by araby » Sat Apr 08, 2006 11:53 am
I got what you meant, I don't think stacy could possibly take that the wrong way. though I can't speak for her.
but while I agree that stacy is hot and that kate moss is too skinny, I don't see anything wrong with a bone protruding. there isn't a gauge to measure how much is too skinny unless you consider the average weight in ratio to height or body fat. whichever is being used now...or unless of course the person as an eating disorder.
I weigh 127 (as of two days ago at the dr office on a digital scale) and I am 5'8. you can see my collar bone, my ribs (to a certain degree-I have small boobs hehe so I can't help it) and my pelvis. you can also see muscle mass in my shoulders, arms and stomach...so where someone might find seeing a bone is unattractive or unhealthy even...it's just my frame. I think it can be sexy on the right person, and I'm not tooting my own horn here, I am using myself as an example because I know that my weight seems like a lot when people learn I'm so close to 130-they say "omg really?? you look like you weigh 110 lbs!!"
People do not walk around with their weight written on their foreheads and need not do so, because that number means nothing. I am a healthy, almost 130lb chick who has plenty of muscle mass to meet the thinness a bone would show from. it's not the mark of unsexy..plenty of people find that area of the female body very sexy.
however, too skinny is def too skinny when you look malnourished or over-drugged and under-slept.