security; $20 million for infrastructure.
4. Jordan $688 million $326 million to fight terrorism and promote regional stability through equipment upgrades and training; $163 million cash payment to the Jordanian government.
5. Kenya $586 million $501 million to fight HIV/AIDS through drug treatment and abstinence education and to combat malaria; $15 million for agricultural development; $5.4 million for programs that promote government accountability.


http://www.parade.com/news/intelligence ... n-aid.html

Imagine the state you lived in (green) was slowly eroded away by a foreign invader.

Take a look at that list. Who supplies that foreign invader? US

Try to see it from the other side's view to understand where the problem truly comes from.
Maeya wrote:And then your head just aches from having your hair pulled so tight for so long...
User avatar
Naethyn
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2085
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 12:13 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Tuggan » Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:37 pm

:dunno: Would be a lot less tension in the Middle East if Israel didn't exist. Maybe we can throw them under the bus, then back it up just to make sure.
Tuggan
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 3900
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 3:12 am
Location: Michigan

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby 10sun » Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:13 pm

Lueyen wrote:If tomorrow Israel gave up land for the formation of a Palestinian state attacks by these groups who will not be satisfied by a two-state solution would continue.


However, support by the general populace for members of said groups would not be as strong, which would in turn help demolish the entire structure of the Palestinian operations. Right now, Palestinians are united because they all want something and they are denied that something.
User avatar
10sun
NT Drunkard
NT Drunkard
 
Posts: 9861
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Westwood, California

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Arlos » Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:22 pm

Not to mention, Israel already AGREED to stop all settlements a long time ago.

Go read just about any news story you can find, those settlements are viewed by basically the entire Arab world, not just the Palestinians as the single biggest impediment to peace. Remember, to create these settlements, they're mainly done by rolling bulldozers in, wiping out homes of palestinians who have been living there and done nothing wrong, and suddenly they're homeless with no recompense.

Hell, there's are several Arab countries that are, right now, willing to formalize normal diplomatic relations with Israel, including agreeing in full on Israel's right to exist, if Israel will agree to pull back to the 1967 boundaries, and work to give Palestinians their own sovereignity in Gaza and the West Bank, and Israel refuses.

Obviously the US needs to keep supporting Israel, but that doesn't mean we have to let them do anything they want to regardless of how it impacts the entire stability of the region.

-Arlos
User avatar
Arlos
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:39 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Tikker » Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:41 pm

Naethyn wrote:Imagine the state you lived in (green) was slowly eroded away by a foreign invader.

Take a look at that list. Who supplies that foreign invader? US

Try to see it from the other side's view to understand where the problem truly comes from.

you're not allowed to point out to fellow americans what the rest of the world already knows, shame on you
Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Harrison » Mon Jun 08, 2009 7:33 pm

Newsflash! Canada does too.
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Lueyen » Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:50 pm

Anyone question why the map Naethyn posted starts in 1946 when the area we are talking about has a historical background back to biblical times? The answer to that question is it's pure Palestinian propaganda bs.

Of course if we really want to go with the who was there first argument we'd sure want to start with the oldest maps at which point you'd never find even leading up to the present a nation called Palestine. You would however run across in the earliest maps nations called Judea and Samaria... guess who inhabited those?

The problem with the map you posted Naethyn is that it assumes all unsettled land controlled by Brittan to be "Palestinian" territory, which is completely inaccurate. Of course there have been people displaced, however that is not the complete fault of Israel. It is interesting to note that when talks about establishing Israel were in the works, a two state solution for the purposes of minimizing any clashes between peoples was proposed, that idea was flat out rejected by arab countries by enlarge. Of course within a day of Israel declaring it's independence as the last British forces withdrew Israel came under attack by the arab nations surrounding it. There are no officially verifiable numbers, but I have to wonder how many "Palestinians" fled the area to avoid the conflict, how many more fled areas that Israel captured and occupied as a result of that war. Of course later on you have the rise of the PLO, which is about the time the term "Palestinian" came into common usage as a way to try and legitimize the goals of the PLO. Of course leadership of the PLO had ties ideologically to those portions of the arab world that allied themselves with the axis powers in WWII with the express purpose of purging the Jews (Israel) from the middle east. I've posted pictures here in the past showing the Grand Mufti sitting beside Hitler, this very man was referred to by Yassar Arafat as Uncle (I've still never been able to determine if there was an actual blood relationship there, but it's clear Arafat respected him to a very high degree and with the PLO was seeking to further the same ideology, expulsion of the Jews from the Middle East). Of course the PLO later become the Palestinian national authority currently headed by Mahmoud Abbas, with whom Israel is supposed to deal in peace talks.

So does Abbas seek peace, is he a man looking for a peaceful solution rejecting the ideology and goals of the past parent organizations the PLO and Axis powers? As late as April of this year Abbas stated "I say this clearly: I do not accept the Jewish State, call it what you will" after which this picture was taken:

Image

There he is smiling at the true goal, which is notably not a two state solution. If you zoom in you'll see a map where Israel is distinctly absent replaced by a country called Palestine. The very same evil ideology that was compatible with Hitlers world views is still held today. There will be no peace until either Israel or this evil ideology is destroyed. Even the leader of the semi legitimate organization Israel is forced to deal with deep down doesn't want a peaceful solution.

In regards to foreign aid, anyone bitching about that is quite frankly like the school bully bitching that you gave your best friend lunch money instead of him. For fun look up how often each of the countries listed voted the same as the US in the UN. Israel votes the same as we do nearly 90 percent of the time when we are lucky to get 60 percent with other nations who receive our aid. Now you can look at that as either Israel being a lapdog of the U.S. or vice versa, or you can realize that we share many common values and interests and our foreign aid reflects that.

10sun - That sounds reasonable even if it's only speculation, but do you believe the same holds true for other organizations funded quietly behind the scenes by various anti-Israel governments? I don't think it does, in fact if Abbas continues Arafat's line of thought the day he signed the Oslo accords (and that is to take what they could get a piece at a time until eventually they could call on the help of other arab nations to finally crush Israel) or something similar he's counting on it not going that way where other nation funded jihad groups are concerned.

Arlos - the type of settling you are talking about is not what Israel is pushing for, it's settling for natural expansion in other areas where people are not displaced for the purposes of natural growth. Granted their claims seem to be unproven informal agreements with the Bush administration and they may not technically have a ground to stand on, however my issue is less with that and more with the fact that Obama hands down a specific ultimatum to Israel and a general "you have to do a better job" to Abbas. Couple that with the fact that Obama is simply echoing exactly what Abbas is demanding toward Israel but using a feather touch toward Abbas when it comes to concessions for Israel and it really just looks like Obama found Carters play book and decided to follow it. It makes me wonder how long it will be until rouge nations start taking American as hostage again... oh wait that's already happening isn't it. Yep your golden boy is running around kissing the asses of nations who don't much care for us, treating one of our staunchest allies like a second rate country. Nevermind that we are straining relations with our allies, nations that don't care for us will hate us less!

In the end Obama will end up with mud on his face, as he'll soon find out that Israel when faced with waning support from the US will do what is in it's best interest for survival. This approach will actually leave Israel less breathing room to stay it's hand, and actually end up forcing it to take action. In a nutshell location plays a huge factor. We can sit on our side of the pond and consider how our actions look to the world, Israel doesn't have that luxury, nearly all decisions that country makes are with it's survival and direct security in the balance.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Jay » Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:18 am

Can I get a tl;dr?
leah wrote:i am forever grateful to my gym teacher for drilling that skill into me during drivers' ed

leah wrote:isn't the only difference the length? i feel like it would take too long to smoke something that long, ha.
User avatar
Jay
Nappy Headed Ho
Nappy Headed Ho
 
Posts: 9103
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Kirkland, WA

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Lyion » Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:18 am

Obviously the Jew's have too much land and should return it to the Arabs.

Image

It's amazing that Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, etc have no place for the poor Palestinians.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Naethyn » Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:52 am

Dude, you can't be exiled for 2000 years and come back saying this is my land. It doesn't work like that.
Maeya wrote:And then your head just aches from having your hair pulled so tight for so long...
User avatar
Naethyn
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2085
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 12:13 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Arlos » Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:38 am

And yeah, obviously all those dirty palestinians who lived there for generations, and may have family farms or businesses that stretch back who knows how many generations have no rights and should be forced to move to some other country and live in exile forever, despite living in land areas left to them by the UN.

Obviously terrorist actions that in any way target civilians are abhorrent. But the fact that there are bad people on one side does *NOT* mean that any actions taken by the other are right, just and supportable.

The bitter irony in all of this is that had Rabin not been assassinated, I think the peace process would have been far far further along, and Israel's security would be in a far better place right now, as he had both the will and the personal gravitas to get things done that no one in power there since has. The fact he was gunned down by a right-wing extremist and fellow Israeli makes it all the more sickening.

-Arlos
User avatar
Arlos
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:39 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Lueyen » Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:55 am

Arafat -September 13, 1993 the same day he signed the Oslo Accords wrote:Since we cannot defeat Israel in war, we do this in stages. We take any and every territory that we can of Palestine, and establish sovereignty there, and we use it as a springboard to take more. When the time comes, we can get the Arab nations to join us for the final blow against Israel.


Not that I'm condoning the assassination, and we can play what if's forever, but it's clear that Arafat saw Rabin's "progress" as a vessel through which Israel would be destroyed.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby 10sun » Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:59 am

Naethyn wrote:Dude, you can't be exiled for 2000 years and come back saying this is my land. It doesn't work like that.


I was camping Frenzy, I just stepped out for a little while to get groceries!
User avatar
10sun
NT Drunkard
NT Drunkard
 
Posts: 9861
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 10:22 am
Location: Westwood, California

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Harrison » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:01 am

Naethyn wrote:Dude, you can't be exiled for 2000 years and come back saying this is my land. It doesn't work like that.


So time is a factor? What about 50 years? Or is that just some arbitrary number you chose because it's convenient this time?
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Harrison » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:10 am

Dude, you can't not own land for 50 years and come back saying you do. It doesn't work like that.
How do you like this spoiler, motherfucker? -Lyion
User avatar
Harrison
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 20323
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:13 am
Location: New Bedford, MA

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Naethyn » Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:34 pm

Honestly.....wtf lol
Maeya wrote:And then your head just aches from having your hair pulled so tight for so long...
User avatar
Naethyn
NT Traveller
NT Traveller
 
Posts: 2085
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 12:13 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby leah » Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:11 pm

Jay wrote:Can I get a tl;dr?



amen! (sorry lueyen, i tried . . . attention span of a gnat, i'm afraid!)
lolz
User avatar
leah
Preggers!
Preggers!
 
Posts: 6815
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2004 5:44 pm
Location: nebraska

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Lueyen » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:16 pm

leah wrote:
Jay wrote:Can I get a tl;dr?



amen! (sorry lueyen, i tried . . . attention span of a gnat, i'm afraid!)


Short version:

Those who officially represent the Palestinian plight exaggerate and/or lie about the issue, and could really care less about it. Their true goal is the elimination of Israel and ultimately at least the expulsion if not the death of Jews living there, for them Palestinian issue is only a vessel through which to accomplish that goal.

Obama is slamming our ally with specific ultimatums echoing the demands of Israels adversaries, and asking for vague concessions from those adversaries.
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.

Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
User avatar
Lueyen
Dictator in Training
Dictator in Training
 
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 2:57 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Arlos » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:11 am

I think you're overstating Obama's actions quite a bit, actually, and if you honestly think he in any way wants to see Israel wiped out or removed, you're quite literally insane. Did you miss the part of the speech where he talked about how unbreakable our alliance with Israel is, or how he slammed those who would deny Israel's right to exist or deny that the holocaust occurred?

All this sturm unt drang over Obama demanding that Israel actually live up to what they AGREED TO, regarding the stopping of all settlements within Palestinian territories, and acknowledging that the Palestinians have human rights and a right to their own nation is laughable. Yes, Obama was more publicly critical of Israel than any president in a long while. GOOD. As I said before, the fact that we are allies with Israel, and that should never change does NOT mean we have to give Israel carte blanche to do anything they like, and some of what they've done over the last few years has been STUPID.

The US would never allow any sort of arabic campaign to re-conquer Israel using an independent Palestine as a base to even get underway, much less succeed. You know it, I know it, and you can be damn sure everyone ELSE sane knows it too. As a result, I am having a hard time understanding why you're putting it forth as a potential scenario.

To put it in brief: Disagreements with an ally, and telling them to stop taking actions that are hurting their cause is nowhere near the same as "throwing them under the bus". Sorry.

-Arlos
User avatar
Arlos
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:39 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Lyion » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:19 am

Lueyen wrote:
Arafat -September 13, 1993 the same day he signed the Oslo Accords wrote:Since we cannot defeat Israel in war, we do this in stages. We take any and every territory that we can of Palestine, and establish sovereignty there, and we use it as a springboard to take more. When the time comes, we can get the Arab nations to join us for the final blow against Israel.


Not that I'm condoning the assassination, and we can play what if's forever, but it's clear that Arafat saw Rabin's "progress" as a vessel through which Israel would be destroyed.


It's interesting this has been their position the last 40 years, since the six day war.

Given the refusal of some Arab Nations to even recognize Israel, and their desire for the destruction of the 'Zionist' state, I think the Jews may have a point in not trusting them. This ignores the illegal treatment of Israel by the Arabs launching multiple wars, closing the Suez, and supporting terrorism.

It's also sad that so many blame Israel for the Palestinians not having a 'homeland'. This is simple BS. The Arabs in that region were part of the Ottoman empire pre WW1 who supported Germany. They lost and the region was divided by the allies. France and Germany carved them up into Jordan, Syria, and desired a Jewish state and created one. The British then left in 1948 and the Israeli's declared independence. At that time all the Arab countries around them declared war and attacked. That animosity has not subsided, especially given the US support of Israel.

It's important to note 'Palestinians' are just Arabs who lived in Palestine. Again, the area was divided into multiple states, most of which were Arab controlled, and with Israel setup to allow for the creation of a Jewish state, which was accelerated after the Holocaust. There is no reason the people there could not have lived in Jordan, Syria, or Lebanon. Except, of course, the leaders there won't let them and want to leverage them against Israel.

Obama is over his head and is doing what any poor leader does in trying to appeal to all sides to fix a problem. The issue is the Arabs want the problem to continue until Isreal is gone. The Israeli's have given and fought, and taken landed then handed it back in good faith while the Arabs do nothing but bide their time and continue to plan how to remove the Zionist state from the proper Arab lands.

This would be a good Ganzo discussion.
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Arlos » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:50 am

They could have lived somewhere else? Yeah, right, like someone who grew up in Dallas, say, would have no problem and be happy to relocate to Kentucky because the UN gave Texas to Mexico after we lost a war? Extreme example, I am aware, but if you don't think those people that lived in certain towns, cities, etc. didn't have roots there and would consider it the same kind of jarring dislocation that a texan forcibly repatriated to vermont would, you're kidding yourself. What about people who's family had owned a farm for generations? You think they could pick up at some other plot of land and have anything like the same roots or connection to it? I think not.

Again, as I repeatedly state, I am in no way arguing that the US should give up its alliance with Israel, should stop supporting its right to live in peace, etc. Nor am I denying that there are elements in the Arab world that want to see Israel wiped off the map. I do *NOT* however, think that that is the majority view any more, not after this long, and the history of stable relations between Israel and Egypt, for example, since the Camp David accords. Furthermore, I do believe that there IS a possibility for Israel to normalize relations with most of the region, problem children like Iran notwithstanding, but it needs to stop with stupidities like the settlements or that botched invasion of Lebanon that did nothing but make Israel look weak and give Hezbollah massive political capital.

I do have to laugh at your portrayal of Obama, though. Finally, FINALLY after 8 years we have a president who actually uses, you know, Diplomacy, and suddenly he's a weak leader for not doing the same "My way or the highway" crap as Bush? Please, give me a break. Good relations with the billion+ Muslim population of the world *IS* important to our security, and you're going to piss on him trying to improve them? Seriously, the man is Al Qaida's worst nightmare the more he does things like his Cairo speech, as it makes their normal recruiting spiel far more difficult. Again, if we want to win the war on terror, it's a matter of winning the MARKETING war in islamic countries.

-Arlos
User avatar
Arlos
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 12:39 pm

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby Lyion » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:04 am

Texas was part of Mexico and was lost to the US in a war. I doubt we'll give it back even if they still feel it is theirs, and likewise Israel shouldn't have to carve itself up because the Arabs in that region only own 95% of the land and want 98%.

Most of the Arabs there have roots that go far back. That does not give them entitlement to the land anymore than the Native American's are entitled to take over Kentucky.

Moving a few miles south to an Arab Country ain't exactly the end of the world. However, your argument is instead of them moving to Jordan, Lebanon, or Syria which was approportioned to the Arabs by the League of Nations/Allies they should carve up the one Democracy in the region and sole Jewish state <and a democracy to boot> because they are entitled to it because in 1750 they had a relative there?

I'd almost buy into your argument if there weren't so many decades of the Arabs lying to the Israeli's to try and work the political system for it's destruction. Everyone knows even if Israel divided their land in two and gave the better half to the Arabs today, they would still be clamoring for her destruction and launching missiles.

The simple truth is the Arabs are there because they are being leveraged against Israel.

Obama is Neville Chamberlain. Weakness is weakness, and is not respected, even if liberals love to be 'nice' to totalitarian governments for whatever reason.

I guess Obama's 20 year spiritual advisor disagrees with you, although I think some of the teacher's idea's are still there in his mind:

jeremiah Wright wrote:"Them Jews aren't going to let him talk to me. I told my baby daughter, that he'll talk to me in five years when he's a lame duck, or in eight years when he's out of office," Wright said, according to Virginia's Daily Press. "They will not let him ... talk to somebody who calls a spade what it is."
What saves a man is to take a step. Then another step.
C. S. Lewis
User avatar
Lyion
Admin Abuse Squad
Admin Abuse Squad
 
Posts: 14376
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 1:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: throwing Israel under the bus

Postby vonkaar » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:47 pm

Lyion wrote:Texas was part of Mexico and was lost to the US in a war.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Revolution
Gaazy wrote:Now vonk on the other hand, is one of the most self absorbed know it alls in my memory of this site. Ive always thought so, and I still cant understand why in gods name he is here
User avatar
vonkaar
Sexy Ass
Sexy Ass
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 9:03 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Next

Return to Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

cron