by belfior » Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:37 pm
Is it me or is anyone else seeing no common ground between Jane Fonda & Michael moore? Theres a HUGEEEEEEEEE difference between the two. First off Michael Moore is not guilty of treason; he simply has conflicting beliefs. The same scenario with Sean Penn.
Jane Fonda confided WITH the VC and sapper teams and there is photographic evidence. Given that this happened during a time of war she could be punished by up to death I do believe(correct me if I'm wrong). If thats the case I really wish we would.
Statutes of limitations should have no meaning for the morale support she gave to those that would kill American Soldiers and in fact make many gold star mothers that had to bare watching her the past 35 years(I do believe she committed her crimes in 1967-69). Morale wins wars and kills more people than the actual people shooting the guns; Veitnam was an outstanding example of this.
If you give the enemy morale, you give the enemy a weapon. Jane Fonda gave the enemy morale and therefore is guilty. We could only hope that the law would in fact do it's part on this filthy piece of trash in Hollywood or whichever rich guy she recently banged her way to the top with.
Let us not judge someones opinions to harshly unless they act upon them(michael moore and other famous celebrities have not but jane fonda has); thats the way american law was setup.
I'm not for the Iraq war myself; however, treason is something that we must always deal harshly and swiftly with. Thirty-five years is way to long for justice to be served.
------
Punch yourself!
Fagarctik/Arctik 60 shm/war on tzvz
Arnay-> 40 RP Warhammer
Arctik-> 70 Priest WoW
Belfior -> 65 SK EQ