Moderator: Dictators in Training
Azlana wrote:Right.
Sadly, the US has fallen further and further behind the rest of the world on social issues for quite some time now, due to that kind of thought process.
http://www.terra.es/personal2/monolith/00women2.htm
Arlos wrote:Anyway, on "Women never sending their children off to war"... Margret Thatcher sure had problems with that, huh?
Personally I would rather if the sheikh fuckers wouldnt come over here at all.lyion wrote:Personally, I want a woman President just so those Sheikh fucks have to come over here and cowtow to a girl they believe should be walking three paces behind them buried in sheets. The amusement from that possibility is endless.
Gidan wrote:I was reading a bunch of stuff about electing a woman into office. A bunch of women were posting about how they could do just as good or better as persident then men. They all had the same arguments. Women are smarter and that they would never send their children to war. What strikes me as odd is that the idea of never sending their children to war was actually considered a good things by them. They actually thought it was a selling point for electing them to being the commander of the US military! Not wanting to goto war is one thing but being unwilling is completely different. It would weaken us as a country.
I am not aposed to a woman in the white house, however it would need to be a woman that could controle her emotions. A women in office can not attribute their actions to PMS, Wow, another idiot male. She is WAY PAST her PMS years, sounds like another excuse to make the man feel like he is better.they cant play the stupid mind games with world leaders. They can not act like they are the mother of the country, the citizens of this country can not be treated like children or protected like children.
This woman would also have to be somone willing to put her job before her family. You can not put off or cancel trips abroad because you want to spend time with your children.Do you mean like Bush did? He spent less than a month's time doing work in the first 6 months he was in office because he was on vacations with his family. Men tend to have a much easier time putting off the idea of family then women do. Men tend to be willing longer and harder hours then women. If a women is willing to do that and holds herself to that, then that woman has the potential to be just as good a president then anyone else.
Some women may hate me for the way I feel, thats fine. I just feel there are some traits that tend to effect women more then men would make it much harder for a woman to be an effective world leader.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
Martrae wrote: By all means, lets be lemmings and do something just because everyone else does and not because it's right for us. When we do elect a woman president I hope to God it's because she's the best for the job and not because of the perception that we have to be the same as everyone else.
Azlana wrote:I just want to make sure I understand this....someone, Darcler I think, says that a woman wouldn't make a good president...and I post a link listing a series of female presidents, that as far as I know have done a fine job, and from that link you deduce that I'm implying that we should elect a woman as president ONLY BECAUSE OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE - rather than pointing out that other countries move past age old stereotypes and sexism far faster than our nation.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 3 guests