Tikker wrote:so
what do you do for a living Flink
Moderator: Dictators in Training
Tikker wrote:so
what do you do for a living Flink
KaiineTN wrote: Hey guys, who do you think is gonna win the NBA Finals?
Hey Flink, what do you do for a living?KaiineTN wrote: Hey what did everyone think of the Charlie Sheen interview?
Hey Flink, what do you do for a living?KaiineTN wrote: Guys I just found out I have an inoperable tumor...
Hey Flink, what do you do for a living?
leah wrote:i am forever grateful to my gym teacher for drilling that skill into me during drivers' ed
leah wrote:isn't the only difference the length? i feel like it would take too long to smoke something that long, ha.
KaiineTN wrote:Race should not be of any consideration regarding employment, though, a business owner certainly should have the right to discriminate based on race if he wants. After all, it is his company, and he should be able to choose who works for him and who doesn't. Now, if you think that his company is racially discriminating, you can boycott their products and put pressure on him. Let society punish poor business decisions. This is really only applicable to small companies, because when we're talking on a corporate level and ownership is distributed among many people, no one really has that right to discriminate any more.
With maternity leave, personally I believe a company should allow the leave to take place and guarantee her job is there for her when she is able to return, but I don't think that is necessarily a right for a woman. It is more of a perk offered by the company (one that may not be tolerated if it wasn't there, but a perk nonetheless). Even more so if it is a paid maternity leave. The same goes with any sort of disability leave. Obviously if the company is responsible for the disability, things are different, but if not, they should not need to wait on the employee to get better and keep his position available for him.
As far as contracts go, they must be honored. Providing a court system and enforcing contracts is one of the primary responsibilities of government. If previous contract obligations are driving the company into the ground, and parties can't agree on reworking the contract, it will be the death of the company, and whoever picks up the pieces after bankruptcy court can start fresh.
The product recall dilemma is a difficult choice from a business perspective. Many recalls work in favor of the company though because it acts as a major publicity stunt. It generates a ton of free press, and makes your brand seem more trustworthy in the long run. It all comes down to cost, and whether your company can afford the recall. If not, are you willing to sell off or borrow against assets to fund the recall, even if it causes you to go under? The ownership of the company probably plays a big role in the decision as well. It's much more difficult for a corporation to hide the problem under the rug than it is for a small business. I'd like to say that you are responsible for the products you provide, and that if defects exist, you should correct it, or at the very least, publicly announce it. If you become aware of a defect and do nothing, and continue to sell the product as if nothing is wrong, then to me it seems to border on fraud.
leah wrote:i am forever grateful to my gym teacher for drilling that skill into me during drivers' ed
leah wrote:isn't the only difference the length? i feel like it would take too long to smoke something that long, ha.
Jay wrote:Hey Flink, what do you do for a living?
Zanchief wrote:Why should a company have to fit the financial burden of a woman like Leah getting herself knocked up.
Markarado wrote:You're right, his views aren't unique. I agree with most of them. Hell, a lot of people do.
We all agree that change needs to take place, but clearly Americans are going in opposite extremes. I think we can all agree that something extreme needs to happen. I certainly hope it's more to the Republican/Tea Party side =)
To reply to Brinstar - who the are the companies supposed to reap from? The blue and white collar worker who now don't have spending power? Or the 100's of millions Obama gave out? For the record, I'm still not sure where I stand on Obama giving the cash out....
So yah I'm still that conservatie most of you despise, and I still live in Malaysia!
I'm seriously pissed at my country, I'm almost ashamed to call myself an American, all of us should be embarrassed of what we've become, what we've let happen to this wonderful place.
ClakarEQ wrote:hehe, aye I know, GR is where it's at, I see the boom there too , I've got a good job, good pay though, I'm not complaining about that.
I'm a white collar guy making great money (not 250k mind you) with out so much as an associates degree, yet I'd still cough up a full blown 10% tax increase to help my fellow American, it sucks that I'm in the minority tho . And damn straight that'd hurt my bottom line :\, I'd still do it, I'd vote for it, willingly
To stay on target as once popular Star Wars guy said,
Iowa is next, unions are about to be busted there too. Only took one day. Takers on whos next? MI is right around the corner, but I'm thinking maybe Cali.
ClakarEQ wrote:Many of you are just fools that only see the smoke in mirrors and can't see what's really happening here. Reps want control of your ability to earn, your ability to reproduce, your ability to follow religion of choice, your ability to have sexual preference, the ability of what you do or don't do in your free time, etc. If they even get half of what they want, we are doomed as a nation, and frankly it's already too late.
If you want this nation fixed, you are going to have to face the fact the it is our private sector that has doomed us all. These raindrops you all try to catch and say "here, this is the problem" is just that, a fucking rain drop. You fail to look and see it is the private sector river flowing down that will drown us all.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests