As for:
(I don't recall if I was the one that responded, don't feel like checking)I'd also like to re-pose the hypothetical about technological advances affecting pro-choice views based on viability outside the womb; only one person answered earlier in the thread.
I personally don't agree with, just as I do not agree with designer babies, however I will never push my opinion of this onto them outside of telling them what I think. I would never ask or attempt to make it "law" or something like that.
This is one of those areas where science and technology cross the line IMO. You get dangerously close to the creation of man completely void of woman and for me, that's just too much.
At the end of the day, I'm of the opinion that you should not be able to legally force someone to do something that is against their will, so technology will never have a bearing on my pro-choice selection.
I can see my argument being a bit hypocritical along with someone attempting to use it against me (e.g. science has made abortion possible, science can make designer babies or "keep alive" a zygote to the point of "birth"), and this is why the issue will be forever grey.