Moderator: Dictators in Training
Diekan wrote:1. What has Bush done over the past 5 years that gives you cause to support him fully?
Diekan wrote:2. What has Bush done to make YOUR life, as an American, better?
lyion wrote:Fair enough.Diekan wrote:1. What has Bush done over the past 5 years that gives you cause to support him fully?
He was democratically elected to the white house. Due to this, I support him as our President, and voice my opposition to things he proposes which I do not agree with in a positive manner
Harrison wrote:http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecworks.htm
Thanks.
Mindia wrote:Hell, you don't need values or morals to be president of the United States... all you need is to be a good orator and be able to dazzle people with your charisma and bullshit to become a president (as we saw in 1992-2000), right? Oh wait, no... W proved that wrong in 2000... because he isn't a great orator but he has about 10,000x the values, class and dignity as his predecessor had.
Gidan wrote:Mindia wrote:Hell, you don't need values or morals to be president of the United States... all you need is to be a good orator and be able to dazzle people with your charisma and bullshit to become a president (as we saw in 1992-2000), right? Oh wait, no... W proved that wrong in 2000... because he isn't a great orator but he has about 10,000x the values, class and dignity as his predecessor had.
But he wasn't competing against his predecessor, he was competing against Gore and Kerry. I wouldn't exactly call them the masters of charisma and bullshit
Mindia wrote:Gidan wrote:Mindia wrote:Hell, you don't need values or morals to be president of the United States... all you need is to be a good orator and be able to dazzle people with your charisma and bullshit to become a president (as we saw in 1992-2000), right? Oh wait, no... W proved that wrong in 2000... because he isn't a great orator but he has about 10,000x the values, class and dignity as his predecessor had.
But he wasn't competing against his predecessor, he was competing against Gore and Kerry. I wouldn't exactly call them the masters of charisma and bullshit
He wasn't competing against Kerry in 2000.
lyion wrote:
He was democratically elected to the white house.
Diekan wrote:Now for some rules... yes rules. I don't want to hear about shit he's planning on doing - talk is cheap and until it becomes a reality, it's just that... TALK. Secondly, answer the damn questions, no dancing around it, or trying to change the topic to "Clinton sucked, Bush rules" bullshit.
Mindia wrote:Hell, you don't need values or morals to be president of the United States... all you need is to be a good orator and be able to dazzle people with your charisma and bullshit to become a president (as we saw in 1992-2000), right? Oh wait, no... W proved that wrong in 2000... because he isn't a great orator but he has about 10,000x the values, class and dignity as his predecessor had.
Gidan wrote:lyion wrote:Fair enough.Diekan wrote:1. What has Bush done over the past 5 years that gives you cause to support him fully?
He was democratically elected to the white house. Due to this, I support him as our President, and voice my opposition to things he proposes which I do not agree with in a positive manner
Did you support him when he was in the white house even though he Gore was democratically elected?
Gidan wrote:
Did you support him when he was in the white house even though he Gore was democratically elected?
Gidan wrote:Off topic, does anyone really know why we use the whole Electoral College thing anyway? Why in the world would a country claiming to be a democracy use a system that makes 1 person vote mean more or less based upon the state they live in.
Gidan wrote:Off topic, does anyone really know why we use the whole Electoral College thing anyway? Why in the world would a country claiming to be a democracy use a system that makes 1 person vote mean more or less based upon the state they live in.
xaoshaen wrote:Gidan wrote:Off topic, does anyone really know why we use the whole Electoral College thing anyway? Why in the world would a country claiming to be a democracy use a system that makes 1 person vote mean more or less based upon the state they live in.
I know Martrae pointed it our, but just for emphasis: the U.S. is not a democracy. We never have been, hopefully never will be.
Tikker wrote:Now this I'd like to hear explained
Why do you never want teh USA to be a true democracy?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests