Harrison wrote:This isn't a discussion. This isn't intellectual debate.
It's people assaulting a belief system with a false sense of superiority. It's the very definition of bigotry.
...intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.
i don't necessarily think you're wrong, but i do think you're missing the underlying discussion. though some things have been said in this thread which are disrespectful (tikker, zanchief) to those who hold certain beliefs (ganzo), underneath all that the real discussion here is centered on the nature of the bible as a book. some serious questions have been raised, and none of them have been answered.
1) absent a "religious" book section, which section DOES the bible belong in? and why? what's the justification?
2) if you feel the bible is nonfiction, then mustn't the quran, the book of mormon, the BG, the tao te ching, etc all be nonfiction as well? after all, if you think YOUR holy book is nonfiction and all the rest are fiction, doesn't that pretty much fit the definition of bigotry you pasted word for word?
3) does calling it nonfiction make it nonfiction? who gets to decide? what if i start calling mary shelley's Frankenstein nonfiction? "how dare you put this in the fiction section, it's what i BELIEVE!"
4) what about those such as myself, who consider the bible to be fiction but try to follow its message anyway? why can't this be an option? if you really believe in your heart, why does it matter what section costco puts your holy book in?