9. The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever.
Someone should tell Fox News they are shitting all over the flag.
Moderator: Dictators in Training
10. No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform. However, a flag patch may be affixed to the uniform of military personnel, firemen, policemen, and members of patriotic organizations. The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing. Therefore, the lapel flag pin being a replica, should be worn on the left lapel near the heart.
9. The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever. It should not be embroidered on such articles as cushions or handkerchiefs and the like, printed or otherwise impressed on paper napkins or boxes or anything that is designed for temporary use and discard. Advertising signs should not be fastened to a staff or halyard from which the flag is flown.
10. No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform. However, a flag patch may be affixed to the uniform of military personnel, firemen, policemen, and members of patriotic organizations. The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing. Therefore, the lapel flag pin being a replica, should be worn on the left lapel near the heart.
Donnel wrote:Erodalak wrote:Who needs an education when you are hawt like advina
fixt :P
arlos wrote:Well, the Supreme Court has ruled that burning a flag in protest constitutes an act of protected symbolic speech. Therefore, your interpretation is incorrect. Whether you like it or not, it has been quite firmly established that flag-burning is currently legal and constitutional. That's why banning it requires a constitutional amendment.
As I've said before, personally, I think that burning the flag is extremely rare, and is an incredibly minor issue that the congress shouldn't be worrying about when there's so many other things to deal with. Also, I feel that putting in ANY constitutional amendment that LIMITS freedom in some way is a very bad precedent.
-Arlos
Zanchief wrote:They don't have any intention of passing this, they just want a black list of every person who votes against it so they can point and say "look at him, he hates america" come election time. The worst part is it will work.
arlos wrote:Uh, Mindia, sorry to contradict you here, but according to the law, rules and guidelines regulating respect for the US flag, wearing that shirt WOULD violate those principles. Look at the post Donnel made, where he copied the entire set of law/rules/regulations, no doubt from a government website. Here's the pertinent points in question:4. The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free. Bunting of blue, white, and red, always arranged with the blue above, the white in the middle, and the red below, should be used for covering a speaker's desk, draping the front of the platform, and for decoration in general.
9. The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever. It should not be embroidered on such articles as cushions or handkerchiefs and the like, printed or otherwise impressed on paper napkins or boxes or anything that is designed for temporary use and discard. Advertising signs should not be fastened to a staff or halyard from which the flag is flown.
10. No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform. However, a flag patch may be affixed to the uniform of military personnel, firemen, policemen, and members of patriotic organizations. The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing. Therefore, the lapel flag pin being a replica, should be worn on the left lapel near the heart.
I realize quite well that the use of a flag-print shirt is on a whole different level than burning the flag in protest, though. So no, I wouldn't even begin to equate those two things, no matter what my opinion is on the legality of flag-burning.
-Arlos
Eziekial wrote:OK Mindia, I re-read my post and your post numerous times to see if "it" would sink in. Since "it" has not, please be so kind to explain in detail how you feel an amendment to our constitution banning a practice (which by virtue of it's place in our legal system would have some consequence for violations) makes punishment for that said practice "civil" and tell me how my linear argument is flawed. I appreciate your time to respond and look forward to this clarification.
Tuggan wrote:The Kizzy wrote:You dont count
I know, only the people with ZERO concept on what this country is/was supposed to be about count these days. Its a disgrace.
Zanchief wrote:Harrison wrote:I'm not dead
Fucker never listens to me. That's it, I'm an atheist.
The Kizzy wrote:Tuggan wrote:The Kizzy wrote:You dont count
I know, only the people with ZERO concept on what this country is/was supposed to be about count these days. Its a disgrace.
I actually read Tuggan as Tikker and I was thinking the Canadian needs to STFU. Sorry about that
Donnel wrote:Erodalak wrote:Who needs an education when you are hawt like advina
fixt :P
Adivina wrote:Spazz,
I will say to you what I say to everyone who bitches that we are in such a horrible situation. Until you get up in the morning and "run" the workings of the country everyday, I don't see where you get off to bitch that the president is awful. Honestly, I do not agree with a lot of his policies or views, but he has a very difficult and important job, and I don't think I could handle doing it, do you really think you could?
You are bitching about his tax bracket and the money he makes, fuck if I were under the stress of making decisions for an entire country, I sure as hell would expect to be paid well.
Narrock wrote:arlos wrote:Uh, Mindia, sorry to contradict you here, but according to the law, rules and guidelines regulating respect for the US flag, wearing that shirt WOULD violate those principles. Look at the post Donnel made, where he copied the entire set of law/rules/regulations, no doubt from a government website. Here's the pertinent points in question:4. The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free. Bunting of blue, white, and red, always arranged with the blue above, the white in the middle, and the red below, should be used for covering a speaker's desk, draping the front of the platform, and for decoration in general.
9. The flag should never be used for advertising purposes in any manner whatsoever. It should not be embroidered on such articles as cushions or handkerchiefs and the like, printed or otherwise impressed on paper napkins or boxes or anything that is designed for temporary use and discard. Advertising signs should not be fastened to a staff or halyard from which the flag is flown.
10. No part of the flag should ever be used as a costume or athletic uniform. However, a flag patch may be affixed to the uniform of military personnel, firemen, policemen, and members of patriotic organizations. The flag represents a living country and is itself considered a living thing. Therefore, the lapel flag pin being a replica, should be worn on the left lapel near the heart.
I realize quite well that the use of a flag-print shirt is on a whole different level than burning the flag in protest, though. So no, I wouldn't even begin to equate those two things, no matter what my opinion is on the legality of flag-burning.
-Arlos
Well, to me, someone wearing a U.S. flag is being patriotic. It is not at all offensive.
And last but not least they wanna controll just about every part of your personnel life
Hey im not sayin its a good idea but that type of thinking is real populer right now.
Our awsome rulers think we do homie
... and they totally live by a diffrent set of rules than us. IMO that makes them rulers
A shirt and the flag are 2 diffrent things silly
how bout flying it upside down do you think people should get in trubble for that too ??
... but that flag just like every other symbol MEANS DIFFRENT SHIT TO DIFFRENT PEOPLE
Narrock wrote:It all comes down to having respect for your country.
spazz wrote:No i dont need to live somewhere where my rights really are trampled dickhead I live in america where WE are promised freedom. Just cuz we are not ruled by the taliban yet does not mean the things going on in this country are a good representation of freedom. I dont hate my country i just want it to live up to the promises it makes. Freedom does not mean the right to shop where you want and sorta kinda be allowed to say what you wanna say . It means YOU OWN YOu and baby that isnt whats goin on here.
One more thing. Yea we vote for em and im aware of that dipshit but if you cant see how they RULE and not lead well than your blind. They dont live by the same rules as us. They are in a tax bracket higher than a cloud. They are not accountable for there actions. They vote themselves pay raises. And last but not least they wanna controll just about every part of your personnel life.
Well, to me, someone wearing a U.S. flag is being patriotic. It is not at all offensive.
Tuggan wrote:Adivina wrote:Spazz,
I will say to you what I say to everyone who bitches that we are in such a horrible situation. Until you get up in the morning and "run" the workings of the country everyday, I don't see where you get off to bitch that the president is awful. Honestly, I do not agree with a lot of his policies or views, but he has a very difficult and important job, and I don't think I could handle doing it, do you really think you could?
You are bitching about his tax bracket and the money he makes, fuck if I were under the stress of making decisions for an entire country, I sure as hell would expect to be paid well.
He isnt speaking only about president Bush. Hes a very small fraction of the overall problem.
Donnel wrote:Erodalak wrote:Who needs an education when you are hawt like advina
fixt :P
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests