Moderator: Dictators in Training
Vivalicious wrote:Lots of females don't want you to put your penis in their mouths. Some prefer it in their ass.
Vivalicious wrote:Lots of females don't want you to put your penis in their mouths. Some prefer it in their ass.
Gidan wrote:Who would have thought that the religious concervative board would take science out of science classes.
All this is, is a way for tehm to have a way to push creation on the students.
Themosticles wrote:Again, this is NOT about religion.
Themo wrote:it would encourage teachers to discuss various viewpoints
lyion wrote:Naturedidit wrongly stated as fact is just as silly as goddidit stated as fact.Themo wrote:it would encourage teachers to discuss various viewpoints
Discussion and debate are good, and even though secularity and naturalsim are and should be prevalent in science, high school talks do nothing but promote learning, and are hardly damaging, except to those with an agenda.
lyion wrote:I'm sure many have a biased religious agendas, just as many have a biased anti religion agenda.
Stating evolution has gaping holes is not promoting religion or proselytizing. Neither are open discussions and an attempt to learn. It's not like anyones trying to change the scientific method, or anything.
Kansas will join Minnesota, Ohio and New Mexico, all of which have adopted critical analysis of evolution in the last four years.
The new science standards would not eliminate the teaching of evolution entirely, nor would they require that religious views, also known as creationism, be taught, but it would encourage teachers to discuss various viewpoints
Zanchief wrote:When I think of progressive teachings, I think of Kansas. My point is, it's opening up those schools to basically tell kids evolution is wrong and present various (creationism) other alternatives.
I don't even see the need to legislate this, but the reason Kansas is dong this is because they want to teach there kids hocus-pocus alternatives to evolution.
lyion wrote:Zanchief wrote:When I think of progressive teachings, I think of Kansas. My point is, it's opening up those schools to basically tell kids evolution is wrong and present various (creationism) other alternatives.
I don't even see the need to legislate this, but the reason Kansas is dong this is because they want to teach there kids hocus-pocus alternatives to evolution.
I think you are confusing what the fundamentalists want and what is actually being implemented, Zan.
Within those guidelines they could discredit evolution and promote creationism. And that's why they are doing it.
Themosticles wrote:Within those guidelines they could discredit evolution and promote creationism. And that's why they are doing it.
I don't think it will come to this, as I stated before, but this of course is where we disagree. Which is fine.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests