For tikker

Where everyone discusses football, and two dorks try to pretend people actually like the NBA and spam what should be in PMs.

Moderators: Mop, Dictators in Training

For tikker

Postby Diekan » Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:39 am

and all the other NE haters...

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/st ... log/071015

Right after Junior Seau's interception clinched the Patriots' 48-27 victory in Dallas on Sunday, my BlackBerry vibrated with a six-word text from my friend Willy:


Matthew Emmons-US PRESSWIRE

Don't expect to see Tom Brady "take a knee" anytime soon.
"Here comes the Eff You TD."

Three minutes later, it happened: Fourth-string running back Kyle Eckel rammed home a fourth-and-1 carry with 19 seconds remaining in a 14-point game. Normally, you take a knee there ... but not this year. Back in the mid-'80s, every time the Celtics walked off an opposing floor after a hard-fought road victory, a giddy Kevin McHale clenched his fists, raised his Frankenstein arms above his head and showed off his victorious armpits. This was the hairy victory cigar of the Bird era. Maybe the 2007 Patriots don't have anything as magical as McHale's pits, but they do have the "Eff You TD." It's their little way of telling the other 31 teams, "You took shots at us after the Jets game, you discredited our three Super Bowls, you pretended we were the only team stealing opposing signals when everyone does it, so you know what? Eff you."

You might remember me bringing this up in my Week 4 picks column: "Yeah, it's wrong to run up the score. I'd be the first one to admit it. But it's a natural reaction to the way they were vilified for two straight weeks. The rest of the nation turned them into a mutant cross between Cobra Kai and the Yankees, so screw it, they're acting like the Cobra Kai Yankees. Can you blame them? I can't answer that one objectively, so I won't try. But if you don't think they'll be running up the score in Cincinnati on Monday night, you're crazy."

What happened in that Bengals game? Leading by 14 points with nine minutes left, the Pats commenced a climactic 85-yard drive by putting Brady in the shotgun, then throwing five straight times before following it up with three Sammy Morris handoffs that brought them to Cincy's 14-yard line with 3:24 remaining. Teams always run out the clock, make the opposing team burn the rest of its timeouts and kick the game-clinching field goal here, right? Not the 2007 Cobra Kai Yankees. Coming off a Cincy timeout, Brady nailed Moss for a 14-yard touchdown. In other words, eff you.

As you might have heard by now, the Patriots are 6-0, they've outscored opponents by a 230-92 margin, and Tom Brady might quintuple Gus Frerotte's QB rating before everything's said and done. In each of those six wins, they specifically went for a meaningless touchdown just to stick it to their opponents. Here's the complete list:


Week 1 at New York Jets (38-14): 1-yard TD by Heath Evans, 1:58 left.

Week 2 vs. San Diego (38-14): 3-yard TD by Sammy Morris, 3:18 left.


Week 3 vs. Buffalo (38-7): 45-yard TD catch by Randy Moss, 10:22 left.

Week 4 at Cincy (34-17): 14-yard TD catch by Randy Moss, 3:18 left.

Week 5 vs. Cleveland (34-17): 15-yard fumble return TD by Randall Gay, 0:42 left.


(Important note: This came one play after the Pats failed to convert the "Eff You TD" on fourth-and-goal from Cleveland's 4 when Brady just missed Kyle Brady in the end zone.)


Week 6 vs. Dallas (48-27): 1-yard TD run by Kyle Eckel, 0:19 left.




Matthew Emmons/US Presswire

Randy Moss and the Pats have outscored their opponents 230-92 in their 6-0 start.
What does this all mean, other than we should start preparing ourselves for the first 100-point game in NFL history against the Jets in Week 15? We have our first potentially dominant team of the hard-cap era, but more importantly, we have our first true NFL villain since the Raiders in the late-'70s. People hate this team. They want them to lose. It's like having the '96 Bulls back, only if everyone despised them and MJ played garbage-time minutes just to make sure every opponent lost by 20-plus points.

Regardless of how you feel about the 2007 Patriots, at the very least, you have to admit the following three things:

1. You haven't seen football played this well in a long time. Three weeks ago, Malcolm Gladwell e-mailed me to say he was heading to Europe and wanted to know if there was a Web site that allowed him to buy a game tape of the Pats-Bengals game and have it Fed Ex'ed to him. When I asked why he didn't TiVo the game and just watch it when he came back, Gladwell explained he didn't want to wait that long -- the Pats were playing at such a high level, he was fascinated with them in a way that went beyond football. And it's true. We haven't seen anything like this with professional sports in a while. When Dallas took the lead in the third quarter Sunday, the thing that amazed me wasn't that it happened, but how assured I was the Patriots would immediately answer with a score. There was no doubt in my mind. Honestly, I haven't felt this way about a Boston team since the '86 Celtics.

2. Barring injuries, it's going to be an enormous, enormous deal if somebody beats New England this season. That's the sign of a truly great team, regardless of the sport. During my sophomore year in college, I remember watching the '89 Niners and thinking, "There's no way in hell they can be beaten. You'd need about 35 things to happen." As it turned out, they outscored their opponents by a 442-253 margin in the regular season, lost two games by a total of five points and rolled through their three playoff opponents by the unfathomable score of 126-26. Yeah, the '92 Cowboys were great; so were the '94 Niners and the '98 Broncos. But the '89 Niners were on a different level, and we haven't seen anything like it since. Now we're seeing it again.


Tim Heitman/US Presswire

Wes Welker has 11 catches in the destruction of Dallas.
3. It's fun to have a old-school villain in sports again, right? There's a reason every sports movie has a bad guy in it. There's a reason "USA 4, USSR 3" was the single greatest moment in American sports history. There's a reason people enjoy hating the Yankees and Duke as much as they do.

Over the past 25 years, we've found more and more ways to become attached to sporting events -- there are fantasy teams, office pools, gambling and everything else. On Sundays during the NFL season, I'm rooting for so many different things that I can't even keep track of everything. But here's a case in which sports has been reduced to the purest form: A great football team broke the rules and paid the price; media members and NFL folks had a field day excoriating the team for what happened; somewhere along the line, people decided the team's Super Bowls were tainted even though the NFL didn't send out its much-discussed memo about videotaping opposing signals until September 2006; and that's when the team made the collective decision, "You know what? Eff you!"

It's a two-word phrase that can't be printed on ESPN.com, but it's become the mantra of the 2007 Patriots season. Eff you. You can see it with every rubbing-it-in touchdown in the fourth quarter, as well as every "Get 'em a body bag ... YEAHHHHHHHHH!" reaction on the sidelines after it happens. You can see it with Brady's ticked-off game face that hasn't changed for five straight weeks. You can see it with Belichick's super-satisfied grin during the postgame handshake with the opposing coach -- especially with Wade Phillips, who made the fatal mistake of taking a shot at the Pats this week, when Belichick looked liked he was dying to tell him, "Man, imagine what the score could have been had if we were allowed to videotape your terrible coaching signals!"


It's a great football team with an even greater edge. If you're rooting against them, you hate them for it. If you're rooting for them, you love it and feel the same way. Best of all, there's no middle ground. Maybe the 2007 Pats were caught stealing signals, but only one signal matters anymore: two middle fingers turned toward the sky.


They haven't put up LESS than 30 points a game - for 6 games straight now.
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

Re: For tikker

Postby Tikker » Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:46 am

you realize they've only played 2 real teams to date, yeah?

yes they're playing awesome right now, but don't crown them until they beat a real AFC team (there's no one in the NFC that would even make the playoffs in the AFC)
Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Re: For tikker

Postby Diekan » Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:08 am

In all fairness - Indy is going to be the true test for the Patriots this year.

I really don't expect Indy to win, but anything is possible I suppose.

I'm not worried about NE scoring. Too many weapons. Hell, with just having Moss out there is going to create so many oppertunities. They'll either have to double cover him with a CB and N/D back, which opens up man coverage on Welker and co., or they'll have to stick a CB on him solo and hope for the best. And, we all know how damn dangerous Moss can be under single coverage ESPECIALLY with the likes of Brady throwing to him.

Maroney is still out this weekend's game against Miami, but he will be back for the Indy game. As will Morris.

Indy's D is going will have nightmares about how to stop this offense. They try to jam up the line and put 8 in the pocket to stop the run - Brady to Moss, Brady to Welker, Brady to Gaffney, Brady to Stallworth... never mind the damage that can be done with Watson and Rivers. Indy tries to pass protect they'll have to find a way to stop Evans / Faulk / Maroney / Morris.

Indy is going to have their hands full. And with BB being the master of the 3 - 4.... yeah... it's going to be a hard game for the Colts.

Then you've got the D with Brusci, Vrable, Seau (who should be back for the Indy game), Hobbs and Samuel.

The ONLY thing that I am worried about right now is whether or not Samuel is going to be able to cover Harrison. That match up has proven to be problematic for the Pats in the past. Harrison has the height and speed on Samuel. Maybe they'll switch up and put Hobbs on him... maybe they'll just run the dime or nickle and stick an extra defender on him... who knows... but if they can contain Harrison well enough...
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

Re: For tikker

Postby Tikker » Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:12 am

I don't think you can just take Harrison out, and expect that to stop the pats

Wayne is just as dangerous, and dallas clark is very under rated

I actually don't think the colts match up that well against the pats

I think pats will have a tougher time with a good ball control team. only real way to stop an offense with that many weapons is to keep them off the field. NE hasn't been all that stingy on defense, they're just blowing the doors off offensively
Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Re: For tikker

Postby Diekan » Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:18 am

Wayne and Clark are dangerous I agree.

But, I have more fear of that Manning / Harrison combo than I do with the others. It's not so much shutting Harrison down alone as it is keeping him under control. Harrison, in the past, has been Manning's favorite target - if Samuel can't cover him or leaves him open - Manning will gun it to him and gain big yardage - every time.

I'm just saying if they put Samuel on Harrison alone, it could be trouble.

I agree, you can't JUST take Harrison out alone and call it good. Clarck and Wayne will own you. But, if Harrison isn't controlled - there's going to be some big gains made by Indy and points put on the board.
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

Re: For tikker

Postby Tikker » Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:23 am

it'll be interesting to see them play top end talent (i still think the colt's D sucks tho)

Steelers haven't played a really good team yet either (seattle pretty mediocre imo)
Tikker
NT Legend
NT Legend
 
Posts: 14294
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 5:22 pm

Re: For tikker

Postby Diekan » Thu Oct 18, 2007 6:05 pm

Just saw Inside the NFL and noticed a couple of things I didn't pick up on during the season.

Holy shit - do you realize that NE has only had to punt 13 times this ENTIRE season? Brady could have had SEVEN touchdowns in that Cowboys game, but two were called back. That was against an undefeated team.

Wow.. just wow...
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am

Re: For tikker

Postby Griever » Fri Oct 19, 2007 7:42 am

I actually cannot wait to see the Patriots and Redskins play in two weeks. I think our defense matches up extremely well with you guys. There is no doubt that you will get your points, but I think you will be held under 30 for the first time this year.

Overall, the Patriots have a way better offense than we do and your defense is just as good as ours. I expect it to be a Patriots win but I think its going to be an amazing game.

I'll catch up with you next weekend so we can talk some trash.
Griever
NT Veteran
NT Veteran
 
Posts: 1283
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 8:34 am
Location: Northern Virginia

Re: For tikker

Postby Diekan » Fri Oct 19, 2007 2:21 pm

Washington's D doesn't play around - they've got a STRONG game. It *shouldn't* be a blow out.
User avatar
Diekan
NT Deity
NT Deity
 
Posts: 5736
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:14 am


Return to Sports and LEEZure

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

cron