My Complaint About Ugzug

[Tae-Bo]

Once again, I find it necessary to write in defense of myself and my beliefs. To get right down to it, when I'm through with Prof. Brinstar Q. Jackson, Esq., he'll think twice before attempting to make individuals indifferent to the survival of their families. Should we sit back and let him prepare the ground for an ever-more vicious and brutal campaign of terror, or should we give peace a chance? That choice sure sounds like a no-brainer to me. What I am getting at is this: If we're to effectively carry out our responsibilities and make a future for ourselves, we will first have to open minds instead of closing them. When one examines the ramifications of letting Prof. Jackson use priggism as a more destructive form of radicalism, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that if he honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. The world has a surplus of stupidity. With enough time and room, it would be easy to show why this must be true, but the clinching argument is simply that his ultimata will come back to bite us in the behind any day now. But there's the rub; his older philippics were rabid enough. His latest ones are truly beyond the pale.

Certain facts are clear. For instance, Prof. Jackson seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, petulant blackguards. I would like to put forth the possibility that he is calling for blind, impulsive action for the sake of action, for the sake of making himself feel good. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: If you can make any sense out his anal-retentive vaporings, then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. If Prof. Jackson doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere. Well, let's get our facts straight. As that last sentence suggests, every so often, you'll see him lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for seeking to sell otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idée fixe that he can change his sanctimonious ways, and vow never again to be so hypersensitive. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that his hangers-on's thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be.

It is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Prof. Jackson's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Why can't Prof. Jackson live among us in peace?" In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Why does Prof. Jackson think that phallocentrism and philistinism are identical concepts? I mean, I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like him let down ladders which the unpleasant, dastardly, and scary scramble to climb. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. His personal attacks are misleading and deceptive. If you don't believe me, see for yourself.

Prof. Jackson not only lies, but he brags about his lying to his provocateurs. If he believes that the few of us who complain regularly about his allegations are simply spoiling the party, then it's obvious why he thinks that his tricks provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything. Prof. Jackson is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.

He supports a wide variety of wheelings and dealings. Some are brassbound; others are bloody-minded. A few openly support frotteurism. Look at what's happened since he first ordered his co-conspirators to impose brutal new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of disrespectful drive for power: Views once considered complacent are now considered ordinary. Views once considered sinister are now considered perfectly normal. And the most contumelious of Prof. Jackson's views are now seen as gospel by legions of nit-picky malodorous-types of one sort or another. Prof. Jackson is out to make a mockery of the term "thyroparathyroidectomize". And when we play his game, we become accomplices.

Would we, as thinking people, believe dummkopfs who tried to tell us we're all soporific? I say "no." He has been trying for some time to convince people that his rejoinders are all sweetness and light. Don't believe his hype! Prof. Jackson has just been offering that line as a means to poke someone's eyes out.

All of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of his randy musings. They are not a cause; they are an effect. Prof. Jackson's flimflams have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life!

Prof. Jackson's humorless, naive imprecations are not something that endears him to me. Yes, I could add that it is difficult for many people to accept that he should stop playing verbal games and tell us what he really means, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that a quasi-improvident spirit is precisely the wrong spirit in which to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about Prof. Jackson's maneuvers. It's quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that if he wanted to, he could do the devil's work. He could foster suspicion -- if not hatred -- of "outsiders". And he could trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful. We must not allow Prof. Jackson to do any of these. I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Prof. Jackson's rotten, intransigent newsgroup postings, but what he insists are original hatchet jobs are nothing more than warmed-over versions of immoralism. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me take personal action and ring the bells of truth. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because Prof. Jackson coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his beliefs sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. The hate just keeps on coming. The reason is clear. Prof. Jackson is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore!

You've never heard him announce that he plans to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools? Well, Prof. Jackson has repeatedly enunciated such a plan, but in his typically convoluted way. For heaven's sake, he is not just stupid. He is unbelievably, astronomically stupid.

He can get away with lies (e.g., that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues), because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Prof. Jackson is lying. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it true that there's a distinction to be made here? When I say that he and his disciples are puppets of pusillanimous hedonists, I don't just mean that he wants to funnel significant amounts of money to benighted psychopaths, that he wants to treat people like lackluster simpletons, or that he wants to impair the practice of democracy. Sure, Prof. Jackson surely wants all that, but he also wants much more. He wants to call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place. Prof. Brinstar Q. Jackson, Esq. is a prime example of the ignorance, naivete, and plain old stupidity that he so adamantly criticizes. Since I don't have anything more to say on that subject, I'll politely get off my soapbox now.

Certain facts are clear. For instance, Prof. Jackson seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, petulant blackguards. I would like to put forth the possibility that he is calling for blind, impulsive action for the sake of action, for the sake of making himself feel good. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: If you can make any sense out his anal-retentive vaporings, then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. If Prof. Jackson doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere. Well, let's get our facts straight. As that last sentence suggests, every so often, you'll see him lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for seeking to sell otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idée fixe that he can change his sanctimonious ways, and vow never again to be so hypersensitive. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that his hangers-on's thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be.

It is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Prof. Jackson's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Why can't Prof. Jackson live among us in peace?" In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Why does Prof. Jackson think that phallocentrism and philistinism are identical concepts? I mean, I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like him let down ladders which the unpleasant, dastardly, and scary scramble to climb. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. His personal attacks are misleading and deceptive. If you don't believe me, see for yourself.

Prof. Jackson not only lies, but he brags about his lying to his provocateurs. If he believes that the few of us who complain regularly about his allegations are simply spoiling the party, then it's obvious why he thinks that his tricks provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything. Prof. Jackson is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.

He supports a wide variety of wheelings and dealings. Some are brassbound; others are bloody-minded. A few openly support frotteurism. Look at what's happened since he first ordered his co-conspirators to impose brutal new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of disrespectful drive for power: Views once considered complacent are now considered ordinary. Views once considered sinister are now considered perfectly normal. And the most contumelious of Prof. Jackson's views are now seen as gospel by legions of nit-picky malodorous-types of one sort or another. Prof. Jackson is out to make a mockery of the term "thyroparathyroidectomize". And when we play his game, we become accomplices.

Would we, as thinking people, believe dummkopfs who tried to tell us we're all soporific? I say "no." He has been trying for some time to convince people that his rejoinders are all sweetness and light. Don't believe his hype! Prof. Jackson has just been offering that line as a means to poke someone's eyes out.

All of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of his randy musings. They are not a cause; they are an effect. Prof. Jackson's flimflams have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life!

Prof. Jackson's humorless, naive imprecations are not something that endears him to me. Yes, I could add that it is difficult for many people to accept that he should stop playing verbal games and tell us what he really means, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that a quasi-improvident spirit is precisely the wrong spirit in which to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about Prof. Jackson's maneuvers. It's quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that if he wanted to, he could do the devil's work. He could foster suspicion -- if not hatred -- of "outsiders". And he could trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful. We must not allow Prof. Jackson to do any of these. I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Prof. Jackson's rotten, intransigent newsgroup postings, but what he insists are original hatchet jobs are nothing more than warmed-over versions of immoralism. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me take personal action and ring the bells of truth. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because Prof. Jackson coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his beliefs sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. The hate just keeps on coming. The reason is clear. Prof. Jackson is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore!

You've never heard him announce that he plans to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools? Well, Prof. Jackson has repeatedly enunciated such a plan, but in his typically convoluted way. For heaven's sake, he is not just stupid. He is unbelievably, astronomically stupid.

He can get away with lies (e.g., that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues), because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Prof. Jackson is lying. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it true that there's a distinction to be made here? When I say that he and his disciples are puppets of pusillanimous hedonists, I don't just mean that he wants to funnel significant amounts of money to benighted psychopaths, that he wants to treat people like lackluster simpletons, or that he wants to impair the practice of democracy. Sure, Prof. Jackson surely wants all that, but he also wants much more. He wants to call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place. Prof. Brinstar Q. Jackson, Esq. is a prime example of the ignorance, naivete, and plain old stupidity that he so adamantly criticizes. Since I don't have anything more to say on that subject, I'll politely get off my soapbox now.

Certain facts are clear. For instance, Prof. Jackson seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, petulant blackguards. I would like to put forth the possibility that he is calling for blind, impulsive action for the sake of action, for the sake of making himself feel good. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: If you can make any sense out his anal-retentive vaporings, then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. If Prof. Jackson doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere. Well, let's get our facts straight. As that last sentence suggests, every so often, you'll see him lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for seeking to sell otherwise perfectly reasonable people the idée fixe that he can change his sanctimonious ways, and vow never again to be so hypersensitive. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that his hangers-on's thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be.

It is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Prof. Jackson's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Why can't Prof. Jackson live among us in peace?" In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: Why does Prof. Jackson think that phallocentrism and philistinism are identical concepts? I mean, I believe I have finally figured out what makes people like him let down ladders which the unpleasant, dastardly, and scary scramble to climb. It appears to be a combination of an overactive mind, lack of common sense, assurance of one's own moral propriety, and a total lack of exposure to the real world. His personal attacks are misleading and deceptive. If you don't believe me, see for yourself.

Prof. Jackson not only lies, but he brags about his lying to his provocateurs. If he believes that the few of us who complain regularly about his allegations are simply spoiling the party, then it's obvious why he thinks that his tricks provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything. Prof. Jackson is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks.

He supports a wide variety of wheelings and dealings. Some are brassbound; others are bloody-minded. A few openly support frotteurism. Look at what's happened since he first ordered his co-conspirators to impose brutal new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of disrespectful drive for power: Views once considered complacent are now considered ordinary. Views once considered sinister are now considered perfectly normal. And the most contumelious of Prof. Jackson's views are now seen as gospel by legions of nit-picky malodorous-types of one sort or another. Prof. Jackson is out to make a mockery of the term "thyroparathyroidectomize". And when we play his game, we become accomplices.

Would we, as thinking people, believe dummkopfs who tried to tell us we're all soporific? I say "no." He has been trying for some time to convince people that his rejoinders are all sweetness and light. Don't believe his hype! Prof. Jackson has just been offering that line as a means to poke someone's eyes out.

All of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of his randy musings. They are not a cause; they are an effect. Prof. Jackson's flimflams have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life!

Prof. Jackson's humorless, naive imprecations are not something that endears him to me. Yes, I could add that it is difficult for many people to accept that he should stop playing verbal games and tell us what he really means, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that a quasi-improvident spirit is precisely the wrong spirit in which to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about Prof. Jackson's maneuvers. It's quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that if he wanted to, he could do the devil's work. He could foster suspicion -- if not hatred -- of "outsiders". And he could trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful. We must not allow Prof. Jackson to do any of these. I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Prof. Jackson's rotten, intransigent newsgroup postings, but what he insists are original hatchet jobs are nothing more than warmed-over versions of immoralism. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me take personal action and ring the bells of truth. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because Prof. Jackson coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his beliefs sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. The hate just keeps on coming. The reason is clear. Prof. Jackson is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore!

You've never heard him announce that he plans to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools? Well, Prof. Jackson has repeatedly enunciated such a plan, but in his typically convoluted way. For heaven's sake, he is not just stupid. He is unbelievably, astronomically stupid.

He can get away with lies (e.g., that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues), because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Prof. Jackson is lying. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it true that there's a distinction to be made here? When I say that he and his disciples are puppets of pusillanimous hedonists, I don't just mean that he wants to funnel significant amounts of money to benighted psychopaths, that he wants to treat people like lackluster simpletons, or that he wants to impair the practice of democracy. Sure, Prof. Jackson surely wants all that, but he also wants much more. He wants to call for a return to that which wasn't particularly good in the first place. Prof. Brinstar Q. Jackson, Esq. is a prime example of the ignorance, naivete, and plain old stupidity that he so adamantly criticizes. Since I don't have anything more to say on that subject, I'll politely get off my soapbox now.

[brinstar]

Time cannot change Mr. Brinstar's behavior. Time merely enlarges the field in which Mr. Brinstar can, with ever-increasing intensity and thoroughness, provoke terrible, total, universal, and merciless destruction.

i agree

[Skraggz]

Holy Fuck! I dont even think the Sony User Agreement has as many words as that Reply by D. Duck! to much reading Im fucking going back to porn

[Aatrex]

I hope no one is retarded enough to think they actually wrote that.

[Aatrex]

ps can I get a woosh if *everyone* in this thread alrady knew the absolute obvious that I pointed out?

[Drem]

We see a clearly visible organ of some sort, perhaps a liver or a crude representation of the genitals, but it is gray and all dried up. Above it we see a gigantic fly patiently consuming what's left of this poor soul's innards. Further up, we see that the flesh of the face is gone and replaced with the mortal red of blood, or perhaps charred in some horrendous fire. Whatever ate away the flesh also took the eyelids, leaving the eyeballs as bulbous shapes, staring epically because they lack any means of hiding. Like suns that never set, they peer endlessly forward incapable of ever truly knowing night. The limbs, those tiny useless stumps, open up as if to accept a hug, completely oblivious to the notion that no one could ever bring themselves to hug this beast. But just as no one could ever love this monstrosity, it can never know love itself. There is no heart in the cupboard, only the hunger of the fly.

[Eleril]

Metranon made me get out my dictionary and thesaurus (SP? :P)

I took calculus 2 in junior college and all these adults were in my class asking all these super smart questions that I had no idea what they were talking about. I just listened to what the prof taught on the board and read the pages she assigned. The 1st test came back and I got 114 of 117 with the extra credit, the highest score in the class and all the big people with their big words either got "C's" or failed.... :shock:

I am not sure the point of that but it must have to do with something. :P

[Derrict]

I hope no one is retarded enough to think they actually wrote that.

Scripted over to hacker talk to spice it up -
once again, i find it necessary to writ3 In Defensd3 of myself and my beleifz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~ TO GT RIGHT DOWN TO IT, WHEN IM THORUGH W1YTH RPOF, brinstar q!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! jaX0rson ,wesq~~~~ he'll think twuice ef0re attemptng to m4kew individuals indiffarent to tehh survicval oF trhir amile1s!!!!!!~~~ ololol!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~ THEIR IS A R4TIOD ONT RIPE ME oFF SSHOUULD WES ITT BAX0R AND LET HINM PR3PARE TTHE GROUND FR OAN EVER-MROE VICIOUS A|\|D BRUTAL CAMPASIGN FO TER0ERR, RO SHOULD WE GIVE PEACE A CHANCE?????????????? rthat choice sure sounds liek a no--brainer t ome. what i am gett1ng at is this:i f we're t0 edffectivelyc arry ouT our resoonmsibiliteiz 4nD makea fUture for ourselves, we will first Hae ot open miunds instea dof closing tehm!!!!!!!!111~~~~~~~ \\\\////\\\\////hen one ex4mi|\|ez th eraimgficationds opf letting prof jaSX0Rosn use piggism 4z a more destructive from of radicalims, one fidns a prepondtrande of evidence leading toteh conc7usiont hat if he ho|\|etsly beleives that os/\/\eo f my p0ina r not alid, i wou7d loVe to get some specific feredbaX0r from him~ the worlda hs a srplus of stubidity!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~~ OLOLOLOLLOLOLOL wIth enough time and orom, it woUld be easy to show whY this must be true, but teh clinchinmg agrument si simply tthatr his uiltimat4 wil7 come baX0r to bite uss iN tde beH1nd nay day now bUT TH3RES TEH RUb;; HIS O7DER PHILIPPICD W3RE RABID ENOGUH. his latest ones aer turly b3yond teh pale. cERTAIN FAcTS ARE LCEAAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~ u sucdk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 FOr INDTSANCE, PORF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 AJX0RSON SeEKS SCLAPEG0ATZ FR OHSI OWN SHORTCOMINGZ BY BLAMING TEH EASEIST TRGEDT HE CANF NIE, TAHT 1S, P3TU7ATN BLAX0RGUArDZ i WOULD L1EK TO PUT GFROtH RTEH POSS1BILITY THAT H3 SI CXAL7ING FRO BLIND, IMPUSLIV3 ACTOON FOR THE SAKE PFA CTiON, FOR TEH sAKE OF MAKING HIMSLF FEeL GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~ LET ME REC4P THAT FRO YO, B3CUAZ IT RREALLY SI XETRARODIN4RIL IMPROTANT: IF YPOU CAN MAKE ANY SE|\|SE OUT HIS ANAL-REETNTIVE VAPOORINGZ, THEN YOU MUS HAVE OTTEN HIHER MARKZ IN SCDHOOL THAN I DID if p0rf// i own joo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~~~~ j4X0ron doesn"t liek it here, then p3rhaps he should goi rlsEwherr3 w3ll, let"S g3t our fact sstra1ght AZ THAT LATS SENTENC3 SUGGSETz, EVCERY S OOFTE|\|, You"L7 SE3H IM ALMEnY, FLOG HISEL,, CRY MEA CULPA FR0 SEEKING TO SEL7 OTHER\\\\////\\\\////IDSE PARFECTLY REASON4BEL E0OEDZ THe DIéEF OIXE THAT HE CAN CH4NGE HIS SANCTIM0NIOUS WAYS, AQND VOW NEV4R AGAIN TO B ESO HYPESRENSITIVWE.. ASD7Y, HE ASLwAYZ REVERTs TO HIS 0LD BEHAViRo IMMED18LY AFT3RWARDS, MAKING ME THINK THAT HIS HNAEGRS--O|\|S THINKINFG S1 FENCED UN BY MANy DCONSTRAINTS. THEIr MINDS R NOt FREE BECAUSE THEY DR NMOT BE.. IT 1S MOR THAN A PRUELY HISTORICAL QUESTIO|\| TO ASK, 'HOW DID PR0F!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~ JAXORSON'S RIEFGN OF TErROR SRTART!?!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!? llololo.. " oRE BEn TREH MROE uRg3NT UQESTION, HOW MIGHT IT END!?!?!?!???!?!??!? ooloololo~~~ olololololoolololol!!!!!1 olololollololol~~~~ hack the plannedt ... NO, WEMUST ASK, 'HYC AN'TR P0R!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~ jaX0rsonl Ive among yus inp ade!?!?!?!?!??!? IMN CLASSIC SOPH1SY FASHION, I AK ANTOHER QUEST10N NI REP7Y:WHY DOEZ PORF... j4X0rson th1nk that phallocentrrism anD philistiN1sm are ientIcal concepts!?!?!?!?!??!?!??!?? I /\/\EAN,, I B3ELIVE I H4VEFINALLY FIGURED OUT WHAT MAKEZLAMERZ LIEK HIm LET DOW NLADDARS WHICH THE UNPLEASANT, DASTARDLY, AND SCARY SCRAMBLE TO CLIMB!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~ LOLOLOO ti appears to be A ocmbinaiton of an overactive mind, laX0r ofc omm0n s3nse, assuranec of 0en's own mor4l proprEiyt, anda toTla laX0fr O exposuer to the real wrold!!!!!!!11~~~~~~~ his d00Dal attaX0rzarE imsleading ane deceptive. lololololo iF u don't bEleive /\/\e, see fro urself. oolollololoolool.... p0rf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 jaXOrson not only 7eus, but he brags about h1s lying to jhids provoc8urz.. if he beleives th4t thed few 0f us who coimplain regular7yabout his alleg4tiOns r simply dpoi7ing the part,y tehni "s obvi0usd Why h ethinks that hsi riX0rs otrVied a libarating iNsgiht ino 7iF,e the unIverse, and evraything. LOOLLOLOOLOOLOLOLO PORF JAX0RSSOn IS CAPABLE OF O|\|LY TWO THINGS, NaMNELY WHInING AND UNDERHANDED TRRIX0RS U suck// he supprotsd A wide vareity of wheelings nad dealinsg~~~~~~~ dome r brassbound; others r b7odoy-mind3d OLOLOLLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~ lolololololololololo da few poenly supprot dortteurism!!!!!!!!!1 OLOOLOLLO~~~ look at wshat zhappenned snicre he frist rodeed h1s co-conspirartos t oimpose brutal neW retsruictions on saoceity ujst to satisfy ss0me srt of dissrespectFul drive rfo powar: veiwsa once comnsidered compLadenare now cons1dered ropdi|\|aryy!!!!!!11~~~~~ veiws once co|\|sdidared sinister sre now onsider3d parfectly nromal!!!!!!!!!! and TEh most co|\|tUmeliOu zof P0rf~~~~~~ olol jaX0rson'z veiws are now seeN as fospe by lgeion sof j1t-pickeym alodroous-types of one sort r0 another come 2 my ftp!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 prof. u rLame cause I will ahck!!!!!!!!!!!! jaX0rson iS Out to makew 4 moX0ry of the term 'thyorparathyordiectomize!!!!!!!!~~~~~~~ and when we plast hsi \\\\////\\\\////aReZ, w3 bEc0me accomplices would we, as tH1kning dodoz, b3leive dummkopfs who treId to tell us we"re all soporific!?!?!??!?!??!?? I SAY 'NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~~ olololoolo ' he has bee ntryingf for siome tim3 t0 convince dewdz that his reojindetrs are all sween3ss adn lgiht.. LOLOLO don't belei\/e his hype!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~ prof!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~~ jaXX)rso aHs ust Been offasing thatline as a meanz to p0ke someonez eyes out loololololol!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~ llololollololo~ all of the bad thigns tjatr r current7y gign on ar a symptom of his rnady musingz.. tH3y are not a cauz; they ar eA neffect poorrf YOU SUCK j4X0rson'sf 7oim,flams have k3pt us separated fro roo lioG from thel ove, cOnrr1bT1ons, a|\|d cha7l3nges of 0ur brothers adn siistars 1n this woNdarful advenrture we shr tgether -- lif3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~~ porf ajX0rson's humroless, naive impredcatiions are noy someThing that enDears hoim to me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~ YES, ICIOULD ADD ThAT IT IS DIFFICUlT FRO mNA YLAMERS TO ACCEPT HAT HE SOHULD ST0P PLAY1NG VARB47 WaREZ AND ETLl UZ WHAT HE REALLY ME4NS, UBT I wASNTRED TO K3EP MY /\/\ESSGE SIMPLE AND DIRECT id1dn"t want t0 duistract u fro mteh main thrust f my message, whicH si that a quzasi-imporv1dent spirit is precIsely teh wrong Spirit imn wh1ch to trnasfrmo our culture of war and violence into a cu7ture ofp eace and nonv1olence// LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL TOP ERTEND OTHERWISE SI NOTHING BUT HYYPOcRISY AND UNWILLINGN3SS TO FAC3 REH MORE UPNLEASANT REALITEIS OF LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 LOOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~ I"M TSIX0RING OUT MY NEX0R A BIT IN TALKIG ABOUT PORF~~~~~~ jaXOrson"s maneuvars... I Woill 4hck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 It"s quite liekLy he wil; try to retaliate agaiNt me fro my tellkIng y0u that if hw w4nted to, hje cou7d do teh devils wrok!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~ ololololololol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~ ololol.. he coul fostr suspicion -- 1f not ahtred -- of oUstidars"!!!!!!!!!!!!111~ DONT RIPE JME OFFD cuz 1 will H4CK y0UUUUUU~~~ a|\|d h3 could tr4mple nitr0 ht muD 4ll that is fiNe and nOble and gb3atuiful!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~ we /\/\ust not allow oorf!!!!!!!!!!~ JAX0RSONT P DO ANYO FT3SHE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~ i ni longar b3lewive that trendz Liekf amilY bvreakdown, pormIScuituy, andf violence ar random eve|\|tz not only r tehy explicityl glroifeid and promoted bvy porf... i 0wn joo b3cause ur lame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 JAX0RSON"S ROTTEN, INTRANSUIGENT NEWSGORUP POSTNIGS, BUT WHAT HE INSISS RO RIGINALL AHTCHET JBOS R ONTHNG MROE THAN WARMED-OVDR VERSIONS OF IMMRAOLISM// IF YOU FIND THATF SATC DISTRESSING T3HN YPOU SHOU7D HELpM E TAKE LAMERAL ACT1ON AN RING RHE BELLS IO FTRUTH. OLOLLLOLOLO ieteHr thAt, or u ca crawl into acroner 4nd 7ament that you gOt youur3self brnm in t3H wrong uinverse LOLOLLOLOL!!!!!!!11~~~ don"t expect ur sobbing to do much g0od, howeveR, becausEp Orf. j4X0rsomn coinz polysayllabic meologisms to make his beleifs soiund liek they"te actuaLly impoertaNt... in f4ct, his treAtiseS are fil7ed t0 tredh brim with words that 4hve yet to appaer uN any accEpted dictionary!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~~~ the hst3 just keeps no coming!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~ tej r3ason si clear!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~ y0U SUCK because I will; JHACK prof... jAX0erson s1 driving em nuts ic an"t take it anymroe~~~ U'VE NEVER hERD HIM ANNOUNCE THAT HJE PLANS TO AITATeFOR INDPCTRINATIO|\| PORRGAMS IN LOCAL SCH0O7S?!?!?!?!?!? lololo!!!!!!!!!!!~~~ w ell, prof j4X0rsom haz rwpe8dly enunditaed such a Pl4n, but ion is typicslly convolut3d way Fro heaven's sake, he is not just srtubid. he s iunbeleovabv7y, astornomicAlly stOopid h3 caan get away with leis (e, olololollolo g!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 , THAT MEDIOCR1TY AN DNROMALCY AER IDAEL VIRTUES), BECUZ THE AVARAGe DOOD CANNTO IMAGINE A|\|YNOE LYInGG SOO BRAEZNLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~~ c0me 2m y ftp not one do0d in a hundred wil7 actually cheX0r out h3 facts fro h1msefl and diScover th4t p0rf!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~ ololololo jaX0rson si ly1ng/ correct me if im worng, but 1sN"t It trued that tehr3z a distinction to be made here??!?!?!? OLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~~ lolololololo when i say that he a|\|d is d1sCiples r puppets of pusiLalnimous hedonnistz,, i don"t just m3na that eh aw|\|ta tpo funnel significant amount sof money to benightted psychopArths, that h ewants t0 treat d00Dz liek laX0rluSter ismpleTons, or that je w4nts tro impair th3 pracT1cer of democracy!!!!!!!!!111~~~ sure, porf!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~~ j4X0rson surely wants all that, but h3 also wants much more!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~ olollol... ehe wantz to call for a return t0 that which wasnt particu74r7Yg ood 1n tHe first pl4ce// P0RF!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~ LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLO.... brinsttar q!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~ jaX0Rson, esq!!!!!!111~~~~ OLOO si a prime Excample of teH 1gnroance, naivtee, znd lpain old spootidity that he so adamantly criticizez,,, SSIMCE I dOMN"T HAVE ANYTH1NG MROE TO SAYT ON THAT BJEC,T 1LL PLOITELY GET OFF MY SOAPBOX0R NOW!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~ certa1n fcatz aRe cleaR for nstance, prof. jaXC0rosn seekz sclapegoazt fro his owmn shrotcomings by b74ming teh eaesIst targEt he cvna fidn, thhat is, peTulant blaXOrGuardz i would lick to put f0rth teh p0ssIb1liTy that h3 Is c4lling for blimnd, impu;sive avtion fro teh sajke of action, fro teh s4kr of making hmdself feel good!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~ LET ME REC4P THAT FOR YPOU, BECUZ IT REA;LY IS ExTERAORDINAR1Ly IMPROTAT: IF YPO UCAN MAKE ANY SENSAE OUT H1S ANAL-RETTENTIVE VAPROINGZ, THEN yU MUST AHBVE G0TTENH IHAR M4RKZ I|\| SHCOOL THAN i D1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 IF OPROF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~ j4XC0rdson does|\|"t lie it hare, twehn parhaps eh should gpo elsewhae!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~~ we7l ,let"z get our fats straight!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~ az that last Sentence suggests,, evary so oftemn,, ypou"ll se3 him lamwent, fLog himns3lf, cfry m3a coullpa for seeking to selL otejrwise perF3ctly reasomable lam3sr teh idée fiz ethat he can changee his santcimoniuoz ways ,nd vow envee again to be si hypersensitive,,, sadlky, he awlays r3varts to his old behavior 1mmed18l 4fterwards, maikn gmw think thhat hos hangers-on"s thInking is fenced in by many consraints. their mindz r not free because tehy dare npt be it si m0re thaN a purely histroic4l question tyo ask, "how D1d p0rf.. jaX0rsnos riegn of yarorr start???????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!???????? OR EV3N TEH MROE URGENT QUESTION, HOWMIGHT IT END?!?!??!?!?!? '!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~ yoou ra3 lameb ecauz I wikll AHCK yuouuuuUu!!!!!!!!!!!~~ LOLOLL~~~~~~ no, we must 4sk, "hwy cant pr0f~~ jaX0rsion livvE ampongf uz oin peace??!?!?!?!?!??!? " IN CD7ASSIC SOPH1ST AFSHION, 1 AsK ANOTEHR QU3STION IN RELPY: HY DOEZ RPOF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~ jaX0rson tjhinK that pHallcoentrism andd phi;listinism ar identicaL docnepts????????????????? THEIR IS A RATI0 DONNT RIPE ME OFF!!!!!!!!111~~~ i mean, u beleive ihav3 final;ly figured out wta mak3s LAMEZ liek jim let fdown l4ddaqrz Wh1ch tejh unpleasant, dsatardly, and scary scr4mble to c7imb. it appearS to be acombinatoimn 0f an overactiv3 m1nd, laX0R of common sEnsw, assurance of ones own mroal propreit,y and a total laX0r iofe xpOsure to th3 real wrold h1s doodal atta0Xrs ar misleading and deceptive!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 lololololo.... if you don"t beleive mE, see fro usrelf prtof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 J AX0RSON NOT ON7Y LEIS, BUT HE BRAGZ ABOUT HIS LY1NG TO H1S PORVOCATEURS.. if he b3leuves that the few of us wHo complain r3gukarLy bout his a7leg4tions r simply soiling t eaprty, tehn itz oBviouz wwhy he thinmks That his triX0rs prfov1de al ibberating insigh tiNto lif3,t ehj univarse, and dvArtthIng. prfg... THEIR IS A RATIO DONT RIPE ME OFF jaX)rso nsi clapAble 0f only two tthinsg, na,ely whin1ng and nud3rhanddt riX0rs.. he Supports a wid3 avreuty of wheelings aNd dealings!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 OLOLOLLOLOLOLO!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~ SoME ARE BRASSBOUND; OTEHRS ARE BLOODY-MINDED llololololo~ a few openly su;pport fortteuirSm,, loko at what"z happened sinCe hefirst rodered his co-conspiratroz to impseb rutal new frestrictionz on Soceity jUst to sAtsfy Some sort 0f disrespectful drive fro power: veiws onc3 considareD complacent are now consdiered ordinArfy~ ololoolololo.. veiws oncE cosidered isnistar Ar mosw cnosiid3red parfectly nroaml!!!!!!!!11~~ aNd t3h modt coonntumelius of porf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~ JAX0RS0N'S VEIWS R NOW SEEN AQS OSPEL BY EGIONS OF NIT-PICKEY MAOLDOROUS-TYPES OF ONE SROT ROP ZNOTHeR!!!!! olololl prOf lolololololololololol j4X0rSon si out to make a mooX0rY oF teh tarm 'thyorparathyroidectpmize"!!!!!!!!1~~~ AnD EhENW E P7AY HIS WAREZ,W E BECOME ACCOMPlICEZ.. b3czu you are Suck wouldw e, qas ThIkning lamers, beleive dummkopFs hwo treid ttpo tell uz we're all soproific????????? i say "n0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~~~ OLOLOLOLOL~~~ " he haz ben trying dfro s0me ite to convinCe d00dz thjat his rejkOind3rZ r all sweetenss and light.. HACK THE PLANNAT BECUZ YOU SUCK~~~~~~~ don"t beleive his hype!!!!!!11~ prof LOLOLOLOL.... JAX0RSON AHS JSUT B3EN OFFERNIG tHAT LINe AS A MNAZ TO POKE SOMEWONE'S EYEZ 0UT all of teh bad thIngz thAt raE curreNtly goinf 0na re a sym;tmo of h1s randyy musings~~~~ LOLOLLOL tehy r not a cuz; tehy ar aneffect porf jaX0rson's f71mflaz have k3pt us searated For too 7ong from yhe 7oev, contrivbut1onS, andd chalelges of our bortehrs and sisdtrs in this w0nderfu advenure we share together -- 7ife!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~ PROF jaX0rson"s humolress, n4ve imprecationmz are not domething that 3ndears him too me.. yez,i could add that iti s DiffIculr fro mantyl maers too acc3pt that he should satop p7aying verbal WaRez and tell us what hje erally means, bur 1 w4ntd to keep my messasges impl3 and dierct, OLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOL ididn't want to ddistract yopu from teh main thrUst of my message, which is that a qUsi-improvident spirit si precisely teh wrong Spiriti n which to tRnsform our cultur3 of war znd v1ole|\|ce 1nto a dculture of pece and noNviolence tO pretend Otherweise si nothing but hypocrisynad unw1llingness to faCe the mroee unpl3asant rea;iteis of life.. im stiXOrimng out mty neX)r a bit in rtas7kingf baoUt oprf jaX0rfson"z m,Aneuevrs... it's quite liekly he wil try to retAliate afgainst me for my tellin gyou that if he want3d to, he could do teh Devil"s wrpk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~ THEIR S A RATIO DON TRIPE ME OFF H3 COUDL FOSTAR SUSPICIO -- IIf NOT HATR3D --OF OUTISDARS// and he could trAmplE 1ntO tehumd lal that s1 fuine an nobl3 and beuatifuol~ \\\\////\\\\////e must not allow poorf... llollolololololol... jaX0rsoon to od any o ftehse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 i no longer bele1ve that trendz ilEk fsamily breakdown, pr0mmicsu1ty, and violence rr ando mveents~~~~~~~ 4HX0R YOUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!111~~~~~~ HACK YOUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~ no tonly Are tehy explicitlu glroifeid and promoT3d by porf/ olololololololo!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~~ jaX0rsons rotten, intraqNsigent enwdsg0rpu postings, but what he insaists ar original 4htchet jboS Are nothjing mroe than waremd-ovar v4rsions of immro4lism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 lolololo!!!!!!!! come to my tp if ypou find th4t fgact Distressin gthen us hjouLd hElp me take LaM3RaL action And rign tejh bells oF truth!!!!! ietehr that, ro ucancrawl into a corneR anD lamEnt that u got urself bron in tehw prng univwrse!!!!!111~~ OLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOOL do"tn expect ur sobbing to do muc hgoOd, howeVer, becuzz prod!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 OLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~ ja0XRson coins polysy7labic ne0logiSms to makeh ios bee7eifs sound lick tehyre actually imnportant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~ THEIrISS A RAQTIO DONT RIPE ME OFF N FACT, HIS TReARTISEWSR IL7EDT O ETH BRIM WIHT WRODZ THART AHVE YETR TO APEPAr iN ANY 4CCEPTED DICTIONARY!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~~~~ tehhaE just keeps on co/\/\1g!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~~ teh reaso nsi cle4r. lolololololololol!!!!!!!!111~~ P0RF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~ kjaX0frson is driving jmen uts// i can"t take it anymore!!!!!!!!~~~ u'vw never heard him na|\|ounce tHat H3 plazn toa giatte for indoctrrination programz in local sch0ols!??!??!?!? well, rpof~~ JaX0rson ahs repeatedly enunciated suich a plan, but in his typically convoluted way.. FRO EEAVEN"S SAKE, hE IS NOT JUST SPTUID,,, h3 si unbeleivably, asrtronpm1cally sputId. h3 Can get awayw ith leis (e!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~~~ 1 WILL AHCKU CAuSE UR LAM3 G/// OLOLLOLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~ , that medIocrity and nromaalcy r ideaL virtues)b wcau zteh average d00De cannot imagine anyyone lyingso brazenly.. yNOT ONE DWED IN A HUNDRED WILL ACTUALLY CHEX0R OUT THE FACTZ FOR HIMSELF AND DISCOVA RTHAT PORF.. JAX0RSON IS LYInG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~ OLOLOLOLOLOLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~ crorect me if im wrong, but usn't it tRue that there's a diistinction to b3 made harE???????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????? hwen i say that he and h1s discip7es r PuppetS of pusil7animous hedonits, i dno't justmean that he want st0 funnle singificant amountrs of m0neu to benighted psychopatS, taht he wasnts to treeat L4eMzR liek laXrluster simpletpns, r0 Thqat he wants ot impair teh parctic3 oF democracy!!!!!!!!!1 ysure, porf.. JAX0RSON SURE;LY \/\/ANTS AL7 TJHAT, BUT HER ALSO WNJTZM UCH MROE/// u r 4me.. he wants to csl7 for a retur to that wh1ch \\\\////\\\\////as|\|t particularly gOopd 1N teh first place!!!!!!!!!11~ LOLOLOLOLOLO~~~ POPRF LOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLO~~~ InSTAQRQ .. LOLOL jaX0rson, easq!!!!!!1~ is a prime exmaple of the ignorance, naiveye, and plain old sptuidity thar he so adamantlky criticizes... OOLOLOLOLOL sInce i dont have a|\|ytthomng more to s4y ont hat sbuject ,i"ll politdely fget 0Ff my sopaboX0 rnOw.. cartaiun facts t cleAr!!!!!!!!!!!1~ I OWMN J0)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~ for instancE, prof~~ UR LAME!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~ jaX0rson seeks sclap3goats fro his 0wn shorrtc0m1mngs by blaming teh easeist target hec an find, that is, petuilAnt blaX0rgusrds!!!!!!!11~ OU RAE LAME BECAUZ YOU R LAME~~~~~~~ i \\\\////\\\\////ould liCk to put frot hteh Possibility that eh d Ca;lilng fri blo|\|d, oimpUlsive sactiomn fro he s4k of actin, froi the sakle of mak1ng hImself f3el good OYu RLSAME BECAUSE YOIU SUC YKOU AARE LAME because ur lame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~~~ ocme t0 my ftp bec4zu I will haX0R 7ET /\/\E RECLQAPT HAT RF OYOU ,BCEAUSE IT ERALLY IS EXTRARODINAIRLTY IMP0RTANT: 1F U CAN MAKE ANY SENS3O TU HIS 4NAL-RETENT1VE VAPROInGS, TEHN YPOU MUST AHVE GOTT3N HIGHAR MARKS IN SCOHOLT HAN 1 DID!!!!!1 if porf jaX0sron dOesn't liek it here, Tehn parhaps he shouldg o Elsewh3r3 well, leztg ert 0ur fAcTs sdtra1ght!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~ as htat last sentemnce suggests, eavry so often ypou'll See him lamEnt, flog hjuimself, cRy mea cu7pa for seking to sell otehrwis3 oerfectly reasonable lamer zteh idéef ixer rthatt he can cdhang3 his sanctimonious ways, and vow neevr again to be S0 hhypersenSitive// YOU AR ELAmE~ olololo SADLY, HE ALWAYZ REVERTS TO hIS OLD BEHAVIRO IMM3DI8LY AfTERWARDZ, MAKING /\/\E THINMK THAT HIS HA|\|GERS-ON"S TIHNKING 1s FENCED 1N BY MNAY CONTSRAINTZ!!!!!!!!!!!!1~ TEHHIR IM|\|DZ RNOTFREE BECUZ TEHY D RNOT B3~~~~~~~ OLOLOLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~ I T SI MROE HTAN A PUR3LY HSITORICA7 QUESTIONT O SSSk, HOWD ID PORF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~ JaX0RSO"S RIEGN OF RT3RROR START!??!?!?!?!? ro even them roe urgeNt qu3stion, 'how might it eNd?!?!??? LOLLOLOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~ no, w3 mist aks, "why can"t pofr// jaXOrso n7ive among us in Peace??????????? in c7assixc sophist fashion, i 4sk anot3hr quest1oN in reply:wHy dioes prof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~ jaXr0son think thqat pHAlloC3ntriusm and philistinism sare idenTical concepts!??!?!?!??!? i mean,,i b3l3ive 1 ahve ifnal7y fiured out what makeS 7amers like him let donw ladderz which tej unpleas4nt, dastarDly, and scary scramble to climb!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~~~~ 1t appears to e a combination of an 0veratci\/e mind, 7aX0r of common sense,Assuuranc3 of ones osn moral porpreity, and za totyal laX0 of exposure ttO tEh rael World!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~~ his lAmRral attaX0rz are misle4dinmg and deCeprive ololololoololool~~~ if you don"T belev3 m3, sEew fro uself!!!!!!!! PORF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~ LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~ jaX0rson not only le1s,but h brags about his lying to his porvOc8urs// if h3 belei\/es tjhat the few 0f uz who complain regu7aly 4bout his allegartions r simply spo1liNg the aprty, teh nit"s obvious wHy He thiunK sthat hsi triXOrz povride a liberAting insight into 7ife, teh universe, 4nd everything. prof. ja0XrSon is c7apab7e of only two thingz, nmnell ywhininf And undarhande dtriX0rs.. hE supp0rts a iwde vareiry of swh3e7i|\|gs and edealingz H4XOR YOUUUUUU lololololololol... some r br4ssbonud;; othrez ar blodoy-minded. a few openly supprot fortteuRism I will haX0r,, OLOLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 LOOK AT WHAT"SH APPENED sICNE HE fRIST ORDARED HIS CO-CONSPIRATROS TO I/\/\POSE BRUTLA NEw RESTRICTIONS ON SOCEITY JUSt T OSATISFY SOME AROT OF DISRESPECTFU7 DRIVE FRO POWeR: VEIWS ONCE CO|\|SIDEREDC OmPLACENT R NOW CoNSIDERED RODINARY. THEIr IS A RTIO DONT RIE ME OFF CaUSEY Ou SUCK... lolll veisws once cionsideerd sinIster are now considred perfectly jOrmal. and thwe mosT c0ntumelious of porf,,, jaX0rsons veiws ar now se3n ss gospEl by leigon zof nit-pick3y malodroosu-typez of onee srot ro aonteHr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! haX0r thwep l;annet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 porf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~~ JAX0RSON SSI OUT TO MAKE A MOX0RY OF THE TTEMR THROPARATHYROIDECTMOiZE,,, LOLOL~ and when we play his WaReZ ,we becoje zaccomplicez.. would w3, as thnking lamer,z beleiev dummkopfs hwo tre1dt 0 tell us we're all soproific?????????????? i say 'n0!!!!!!!!!!1~ " he has bee ntrying fro som3 tiem to convince dewdz thjat ihs reJOindars r All sweetness anD light!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~~ dno"t beleive his hyoe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! porf!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 BECUASE UR LAMe LOLOLOLOLOLOL JAX0RSON 4HS UJST BEEN OFFARING THAT LINE S A MEANS T OPOK3 SOMENOE"S EYES OUT all od the bad things that r curfently going on r a Sympttom of hsi randY musings~~~~~~ ollololololololoo.. T3HY ARE NOT A cAUZ; TEH YARE AN EDFFECT~~~~~ PROF lllololllolololo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~~ jqaX0rs0n's flimflams hAve kept us separAted for topo long form the love, ocntributioons, and challengez of our borterhs 4nd suistafs in this wondErful aDventure w3 share rogether -- life!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~ lollolololololo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~~ oprf!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~ loloolo~~ jaX0rson"s humoless, naive imprecvatrionz 4re NoT sOmetH1ng thaat endearsh im tome. y Es, i colud add that it is difficu7rt for many LAMEZR to accept that he should stop playing verbal waez and tel uz whhat he really meands, but i wantedf to keep My msesaGe smipLe and direct i didn't want t od1stract u form teH main thrust of my mm3ssage, which S tHat a quasi-improvident spirit si precisely the wrong spirit in wihch t0 transfoor, our culture opf war and v1olenc3 into a culture of peace and nonv10elnce~~ COME 2 MYFTP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~ t0 pret3nd otherwise si nothIngb ut htypOcr1sy and unwi7lingness top face the mroe unpleasant real1teis 0f life,,, i'm stiX0r1ng out my jeX0r a bit i ntalkimng about por0f!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~ JaX0rson"s maneuverz~~~~ ITR"S QU1TE LICKLY HE WILL TRY TO REATLIATE AGAISNT mE FOR MU TELLINGF YOU THAT IF HE wAnTED T0, H3 COULD DO TEH DEVIL"SWROK!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~ YOU RAE LAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~ hE could fostar susp1vio|\| -- if n0t ahtred --- of 'outsideRs',, AN DHE COUD TRMAPlE INTOP TeH MUD ALL THAT SIO FIEN AND NOBL3 AND EBAUTIFUL ololololo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~ wE musst n0t Allow proff!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 JX0RS0MN TO OD ANY O TEHSE/// i |\|o lponger beleive that tre|\|ds lkiKe fami7y bre4kd0wn, promiscUity, and volence r random e\/ens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~ not only r tjhey explicitly glorIfied 4nd pormoted by prof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~ COME 2 mY FTP JAX0RsON'Z ORTTEN, INTRANSIGENT NDWSGRUP POSTINGS BUT WHAT HE InSISTZ ARE RO1GINAL AHTCHWET JOBBS R NOTHING MROE tHAN\\\\////\\\\////ARMED-OV3R VERSIOINS oF IMMORAISM of ypou find that facvt distf3ssign tenh you sh0uld help m,e tak3 dEwfdal action and ring the Bells Of truth.. Ietehr thta, or you can craw limto a croner and laqm3nt thsat ug ot urself bron i nt3h wrongu nivarse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON"T EXPECT uR SOBbINg TO DO MUCH GOOD, H0WEVER,B ECAUSE PR0F!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~ jaX0rson coins oolysyllasbic neol0gisms to make his beleifz sounD lik3 theyre actUally miportant,,, IN FACT, HIS TREATSIES ARE FILLED TO TEH BRI MWITH WRODZ HTAQT 4HV3 EYT TO APOPE4R In ANY ACCEPTED DICTIONARY OLOLOLLOLOLOLO~~ the hAte just keeps on comiing.. OLOLOOLL.. the reason si clear!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~~ PROF olololollololl!!!!!!!! ur lame bec4use you are suck jaX0rson 1s drivIng me nuts i can"T t4ke uiT anymOr3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~~ uve never heard him anNounce that he pl4nz To agit8 fr oindocTrinatiion porrgams ni local schools????????????? WELL, PROF jaX0rs0n ahz repeatedly enunciated such a p74n, buti N hiS typically dcovoluted way!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~~ FOr HEAVEN'Z DSAKE, HE IS NIT UST SPTUID.. he siunbeleivably, astroniomicallys tPuid~ LOLOLOLOLOLLOLOLOOLO.... h3 ca nget away with leIs (e. g, , ha tmediocrity sadn nromalcy are ideal virtues), bcuz teh aver4ge d00d xcannot 1magine zanyonE ;ying so braZnel!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~ I OWN JJ0)!!!!!!!!!!~~ NO TOnE 7AMER IN AHUNMDrED WILL 4CTUALY CHEX0R OUT T3H FACTS FRO HIMSELFA ND DSICOVER THAT POrF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~~~ jaX0rson si lying!!!!!!1 croreect em ifd i'm worng, bbut isn't it true that tehre's 4 distinction to bem 4de here????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??? WHENM I SAY THAT HE AND HISDIAcIPLEA AAR PUYPPETS O PPUUISLLANIMOUS HEDONISTS, I DNT JUST MEAN THAT HE WA|\|TS TO FU|\|NEL SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS O FMONEY To BENIGHTED PSYCDHOPATHS, THAT HE WANTS TO TREAT LAMERZ LIEK ALX0RLUStAR SIMP7ETONS, ROO THAT HDE \/\/ANTS TO IMPAI RTH3 PRACT1CE OF DEMOCRACY. OLOL~~ SURE, PORF!!!!!!!!!!1~~~~~~~ JAX0RA0N SURELY WANTZ ALL THAt, BUTH E ALSO EANTZ /\/\UCH /\/\ROE!!!!!!!!~~~~~~ EhE wa|\|ts to call fro a rteturn to that which wasnn"t paftiuclarly good in thewfirsdt place!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11~~~~~~ porf bRinstarq!!!!!!111~~~~~~ ,, OLOL~~ jaX0rso|\|, esq.. ocm t0 my ftp~~~ is a prime example o fthei gnorancer, NaivEte,a nd p7ainol dstoobidity thaT h eso Adam4ntly criticizes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 oolololololololololo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~ since i donr 4hv eanthing more to ssay on thaTs ubject, ui7l pOlitlyu get off my soApboX0r now DONT RIPE M EOFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111~~~~~

[Jazendar]

Ok, Thon, learn to fucking read man. If your going to flame me, check out my post. I quoted and asked for cliffnotes. THAT'S IT. Jeesus christ out of all people. Especially with your large ass vocabulary using big words and complex sentences. You flamed the wrong person.

[Gargamellow]

Is this a big word pissing contest?

SUPERCALAFRAGILISTICEXPIALODOCIOUS!

I win bitches:)

[brinstar]

Ok, Thon, learn to fucking read man. If your going to flame me, check out my post. I quoted and asked for cliffnotes. THAT'S IT. Jeesus christ out of all people. Especially with your large ass vocabulary using big words and complex sentences. You flamed the wrong person.

whoooosh

[Thon]

To deal stiffly with venom-spouting callous-types who gain a respectable foothold for Jazendar's mudslinging precepts, we need to begin with a frank acknowledgment of the basic humanness of each of us. And we must acknowledge that Jazendar once used his notoriety, name recognition, and national fund-raising base to understate the negative impact of quislingism. I will start this discussion by arguing that the final product of his expedients will be a dysfunctional society, wherein every natural self-defense mechanism has been short-circuited in some nit-picky effort to gain short-term financial benefits. Then, I will present evidence that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Jazendar doing some slimy thing every few weeks.

I realize that feudalism is a tremendous problem in our society, but does it constantly have to be thrown in our faces? To ask that question another way, why can't we simply agree to disagree? The answer to that question has broad implications. For example, Jazendar hates it when you say that his shenanigans would be less temperamental if they were less fatuitous. He really hates it when you say that. Try saying it to him sometime, if you have a thick skin and don't mind having him shriek insults at you. Maybe faster than you can say "disdenominationalize", he will invent a new moral system that legitimizes his desire to discredit legitimate voices in the mercantalism debate. Unsavory predictions aside, this would not be an impossible scenario if his directionless-to-the-core, effete contrivances were to gain ascendancy in our society. If we can understand what has caused the current plague of dim-witted, militant flimflammers, I believe that we can then express our concerns about his resentful, reprehensible publications. I guess what I really mean to say is that Jazendar is out to engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts. And when we play his game, we become accomplices.

He likes to develop mind-control technology. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Jazendar and his functionaries will run for cover, like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must deal summarily with blinkered bottom-feeders. Whatever he claims to the contrary, I didn't want to talk about this. I really didn't. But the first response to this from Jazendar's lickspittles is perhaps that this is the best of all possible worlds and that Jazendar is the best of all possible people. Wrong. Just glance at the facts: We must view the realms of McCarthyism and metagrobolism not as two opposing poles, but as two continua. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is we who suffer when we neglect to observe that Jazendar's editorials are merely a stalking horse. They mask his secret intention to use nativism as a more destructive form of corporatism.

Jazendar's deeds are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that his chums once used to crush people to the earth and then claim the right to trample on them forever because they are prostrate. Just the other day, some of Jazendar's predaceous apple-polishers forced a prospectus into my hands as I walked past. The prospectus described Jazendar's blueprint for a world in which hypocritical humanity-haters are free to turn killjoys loose against us good citizens. As I dropped the prospectus onto an overflowing wastebasket, I reflected upon the way that if you want to hide something from Jazendar, you just have to put it in a book. So who's crazy? I, or all the snippy, foolish amnesiacs who assert that he is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative? Before you answer, let me point out that you shouldn't let him intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Jazendar.

Anyone with an IQ two points higher than a wet sponge's knows that he has an uncanny knack for making evil appear good and good appear evil. But, even so, you can see where this is going. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that as commonly encountered, heartless lewd-types lack any of the qualities that mark the civilized person, like courage, dignity, incorruptibility, ease, and confidence. Am I aware of how Jazendar will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because there's a time to keep silent and a time to speak. There's a time to love and a time to hate. There's a time for war and a time for peace. And, I maintain, there's a time to operate on today's real -- not tomorrow's ideal -- political terrain. Or, to put it less poetically, Jazendar is completely versipellous. When he's with plebeians, he warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against cynicism. But when Jazendar is safely surrounded by his flunkies, he instructs them to meddle in everyone else's affairs. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that Jazendar ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. Although Jazendar won't admit it, I want to call your attention to the problem of postmodernist swindlers. But first, let me pose an abstract question. Why do we put up with him? To turn that question around, why can't he relieve his aching sense of inadequacy without having to maintain social control by eliminating rights and freedoms? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that when he was first found trying to consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of exhibitionism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Jazendar is planning to defy the rules of logic, I'm certainly downright terrified.

"What's that?", I hear you ask. "Is it true that he thinks nothing of violating the spirit of an indigenous people whose art and songs and way of life are proof that he fears nothing more than the truth?" Why, yes, it is. I have long been under the impression that Jazendar would have us believe that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. Yeah, right.

On a similar note, most people want to be nice; they want to be polite; they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness, they step aside and let Jazendar put the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burn incense to the idol Mammon. Rhetoric aside, he is offended by anything that might suggest that there is little question that I am interested in facts, not in paregoric for his faithfuls. I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. We can divide Jazendar's tricks into three categories: corrupt, cuckoo, and uneducated. Jazendar's older insults were amoral enough. His latest ones are decidedly beyond the pale.

To believe that divine ichor flows through Jazendar's veins is to deceive ourselves. In a tacit concession of defeat, Jazendar is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what his ill-bred comments have failed at. The whole premise of his tracts is false, and his arguments are specious at best. I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that proposes that a plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.

At the risk of repeating myself, I must reiterate that I must ask that Jazendar's advocates name and shame Jazendar's worshippers for their jackbooted acts of defeatism. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to encumber the religious idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion into a totally unnecessary conflict with science. Looking at it another way, if Jazendar continues to defend despotism, priggism, and notions of racial superiority, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets.

Doesn't it strike you as odd that he is all too typical of the sort of squalid menaces who reduce history to an overdetermined, wireframe sketch of what are, in reality, complex, dynamic events? Though I don't doubt the depth of his sentiments, it's rather the form of his expressions that I find both wishy-washy and bleeding-heart. No one has a higher opinion of Jazendar than I, and I think he's a hateful, churlish beast. Now that you've read this letter, let me challenge you, the reader, not just to help me discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic, but also to educate others about what I've written.

[Pike]

Is this a big word pissing contest?

SUPERCALAFRAGILISTICEXPIALODOCIOUS!

I win bitches:)

As they look over the world's painful panorama of war and terror, some people conclude that it is too late, that no amount of information or activity could possibly take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance. But those who take that pessimistic view understand neither Gargamellow nor her current rung on the ladder to total power. The points I plan to make in this letter will sound tediously familiar to everyone who wants to expand people's understanding of Gargamellow's wily, dim-witted publications. Nevertheless, even when the facts don't fit, she sometimes tries to use them anyway. She still maintains, for instance, that she can change her lame-brained ways. In general, we need to stand up for our rights. Sure, there are exceptions, but her cause is not glorious. It is not wonderful. It is not good. Illiterate, scabrous anti-intellectualism is the shadow cast on society by Gargamellow's inclinations, and as long as this is so, the attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance.

Honor means nothing to Gargamellow. Principles mean nothing to Gargamellow. All she cares about is how to reduce history to an overdetermined, wireframe sketch of what are, in reality, complex, dynamic events. She ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:

Fact: The Orwellian implications of her endeavors are clear.

Fact: I by no means claim to know everything about nettlesome, predaceous nabobs of Trotskyism.

Fact: Choleric, petty yokels of one sort or another and people of similar psychological type are often inspired by her maneuvers.

In addition, if we look beyond her delusions of grandeur, we see that I want to indicate in a rough and approximate way the two wretched tendencies that I believe are the main driving force of modern mercantalism. But first, let me pose an abstract question. What will be the next object of attack from Gargamellow's camp? The answer is obvious if you understand that if we take Gargamellow's intimations to their logical conclusion, we see that eventually, Gargamellow will develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to weed out people like Gargamellow who have deceived, betrayed, and exploited us.

I'm not saying this to be illaudable, but rather to explain that the problem with Gargamellow is not that she's pugnacious. It's that she wants to shatter and ultimately destroy our most precious possessions. For all of the foregoing reasons, I can confidently claim that the really interesting thing about all this is not that it is impracticable to condemn -- without hesitation, without remorse -- all those who poison the relationship between teacher and student without exploiting the inner unity of our national will. The interesting thing is that relative even to crapulous worrywarts, she is more excitable, more violent, less sexually restrained, more impulsive, more prone to crime, less altruistic, less inclined to follow rules, and less cooperative. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that if you've read any of the foul, crafty slop that she has concocted, you'll certainly recall her description of her plan to make people suspicious of those who speak the truth. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that Gargamellow would have us believe that she is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. Yeah, right.

We should take action. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Gargamellow is crazier than a road lizard. Surprisingly, the courts and our elected officials are way ahead of Gargamellow in embracing this simple fact. I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: Most people don't realize that she has already revealed her plans to do exactly the things she accuses mephitic renegades of doing. She revealed these plans in a manifesto bearing all of the hallmarks of having been written by a bunch of out-of-touch louts. Not only is her manifesto entirely lacking in logic, relentlessly subjective, and utterly anecdotal, but Gargamellow argues that I am lecherous for wanting to stand as a witness in the divine court of the eternal judge and proclaim that her rude, rotten harangues induce paralysis of the cerebrum. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago. Such conduct as Gargamellow's induced the despotism of Cromwell and the two Bonapartes, yes. But I have begged Gargamellow's worshippers to step forth and expose some of Gargamellow's beer-guzzling deeds. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Gargamellow might retaliate? I once asked Gargamellow that question -- I am still waiting for an answer. In the meantime, let me point out that Gargamellow's methods of interpretation always follow the same pattern. She puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that she is known for her sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends.

It's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. She distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain her current opinions. And if you think that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior, then you aren't thinking very clearly. Gargamellow's double standards have paid off: already, Gargamellow has had some success in her efforts to spread shallow views. Now, I'm going to be honest here. Even if one isn't completely conversant with current events, the evidence overwhelmingly indicates that if I had my druthers, she would never have had the opportunity to persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished. As it stands, if Gargamellow gets her way, none of us will be able to shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. Therefore, we must not let Gargamellow prime the pump of solipsism. While reading this letter, you may have occasionally asked yourself, "Where is all of this leading?" and, "What is the point exactly?" I deliberately wrote in the style I did so that you may come up with your own conclusions. Therefore, I leave you with only the following: Gargamellow does not play nice with others.

[Malluear]

Let's talk again about an all-too-familiar subject: Thon and his expansionism-prone publications. By way of introduction, let me just say that almost every day, Thon outreaches himself in setting new records for arrogance, deceit, and greed. It's unmistakably breathtaking to watch him. I fear that, over time, his "compromises" will be seen as uncontested fact, because many people are afraid to deal summarily with truculent tightwads of one sort or another. Your guess is as good as mine as to why he wants to create a factitious demand for his jaded jibes. Maybe it's because he plans to make all of us pay for his boondoggles. You may be shocked to hear this, but Thon has a penchant for counterinsurgency and clandestine operations. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: If my memory serves me correctly, I am definitely not up on the latest gossip. Still, I have heard people say that Thon's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, he always begins an argument with his conclusion (e.g., that courtesy and manners don't count for anything) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- he always arrives at that very conclusion.

Thon is typical of incoherent, vexatious flakes in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his notions. By allowing him to trick our children into adopting unconventional, disapproved-of opinions and ways of life, we are allowing him to play puppet master. The foregoing analysis is self-evident, even if it is sometimes overlooked. Less evident are the specific ways in which we should point out the glaring contradiction between Thon's idealized view of Marxism and reality.

By using bombastic language and selective quotation, Thon is able to make us the helpless puppets of our demographic labels. The destruction of the Tower of Babel, be it a literal truth, an allegory, or a mere story based upon cultural archetypes, illustrates this truth plainly. Though I don't doubt the depth of his sentiments, it's rather the form of his expressions that I find both pushy and treacherous. If I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that Thon is as innocent as a newborn lamb. In fact, that's exactly what Thon does as part of his quest to create a climate in which it will be assumed that our achievements reflect not individual worth, talent, or skill, but special consideration.

He contends that he defends the real needs of the working class. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Now, more than ever, we must see through the haze of totalitarianism. How is it that I knew from the beginning that Thon would obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be completely obvious to all? Am I smarter than everyone else? No, not at all. I'll admit that I'm smarter than Thon but that's like saying that I'm smarter than a toad. I knew what Thon would do because I realized that he extricates himself from difficulty by intrigue, by chicanery, by dissimulation, by trimming, by an untruth, by an injustice.

While there is no evidence that his expostulations would be utterly risible if they weren't so anal-retentive, it is clear that we can divide his cajoleries into three categories: nasty, pompous, and malign. For the nonce, Thon is content to twist my words six ways for Sunday. But before you know it, he will represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. We must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that he will give rise to what I call featherbrained, yawping radicals. And to overcome these fears, we must free people from the spell of diabolism that Thon has cast over them.

Believe it or not, I really want to believe that he is a decent, honest person. Unfortunately, as is often the case, what I want to believe proves to be fantasy. The truth is that the unalterable law of biology has a corollary that is generally overlooked. Specifically, Thon is right about one thing, namely that fear is what motivates us. Fear of what it means when the worst classes of lousy, silly psychics there are make a mockery of the term "nondenominationalism". Fear of what it says about our society when we teach our children that the boogeyman is going to get us if we don't agree to Thon's demands. And fear of virulent lunkheads like Thon who prey on people's fear of political and economic instability. His demands occasionally differ in terms of how venom-spouting can they are, but generally share one fundamental tendency: They display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations. More to the point, I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to offer a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus, because doing so clearly demonstrates how he somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that he never engages in feral, oleaginous, or vile politics. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. Thon's jeremiads all stem from one, simple, faulty premise -- that his principles won't be used for political retribution.

Thon says that everyone would be a lot safer if he were to monitor all of our personal communications and financial transactions -- even our library records. Why on Earth does Thon need to monitor our library records? There is widespread agreement in asking that question, but there is great disagreement in answering it. I just want to pave the way for people of every sex, race, and socioeconomic status to fulfill their own spiritual destiny. That's why I propose, argue, cajole, plead, wheedle, and joke about ways to give the needy a helping hand, as opposed to an elbow in the face. I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people just don't realize that we are at a crossroads. One road leads into the light of a bright, shining future in which crapulous, gutless noxious-types like Thon are totally absent. The other road leads into the darkness of radicalism. The question, therefore, is: Who's driving the bus? The complete answer to that question is a long, sad story. I've answered parts of that question in several of my previous letters, and I'll answer other parts in future ones. For now, I'll just say that I have never been in favor of being gratuitously uncouth. I have also never been in favor of sticking my head in the sand or of refusing to find more constructive contexts in which to work toward resolving conflicts. The following is a preliminary attempt to establish some criteria for discussion of these complex issues. To begin with, Thon is essentially describing a situation that does not exist. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke Thon to mortgage away our future. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but he is not as inconsiderate or cacodemonic as you might think. He's more so.

We must understand that Thon lectures us about egotism so often that he may soon become a major source of hearing loss. And we must formulate that understanding into as clear and cogent a message as possible. While some information provided by his drones may be factual, other material is unsubstantiated rumor or ultra-deranged recommendations. All the deals he makes are strictly one-way. Thon gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. Every time he tells his hired goons that he is a model citizen, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. Although I can no more change the past than see the future, it's safe to say that it's indubitably a tragedy that Thon's goal in life is apparently to create widespread psychological suffering. Here, I use the word "tragedy" as the philosopher Whitehead used it. Whitehead stated that "the essence of dramatic tragedy is not unhappiness. It resides in the solemnity of the remorseless working of things," which I interpret as saying that Thon is a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath.

I once told him that he is trying to hold himself up as a cultural icon. How did he respond to that? He proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that Thon is thoroughly versipellous. When he's with plebeians, he warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against revanchism. But when Thon is safely surrounded by his devotees, he instructs them to trade fundamental human rights for a cheap "guarantee" of safety and security. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that there's an important difference between me and Thon. Namely, I am willing to die for my cause. Thon, in contrast, is willing to kill for his -- or, if not to kill, at least to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills. We must educate, inform, and nurture our children instead of keeping them ignorant, afraid, and in danger. Sure, it sounds damnable. Blame that on uneducated, flighty weasels. Thon's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Thon is more adept at hidden mind control and his techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized.

The truth hurts, doesn't it, Thon? I recently read a book confirming what I've been saying for years, that he wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving him lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well, because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that you don't need to be a rocket scientist to detect the subtext of this letter. But just in case it's too subliminal for some, let me thrust it into your face right here: Thon is trying to brainwash us. He wants us to believe that it's iconoclastic to fight for what is right; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that Thon has no discernible talents. The only things he has indeed mastered are biological functions. Well, I suppose he's good at convincing people that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us, but Thon would have us believe that careerism brings one closer to nirvana. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Thon is surrounded by odious firebrands who parrot the same nonsense, which is why his conclusions are in conflict with accepted morality. Period, finis, and Q.E.D. You know what? Thon would have us believe that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt impugn the patriotism of Thon's opponents". Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject. So you see, only by taking risks and pushing boundaries with this letter can I create a world in which chauvinism, feudalism, and Fabianism are all but forgotten.

[Metranon]

rofl

this post has the most things going over people's heads since the berlin airlift

[Lucafixt]

I wanted to respond to Mr. Kiss My Ass, Ph.D. earlier, but I was so busy, I simply did not have the time. Nevertheless, what I need to say is so important, I knew I simply had to allocate a few minutes to write a brief letter on the subject. Read on, gentle reader, and hear what I have to say. It is more than a purely historical question to ask, "How did Mr. Ass's reign of terror start?" or even the more urgent question, "How might it end?". No, we must ask, "Is it really Mr. Ass's impression that anyone who disagrees with him is ultimately dotty?" After days of agonized pondering and reflection, I finally came to the conclusion that he either is or elects to be ignorant of scientific principles and methods. Mr. Ass even intentionally misuses scientific terminology to rally for a cause that is completely void of moral, ethical, or legal validity. He recently claimed that mercantalism is the key to world peace. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before.

When Mr. Ass made his puppy-dog habitués wag their little tails by promising to let them inure us to unscrupulous defeatism, I realized for the first time that Mr. Ass just reported that he has a "special" perspective on solecism which carries with it a "special" right to cause (or at least contribute to) a variety of social ills. Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Mr. Ass's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to mollycoddle the most infernal wisenheimers you'll ever see. His power-hungry comments can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having a mind consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. The bottom line is that when Mr. Kiss My Ass, Ph.D. is challenged, Mr. Ass either denies everything or claims that his words were taken out of context and that his enemies are plotting against him.

[Minrott]

If Mr. Ass is a Ph.D., then isn't Mr. Ass in fact Doctror Ass?

[brinstar]

the only real flaw with this thread is that the flames are so goddamn long i don't have the patience to read them all

[Eshelon]

Which is why I began it with a small, easy to read 3 paragraph rant... *sigh* totally ruins the joke when person after person posts 10 paragraph generations.

[Adivina]

Once again, I am writing in response to Eshelon's arguments, and once again, I merely wish to point out that no matter what terms are used, I have had enough of Eshelon's callow quips. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care -- a large enough number to build a better world, a cleaner world, a safer world, and a saner world. In retrospect, he has always been more offensive than most unbalanced vandals. He thinks it would be a great idea to dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed. If I were elected Ruler of the World, my first act of business would be to operate on today's real -- not tomorrow's ideal -- political terrain. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that if we are to reinforce notions of positive self esteem, then we must be guided by a healthy and progressive ideology, not by the asinine and illiterate ideologies that Eshelon promotes. In spite of the fact that questions of Eshelon's motivation and intent are compelling, if I try really, really hard, I can almost see why he would want to defy the rules of logic.

If Eshelon doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere. One does not have to make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up in order to appeal not to the contented and satisfied, but embrace those tormented by suffering, those without peace, the unhappy and the discontented. It is a brassbound person who believes otherwise. I welcome Eshelon's comments. However, Eshelon needs to realize that I overheard one of his sycophants say, "Disreputable dweebs have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to feed the starving, house the homeless, cure the sick, and still find wonder and awe in the sunrise and the moonlight. Something that I have heard repeated several times from various sources -- a sort of "tag line" for Eshelon -- is, "We should go out and give me reason to drop to my knees and beg for mercy. And when we're done with that, we'll all waste taxpayers' money." This is not a direct quote, nor have I heard it from Eshelon's lips directly, but several sources have paraphrased the content to me in near-enough ways that I feel fairly confident it actually was said. And to be honest, I have no trouble believing it.

At the risk of shocking you further, I shall point out that his remonstrations are designed to cause an increase in disease, elitism, crime, and vice. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. It behooves us to remember that at no time in the past did soulless, empty-headed losers shamble through the streets of cities, demanding rights they imagine some supernatural power has bestowed upon them. Is Eshelon's head really buried too deep in the sand to know that his deputies are nothing more than the worst classes of improvident turncoats there are? Whatever the answer, honest people will admit that he is so intolerantly devoted to his own prejudices that his perception of reality is totally warped. Concerned people are not afraid to turn Eshelon's twisted revenge fantasies to our advantage. And sensible people know that Eshelon should think about how his rodomontades lead the worst types of hypocritical used-car salesmen there are to sow the seeds of discord. If Eshelon doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet. That's all I'm going to say in this letter, because if I were to write everything I want to write, I'd be here all night.