Moderator: Dictators in Training
Ugzugz wrote:Mindia... you silly, clueless, little man....
Arlos wrote:Mindia, my last post had *NOTHING* to do with the Bible arguments. Though, I do find it amusing that you're calling Wikipidia biased, since that's where I got most of my information. You really think that Wikipidia is part of some grand Catholic Underground network? Anyway, that's neither here nor there. My last post, which you obviously failed to read, has to do with YOU making unfounded accusations and ad hominem attacks against my, and other people's characters.
Now, some more facts, since apparently I have to repeat them:
1) You called ME a liar. You have yet to demonstrate, anywhere, in any way, where I personally lied, in any form. You have thus accused me of being dishonest, which I flatly reject, and take great offense to. Since you have no proof of this allegation, it's obvious you ARE making a false accusation, ie, BEARING FALSE WITNESS, or, as your quote puts it, you attempted to "darken another man's name".
2) You called Gypsiee a slut. Last I checked, she's happily married, and yes, sleeps with her husband. Explain to me how a married woman sleeping with her husband equates to being a slut? Isn't that the absolute OPPOSITE of being a slut? Thus, again, you have BOURN FALSE WITNESS against her.
Now, whether or not you have any issue with violated that particular commandment is on your own conscience.
Now, in neither case have you apologized, despite multiple calls on my part for you to do so. In BOTH cases, you have violated the rules YOU FUCKING AGREED TO when you were unbanned. I expect either a full apology and retraction, with an admission you were wrong and out of line, or I work full time on getting you banned again, which shouldn't be hard, since your breaking of the conditions set forth to you for unbanning are clear as day for all to see.
Which is it going to be, Mindia?
-Arlos
Mindia wrote:I was wrong obviously.
Ugzugz wrote:So Mindia - only Christians are allowed an opinion on the historical figure who was Jesus of Nazareth? No one else has anything worthwhile to say about it? Regarded historians and archaeologists... their opinions don't mean anything, right?
Mindia wrote:I was wrong obviously.
Arlos wrote:OK, you had your chance to apologize to me and Gypsiee, you elected to further insult me. Well, I warned you. Here's to hoping your ban is soon. Formal complaints filed with board management.
And you'll let ME off the hook? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. That is hysterical. You've yet to offer ONE shred of evidence to back up your claims, or one single iota of explanation as to why the world's OLDEST bibles, transcribed from scrolls likely dating back to the 1st or 2nd century, DO have the apocryphal books (with the acception of Machabees, as I said). You keep claiming I'm brainwashed by Catholicism or some such, yet keep ignoring the fact I haven't been a Catholic in almost 20 years, nor did I ever have any discussions with anyone in the church about what books are and aren't in there and why.
In any case, I sincerely hope this is our last discussion, and that you're out on your ass soon. You won't be missed, not by anyone.
-Arlos
Mindia wrote:When did I call Gypsiyee a slut? How long ago was it, and what were the circumstances? Did she say something to offend me and what I said was a knee-jerk reaction? Tell the whole story next time, chump... not bits & pieces in an attempt to validate your weak and untruthful claims.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests