Moderator: Dictators in Training
Diabolik wrote:http://www.namelesstavern.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7616&highlight=peter+jennings
Mindia wrote:Diabolik wrote:http://www.namelesstavern.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7616&highlight=peter+jennings
What's your point? If you weren't a complete smacktard you'd know that I was just rattling some chains with that. 67 is way too young to die, and it was the cigarettes that killed him. Jennings was a good news anchor. I grew up watching him too.
Vivalicious wrote:Mindia wrote:Diabolik wrote:http://www.namelesstavern.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7616&highlight=peter+jennings
What's your point? If you weren't a complete smacktard you'd know that I was just rattling some chains with that. 67 is way too young to die, and it was the cigarettes that killed him. Jennings was a good news anchor. I grew up watching him too.
So, wait. You posted something that was designed to cause argument and dissention among an internet community?
Isn't that the definition of a troll? But then, you said that you never troll. Or if you do, it's because you are responding to somebody else's troll.
But that can't be the case here, because you started the topic. Hmmm.
Mindia wrote:Vivalicious wrote:Mindia wrote:Diabolik wrote:http://www.namelesstavern.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7616&highlight=peter+jennings
What's your point? If you weren't a complete smacktard you'd know that I was just rattling some chains with that. 67 is way too young to die, and it was the cigarettes that killed him. Jennings was a good news anchor. I grew up watching him too.
So, wait. You posted something that was designed to cause argument and dissention among an internet community?
Isn't that the definition of a troll? But then, you said that you never troll. Or if you do, it's because you are responding to somebody else's troll.
But that can't be the case here, because you started the topic. Hmmm.
Wow, are you gonna derail this thread too talking about whether I troll or not? You need to get a life. Have you no shame? Peter Jennings was a good anchor even though he would throw in some biased comments against the republican party, and for the democrats. That's what I didn't like about him. But that still does not discount the fact that Jennings was overall a good news anchor figurehead that a lot of us grew up with. When I said "it couldn't have happened to a better socialist" I was kidding. If you're too much of a dolt to figure that out maybe you should join another message board that caters to intellectually-challenged people such as yourself.
Mindia wrote:I was wrong obviously.
Mindia wrote:If you're too much of a dolt to figure that out maybe you should join another message board that caters to intellectually-challenged people such as yourself.
A Libertarian Talk Show Host wrote:You smokers -- you drug addicts out there -- don't forget to light up today on your way to work. After all, there's nothing quite like driving to work in that fresh morning air while filing your lungs with smoke. And when you and your smoking colleagues leave the office five times today to meet in your little leper colony outside to do your favorite drug, why don't you strike up a little conversation about Peter Jennings? Diagnosis to dead in four months. Just what are you going to be doing four months from now?
Gypsiyee wrote:Mindia wrote:If you're too much of a dolt to figure that out maybe you should join another message board that caters to intellectually-challenged people such as yourself.
NT caters to you, does it not? I mean, if NT can support your (lack of) intellect, surely any and everyone else is more than welcome to share their perspective.
There are few members of the media of Peter Jennings' caliber - Mart is right, too. 67 is so young now.. once upon a time, if you lived to be 67 you lived to a ripe old age - now, it's just so sad to see such a short life =\
Mindia wrote:Gypsiyee wrote:Mindia wrote:If you're too much of a dolt to figure that out maybe you should join another message board that caters to intellectually-challenged people such as yourself.
NT caters to you, does it not? I mean, if NT can support your (lack of) intellect, surely any and everyone else is more than welcome to share their perspective.
There are few members of the media of Peter Jennings' caliber - Mart is right, too. 67 is so young now.. once upon a time, if you lived to be 67 you lived to a ripe old age - now, it's just so sad to see such a short life =\
Would you care to agree to a truce? This bickering back and forth is kinda silly is it not? You say I'm offensive, yet you say things that I take as offensive too. You want to start over and fresh, clean slate? I'm game. Let me know if you are too.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests