Moderator: Dictators in Training
Gargamellow wrote:I am bi-polar.
But I don't take meds. Haven't since my grandma died. Got a problem with it?
Besides, I don't need them. I prefer to use my energy for learning rather than dumb it down just because some anal buttplugs can't handle me.
And even in my calmest moment, I still agree to searching kids in schools to prevent shootings and drug sales on school grounds.
Diekan wrote:For the record I am against strip searching anyone for any reason unless you're an convicted inmate.
But, I want to know what rights you think kids have, Gid?
Besides the usual right to life - what "rights" do they have?
The sooner we stop treating kids like adults and letting them act like adults the better off we'll all be.
Gargamellow wrote:Ok..I see your point. I would allow only searching by officers. I guess the strip searching is a little dramatic. But what happens when some moron has a sack of crack shoved in his underwear and he gets my kid high on that shit in between classes? I am killing me a crack dealer, that's what is going to happen.
Gargamellow wrote:It is too bad that parenting is being hurt by the sociological responsibilities put on the women of our society. Not only are the women now required to work, but the majority of men are still treating women the same as they were before the civil rights movement, not to mention lack of helping out in the home.
Sithos wrote:Those who are against search and seizures at schools will also be the loudest about the failings of the government and the school system as a whole when something happens.
I am all for keeping schools safe even insofar as strip searching if warranted (In extreme situations and only if the parent signs a waiver to allow such) with the inference that any such activity will be overseen by Law Enforcement who should be present prior to it happening. I can see the outraged parents and/or students when a 14-18 year old girl gets strip searched. Prime grounds for a lawsuit right there (The bad man touched me type of claims).
I am speaking as a father with 2 children. I'd rather them be safe. If that means searching their bags,clothing etc I'm for it.
Gargamellow wrote:Gidan: If we went back to one parent in the home society, we would all be living at the "poverty" level. Life costs too much these days. Not to mention, most women would rather have a job. Not me, though. But I am going to do it so that my children have a fighting chance. I currently have $30,000 insurance policy on myself for my kids because I can't afford anything more solid right now. It is cost efficient at least for the next ten years. By then I should be able to get something they can really rely on.
I fear for the future of this country. Not because of terrorists, but because our children aren't getting the love and attention they need fom their babysitters. Instead, they are raising each other. And it is getting ugly out there.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests