by ClakarEQ » Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:34 pm
And you do the same, but everyone else that does multibox agrees with me and your way has been proven to be slower.
Everything about your suggestion is a DUPLICATE, the very word implies slow, lets copy everything to another folder, don't use HD cache, etc etc. So many things about what you are suggesting are just wrong, sorry. You increase disk IO, Processor IO, everything, you don't use any potential re-entrive code, you load potentialy twice the required amount.
Tell me wise one, how does it go faster when you run it from two different dirs?
I know someone that has a really nice AMD box, 2GB ram, 512MB vid card and he quad boxes with full graphics, ALL from one DIR and he even tried (prior to my sound advice) to do exactly as you suggest, and it was SLOWER, NOTICABLE SLOWER.
You check again on how to really multibox and anyone that suggests "make two copies..." bla bla gets shreaded.