Moderator: Dictators in Training
Vivalicious wrote:Lots of females don't want you to put your penis in their mouths. Some prefer it in their ass.
ClakarEQ wrote:I hope most of the folks here plan on moving out of the country to get a "good job".
I feel unions outlived the useful factor some time ago but we (Americans) wouldn't have gotten here (standard of living) had it not been for them.
So, make jest all you want, I really feel sorry for the folks coming out of school (college) or younger kids (like my own, 5 and 7). They will have shit for a country, hope you like the service and support industry, or maybe be a Dr. otherwise you are fucked and any hope you had of getting a piece of the pie will die along side the unions.
You 20 somethings, better bank every penny you get, you'll be paying for my healthcare and all my fuckups. Worse yet, you'll be fired at 35 with your 2.5 kids and a dog as you watch your job get moved to mexico, china, india, etc.
So be careful for what you wish for.
/sarcasm off
Diekan wrote:
And what is anyone doing about it?
Tuggan wrote:
then 5 years from now china will be pumping out cars even cheaper than hyundai can produce. then toyota and honda will be the next to be laying off its north american employees. then what will you fools have to say? just abuncha dipshits with a slant eyed perspective on your own neighbors and country. oh well though, keep on bashing the american worker and his product... and keep on shovelin the cash into foreign pockets.
Yamori wrote:
And what is anyone doing about it?
Yamori wrote:Anyways, outsourcing and the rest of the "blame the rich" thing is only one half of the coin. It's not wrong - it really is very unhealthy for the country and it will come back to bite outsourcers in the ass in the future. What good is saving several millions if the country's economy slumps in the near future and no one buys your crap because people from India took their job?[/qupte]
Whether or not you or I buys their product is almost irrelevent. There's a world market out there that's more than willing to slap down the marks, pesos, yen, whatever to buy what they want. You don't think companies like McDonalds aren't liking their chops at the idea of putting up the "Golden Arches" in downtown Baghdad?Yamori wrote:But you have to remember, the purpose of business isn't to secure the current comfortable living style of the average American: they aren't charities, they exist solely to make money.[/qupte]
This is true, but when the cost of living is 10 times higher than the average wage and companies that are making billions of dollars a year are sending jobs overseas because they don't want to raise their wages to compensate for the increase in the cost of living - yes - that IS a problem. It's called greed. For the most part, Microsoft, for example, sells plastic disks for hundreds of dollars a pop. Gates is the richest (or at least of the very top richest people) on the planet. Do you really believe that MS needs to send jobs overseas? That's a load of shit. They're sending American jobs overseas so that top execs and the shareholders can line their pockets with even MORE money than they already have.
Is there anything wrong with making money? Hell no there isn't. Where the problem comes into play is when you're already a fucking billionare and you start destroying the lives of entire families and working people so they can finance a 5th mansion in France.
Do you honestly believe there was some mythical shortage of gas, or that big oil industries just had to jack up the price of fuel after the hurricanes? Fuck no they didn't. They saw a golden oppertunity to make astronomical amounts of money and ran with it. They posted RECORD profits for that quarter in the BILLIONS. Do you really think they would have gone bankrupt if they hadn't caused the price of gas to rise to over three dollars a gallon? That's bullshit. They would have been just fine, but instead WE had to pay 75 dollars to fill up our vehicles while they laughed all the way to the bank.Yamori wrote:We should instead be asking, WHY are all these companies outsourcing? Why are they hiring people in other countries?
1) It costs more to have a company primarily in the USA than it does in 2nd world and some 3rd world countries. Why does it cost more?
1a) High taxes in all respect - profit and employee side: proposed and championed by the very same people who whine and bitch and blame the rich about issues like this now I might add.
1b) Unions: particularly, because they are currently INVOLUNTARY and the law forces employers and employees to participate with them. They artificially inflate wages, and make it extremely difficult to re-negotiate things such as Ford's health care policies, which are currently choking the company and dragging it under.
2) The country riddled with legal problems for companies:
2a) Nightmarish bureaucracy and red tape that make it very obnoxious and expensive to start/run a business.
2b) Huge risk for expensive lawsuits regarding employee relations (affirmative action issues [if they sell to the government], sexual harrassment suits [which routinely target companies - not just the offenders], ect)
2c) Blatantly unclear anti-trust laws which pretty much allow any successful business at any time to come under fire for it.
... When you look at all that (and I'm sure there's more), it's at least understandable why large corporations want as little as possible to do with having their business run in the USA.
Instead of just pointing the finger of blame at "greedy people" - attention should also be put on liberal economic policies that have become corrupt and/or useless and get rid of them.~
ShinSplints McGriddles wrote:Taxx talks shit and has no actual skills, noted by the fact he posts here all day from work.
Lyion wrote:Unfortunately, Arabs are notorious cowards and these are people who are easily knuckled under.
NAFTA called for immediately eliminating duties on half of all U.S. goods shipped to Mexico and gradually phasing out other tariffs over a period of about 14 years. Restrictions were to be removed from many categories, including motor vehicles and automotive parts, computers, textiles, and agriculture. The treaty also protected intellectual property rights (patents, copyrights, and trademarks) and outlined the removal of restrictions on investment among the three countries. Provisions regarding worker and environmental protection were added later as a result of supplemental agreements signed in 1993. This agreement was an expansion of the earlier Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement of 1989. Unlike the European Union, NAFTA does not create a set of supranational governmental bodies, nor does it create a body of law which is superior to national law. NAFTA is a treaty under international law. (Under United States law it is classed as a congressional-executive agreement rather than a treaty, but that reflects a peculiar sense of the term "treaty" in United States constitutional law, but that sense is not followed by international law or the laws of other states.)
The agreement was initially pursued by free-trade conservative governments in the US and Canada, led by Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, and US President George H. W. Bush. There was considerable opposition on both sides of the border, but in the United States it was able to secure passage after President Bill Clinton made its passage a major legislative initiative in 1993. After intense political debate and the negotiation of several side agreements, the US House passed NAFTA by 234-200 (132 Republicans and 102 Democrats voting in favor) and the US Senate passed it by 61-38. Some opposition persists to the present day, although labour unions in Canada have recently removed objections to the agreement from their platforms.
What is it the unions are doing that is killing these companys ?
Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.
Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
Diekan wrote:Hey now the Internet and George Bush told me that out sourcing was a good thing! Must be true!.
Lyion wrote:If Hillary wins Texas and Ohio, she'll win the nomination.
Tossica wrote:Seriously, there is NO WAY Sony is going to put HD-DVD out of the game.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests