Moderator: Dictators in Training
spazz wrote:* Israel goes out of its way to avoid taking out innocent civilians in these conflicts
bullshit
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
"You wanted an open war, you will have an open war," Nasrallah said. "You don't know who you are fighting today. You are fighting the children of Mohammed, ali Hassan and Hussein. You chose the war to fight against people who believe in their pride."
Lueyen wrote:spazz wrote:* Israel goes out of its way to avoid taking out innocent civilians in these conflicts
bullshit
Israel has issued warnings to the Lebanese government to evacuate civilians around targets they intend to destroy. Israelie aircraft droped pamphlets warning civilians to stay away from Hezbollah targets. In acts like this they also warn the Hebollah, placing thier military personel in greater danger, decreasing the chance of success in thier attacks, all in an effort to avoid civilian casualties.
If warning your enemy that you intend to attack so that civilians can be evacuated isn't going out of your way to avoid civilian deaths I don't know what is.
arlos wrote:. Short of killing EVERYONE
Vivalicious wrote:Lots of females don't want you to put your penis in their mouths. Some prefer it in their ass.
arlos wrote:If Vietnam taught the world anything, it should've taught us that a conventional miltiary campaign against a force that is functionally a disgruntled and loosely organized civilian organization is effectively doomed to failure. Short of killing EVERYONE, how do you kill the militants and not civilians, assuming they're not actively shooting at you at the time? Remember, killing civilians just worsens your problem, as it just creates MORE militants.
Unless the civilian population wants to help the invading foreign power, there is no way whatsoever that a standard military is going to be able to eliminate a guerella movement. Period. The US couldn't do it in Vietnam, we haven't been able to do it in Iraq, and Israel hasn't been able to do it in 40+ years of fighting.
Again, I ask you, look at the results of the recent incursion: We've gone from a widely supported referendum about to take place that would've effectively forced Hamas to recognize Israel's right to exist, which is the first step in establishing a real peace. Now? More rockets are being fired than ever, more civilians have died, which gives rise to the next generation of terrorists and militants, and they not only haven't recovered the guy they were initially going after, two MORE hostages have been taken.
-Arlos
Raymond S. Kraft wrote:The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined always win.
Those who are willing to be the most ruthless always win. The pacifists always lose, because the anti-pacifists kill them.
Eziekial wrote:That's a well thought out post but unfortunately, based on common misconceptions. The US military did not fail in Vietnam, it was by all accounts, wildly successful.
Isreal needs to fight a war they should have fought a long time ago and be done with it. If they lose, they lose. If they win, great they can start paying us back for all the aid we've sent them over the last 50 years.
Jay wrote:Eziekial wrote:That's a well thought out post but unfortunately, based on common misconceptions. The US military did not fail in Vietnam, it was by all accounts, wildly successful.
Isreal needs to fight a war they should have fought a long time ago and be done with it. If they lose, they lose. If they win, great they can start paying us back for all the aid we've sent them over the last 50 years.
How is spending 35 billion dollars to lose soldiers in a war and leaving the country still in a state of communism wildly successful?
Minrott wrote:Let's see. 58,000 of our own dead, over 450,000 NVA and VC and civilians dead.
Although I agree with Jay.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests