Sentro wrote:Right now i would say we prolly need to stay in Iraq for the simple fact we fucked up and took out a leader who yes was bad but had good control over his people weather it was the wrong way to have it or not.
As much as I think the war is wrong on many levels, this is one of those dug your grave now die in it statements. I agree with you though, and can only imagine your daily anxiety.
However our presence in Iraq or lack of it, would not make a threat here any greater or less. In fact I think this war has made threats here far greater. You make it sound as if we don't have our own Al-crazy cells here. I thought the past few terrorist busts in both the UK and the US are from our own citizens. This war has created something out of nothing and that something is hate. We've created a hate that our own citizens feel they must act against. This hate wouldn't exist had we not created it.
Now as for these efp, ied, etc. You know necessity is the mother of invention (or however it goes), whatever the US does to protect the troops invention will nullify to complete the task at hand. If the enemy wants to kill you and the best effort on their part is EFP's, the US would be foolish to think more armor is going to "fix" it. All it will do is force the creation of EFP rev2.0.
There is no good way to handle what has been done, we are screwed regardless, there will be no trophies at the end of this game.
Side note, I also agree with Lyion and Iran should be dealt with using covert ops type activities, any sort of invasion tactic would be 100% fool hardy, however if history has anything to say about it, Bush will probably invade before his term is done LOL