Moderator: Dictators in Training
Mindia wrote:NASA said the experiment does not pose any danger to Earth.
Like they'd really fess up to screwing something up lolz
The cosmic smash-up did not significantly alter the comet's orbit around the sun
If Nasa's calculations were off, even by a miniscule amount, they could possibly have set that comet on a dangerous trajectory
Arlos wrote:If Nasa's calculations were off, even by a miniscule amount, they could possibly have set that comet on a dangerous trajectory
Absolutely, completely, totally, unoquivically utterly inaccurate. Pardon me while I laugh derisively.
I'd suggest taking the word of someone who studied this stuff extensively, like Vonk or myself, as opposed to someone who gets his cosmology and physics from an old book of fables that has had the telephone game played with its contents by being translated a ton of times.
-Arlos
Arlos wrote:No, I'm saying that given the way the impact was done, the size of the impactor and its trajectory, along with the current orbital track of the comet, that there was no way to perturb its orbit such that it will become dangerous to the Earth. Yes, of course the impact altered the orbit of the comet, that's blindingly obvious to everyone.
However, what is COMPLETELY untrue is your claim that if "If Nasa's calculations were off, even by a miniscule amount" the comet could be put into an orbit dangerous to earth. This is so far from true as to be absolutely ludicrous and hilarious, but that you believe it is no surprise, given your previously displayed lack of knowledge when it comes to things scientific.
-Arlos
Mindia wrote:True, but look...The cosmic smash-up did not significantly alter the comet's orbit around the sun
If Nasa's calculations were off, even by a miniscule amount, they could possibly have set that comet on a dangerous trajectory, and they would probably keep it on the the "QT" for now at least.
'm surprised to see that you can't even acknowledge the fact that a small mathematical miscalculation by NASA/JPL can have catastrophic consequences.
Michael A'Hearn, a lead on the Deep Impact team wrote:They would need a far larger strike to ... turn a comet off-course
The camera of the probe ... took pictures right up to the final moments. The last image was taken three seconds before impact.
mappatazee wrote:Mindia wrote:True, but look...The cosmic smash-up did not significantly alter the comet's orbit around the sun
If Nasa's calculations were off, even by a miniscule amount, they could possibly have set that comet on a dangerous trajectory, and they would probably keep it on the the "QT" for now at least.
You're a fucking moron.
PS.
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/animation/PIA02125
Beelz wrote:oh my God... I'm actually surprised it was sombody from Russia to pull this off and not an American. It's like sueing terrorists for 6.4 trillion dollars because my beliefs that I am safe in the U.S. have been altered. I hope she gets gang-raped by ravaged sewer rats and spends the next 70 years in excruciating pain before she dies 1 minute after she is cured.
and Just wondering in Mindia's defense, isn't there a theory or something called the Butterfly Effect? Or would this have relevence here? I mean sure this deep impact that happened may have altered the course of the comet by such miniscule proportions that any effect would not be noticed for tens of thousands of years.
This next comment is just from common sense (or lack there-of) and grade school science classes. I'm assuming that this commet is traveling at base speed and it's direction is only altered by the gravitational pull of other planets, stars, etc. Now if this comet is spinning on all 3 dimensions, a slight impact in one spot could alter it a very miniscule amount, but in many many many years it could possibly be seen in it's orbital path change that occured from this impact compared to our data we have on our records now.
The funny thing would be if this comet gets blasted in the next 10 years by another comet and NASA having to go on the defense showing that it wasn't their fault.
Mindia wrote:Beelz wrote:oh my God... I'm actually surprised it was sombody from Russia to pull this off and not an American. It's like sueing terrorists for 6.4 trillion dollars because my beliefs that I am safe in the U.S. have been altered. I hope she gets gang-raped by ravaged sewer rats and spends the next 70 years in excruciating pain before she dies 1 minute after she is cured.
and Just wondering in Mindia's defense, isn't there a theory or something called the Butterfly Effect? Or would this have relevence here? I mean sure this deep impact that happened may have altered the course of the comet by such miniscule proportions that any effect would not be noticed for tens of thousands of years.
This next comment is just from common sense (or lack there-of) and grade school science classes. I'm assuming that this commet is traveling at base speed and it's direction is only altered by the gravitational pull of other planets, stars, etc. Now if this comet is spinning on all 3 dimensions, a slight impact in one spot could alter it a very miniscule amount, but in many many many years it could possibly be seen in it's orbital path change that occured from this impact compared to our data we have on our records now.
The funny thing would be if this comet gets blasted in the next 10 years by another comet and NASA having to go on the defense showing that it wasn't their fault.
Yes, you're absolutely correct Beelz. But what we're dealing with here are a bunch of immature liberal/atheist/evolutionists who can't stand the fact that a conservative Christian, like me, who likes country music and can't stand crappy bands like STOOL, knows quite a bit about such a wide array of topics. So, they have to resort to trolling and screwing up otherwise perfectly good threads, starting in on the personal attacks, labeling, and name calling, and so forth and so on. Just consider the source, and there's your answer.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests