by brinstar » Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:36 pm
let me tell you something i've learned from working in, around, and with the justice system here in lincoln-- Judge Gale Pokorny is a bit of a loose cannon sometimes. most of the time he's pretty entertaining. i've read several of the 2½ page+ sentencing orders to which the article refers, and i always get a kick out of his editorializing. i have agreed with about 95% of the hundreds of sentences he's handed down since i started working here 3 years ago. usually he handles mostly domestic violence cases, and you can tell he is genuinely concerned about punishing and rehabilitating offenders as well as preserving the rights and the voices of the victims. it is for these and several other reasons that i believe he is a good judge.
however, this sentence crosses the line in my opinion, and the biggest reason is that this kid wasn't even at the party. Pokorny made valid points in his sentencing order regarding the possibilities of alcohol poisoning, violence, vandalism, and the disturbance of public peace-- and fair enough, having 170 people over at your house in the suburbs for a barnburner of a party is never a good idea-- but this kid was out of town visiting his parents when the party occurred. he was charged with this offense because his name was on the lease. the other two guys on the lease who actually threw the party paid fines and walked out of court, whereas this kid has to sleep at the big house for a month. seems backwards to me.
there's probably a side to the story not explained in the article, so tomorrow i'll try to find out more about the case-- but as it stands... bad call.
compost the rich