by araby » Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:13 am
Sounds to me like Diekan is blaming poor parenting for the uneducated, lazy population. I have to agree.
I don't think he meant that Ron Paul would create better parents directly.
However, I do think that having someone in the Presidency who has paved his own way, as well as the way for his own children, would be the right kind of influence, ultimately, for the American people. how?
For starters, taking away these wasted systems we throw money away on and encouraging folks to pay their own way-healthcare for starters. The system is broken and doesn't work. Electing a president who continues to create programs that use taxpayer money to fund them will continue to make a problem worse. By voting for Obama or Hillary, you'll be doing that. They believe in government providing for the people. I do not.
I'd like a president, like Ron Paul, who believes in working to contribute, paying your own way and setting yourself and your kids up for success, not to take from other people-other taxpayers.
Ron Paul would try to bring troops home, uniting families and staying out of the affairs of other countries. That sounds like an excellent way of improving the American family.
If we brought home every physical body we've sent to occupy other countries, we could protect our borders with physical bodies, not some nazi-german fence around this country. A fucking fence...I still can't believe folks think a fence is okay.
He would work for eliminating big government, giving the states rights, which I believe would ultimately get our people motivated at the local level to start thinking about what matters to them. Our issues have all gone to the Fed level...and we're operating at a huge level to try to keep the citizens happy and nationally, it doesn't work. You can see through this election year so far, just how split we are, and as Diekan said, most people aren't split because of the issues, it's because they think Obama is charming and is a great speaker, and the rest support McCain whose voting record is MUCH more liberal than someone like Ron Paul, but the uneducated voter doesn't even know the difference anymore, much less the Republican party, because if they did, they'd know a conservative Republican when they saw one. (Ron Paul.)
I can't fathom how a person's support goes from Ron Paul, to Barack Obama. They aren't even close to the same ideas. Again, I won't be voting for the Democratic party no matter who wins the nomination. Their view on the issues is fucked. You're getting the same thing no matter who it'll be, Hillary and Obama are essentially the same candidate minus the personality differences. There's no comparison whatsoever to the conservative views Ron Paul has.