A controversy is brewing over Snapple labels
Suit disputes 'all natural' claim
Friday, July 06, 2007
BY GREG SAITZ
Star-Ledger Staff
Snapple teas and juice drinks claim on their labels to be "all natural" and "made from the best stuff on Earth."
A lawsuit filed in New Jersey Superior Court and moved to federal court last week begs to differ. The complaint, filed against Snapple and its parent, Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages, charges the use of high-fructose corn syrup in the drinks renders the "all natural" claim false and deceptive.
"The representation that something is all natural, as far as we're concerned, requires the product be all natural," said East Brunswick attorney Philip Tortoreti, who filed the complaint on behalf of Morganville resident Stacy Holk. "And high-fructose corn syrup is not all natural."
The lawsuit, which seeks class-action status for New Jersey residents who drank certain Snapple teas and juice drinks during the past six years, wants a judge to force the company to alter its labeling and refund consumers.
If successful, the legal action could cost Cadbury Schweppes millions of dollars, based on its reported Snapple sales of more than $5 million a year in New Jersey.
The case is one of a small but growing number of actions consumers and consumer rights groups are pursuing regarding food labeling or food ingredients.
The Snapple complaint, originally filed May 18 in Superior Court in Freehold, came just months after Cadbury Schweppes said it would revise the labeling on its 7Up soda. The company made changes after receiving complaints its new ad campaign promoting 7Up as "all natural" was deceptive because the soda contains high-fructose corn syrup.
High-fructose corn syrup is made from corn starch that is processed with enzymes to create glucose and fructose. Critics of the sweetener charge it is far from natural because of the multi-step process required to create it.
"Our products and packaging meet all regulatory and legal requirements," said Chris Barnes, a spokesman for Cadbury Schweppes Americas Beverages. "The plaintiff's claims are without merit, and we plan to defend against them vigorously."
Last month, Cadbury Schweppes said it would likely sell its U.S. beverage unit and focus on its confectionery business. And yesterday, Coca-Cola said it was considering a bid to buy Snapple.
The New Jersey lawsuit also accuses Snapple of false labeling with its Acai Blackberry Juice, which has depictions of blackberries and an arrow pointing to an acai berry with the phrase, "All together now -- it's Ah-Sigh-Ee."
"Under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, I don't see how they can represent this to be an acai blackberry drink when there is no acai or blackberry in the drink," Tortoreti said. "Indeed, there is only pear juice."
The attorney said this is the first lawsuit he's aware of against Snapple regarding its all-natural claims. But in the early 1990s, California health officials questioned claims by Snapple, then under different ownership, that its products were all natural, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times.
The inquiry focused on high-fructose corn syrup. Its outcome could not be determined; a spokeswoman for the California Department of Public Health said records from that period are no longer available.
The Food and Drug Administration said the term "natural" is not defined in its laws or regulations. However, "the agency has not objected to the use of the term on food labels provided it is used in a manner that is truthful and not misleading," an FDA spokesman wrote in an e-mail.
Tom Montville, a professor of food science at Rutgers University, said no chemicals are added in creating high-fructose corn syrup.
"I feel very justified in saying it's all natural," Montville said. "Among food scientists, it's a given."
But Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University and author of several books, said making high-fructose corn syrup requires more than minimal processing and doesn't qualify as natural. "I think that if it requires two separate enzyme digestions it moves it into another category," Nestle said from Australia, where she was giving a presentation. "High-fructose corn syrup is a miracle of modern food technology -- it's turning starch into sugars."
Cadbury Schweppes' labeling change on 7Up came after the Center for Science in the Public Interest threatened to sue the company. The nonprofit group also was involved in a Florida lawsuit filed against Kraft Foods earlier this year alleging Kraft's Capri Sun juice drink was deceptively marketed as all natural when it contained high-fructose corn syrup.
The lawsuit was dropped after the center learned Kraft was in the process of removing the phrase "all natural" from Capri Sun labels. Steve Gardner, litigation director for the organization, said those two cases and the Snapple lawsuit are the only legal actions he was aware of related to the issue.
The group was in contact with one of the attorneys who brought the Snapple case and at one point considered joining in the lawsuit, Gardner said. The center also is involved in a federal lawsuit in New Jersey against Coca-Cola and Nestle USA regarding their marketing and labeling of Enviga, a sweetened green tea drink that is presented as a calorie burner.
Greg Saitz may be reached at
gsaitz@starledger.com or (973) 392-7946.