Martrae wrote:ClakarEQ wrote:Why do you feel the local folks are more trustworthy and/or more effecient with your money? You realize the corruption at the big fish level is equally if not more corrupt at the local level. You are a systems guy, and IT guy, you know the benefit of a standard, one policy, etc. Why would you want 100's of local governments makeing who knows what kinds of decisions, when you could have 1 government to put down a blanket policy? You'll get screwed equally by both in the end.
They are more efficient for the simple reason there are less of their hands the money goes thru before it reaches people. There are less people on the payroll, less red tape set in place by people who are unfamiliar with what each individual area needs, and a lot less hassle.
I don't know if what you've said is true or not, but less hands also makes it easier to skim, as I'm sure you know, the less folks involved with corruption the easier it is to hide, and harder it is to find. I see your point though, involving the feds is also working at a slower than snail pace.