by Menelvir » Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:38 pm
Watching it, I can't help but feel like I'm being spoken down to, possibly because I'm too stupid or ignorant to reach certain conclusions on my own merits.
It doesn't help that the lecture is sprinkled with phrases in Hebrew, and numerous references to Judaic tradition and/or history, which enhances my feeling of stupidity, because I have no reference point for them. At that point, I literally have no idea what he's talking about.
But it seems to me this is standard operating procedure for religions institutions -- stupid masses need to receive the godspell (literally, "good story") through the teachings of a learned few who have access to it in a way that commonfolk do not.
It is a one-sided event -- even when the speaker asks questions (e.g. "which is closer to me, the man or the phone", which struck me as a rather blatantly obvious semantic trick) it isn't really a conversation -- he's only interested in hearing the trivial answer ("the phone") so that he can then rebut that common sense answer. This privileges his revelatory exposition and brings the audience closer to an understanding of Truth.
I prefer genuine dialogue or the dialectic.
I did rather like his references to "I am prayer", "state of prayer", which reminded me a little of Zazen.
But on the whole it was a little too metaphorical, the manner of speech a bit too preachy, for me to watch it in its entirety. Thanks for sharing, though.
"People take different roads seeking fulfillment and happiness. Just because they're not on your road doesn't mean they've gotten lost." - The Dalai Lama