http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brooke-so ... 37294.html
First piece is from a lesbian who thinks the LGBT community should lighten up on straight people who ask very personal questions about their sexuality and use those moments as "teachable" moments.
https://dorimooneyham.wordpress.com/201 ... ht-people/
Second piece is a rebuttal of the first piece which accuses the writer of marginalizing real issues of the community.
Personally I see where the first writer was going with her piece. I think it was well intentioned and I think that going at things calmly rather than angrily is always the best way to go. I see it as saying, "let's be more inclusive" and I agree with that much.
Second piece comes off real cunty at first...well, tbh real cunty all the way through, but I do agree with a lot of bullets that she makes that being more inclusive and welcoming and letting things go does serve, to some extent, to marginalize issues that are still prevalent in their community.
Thoughts?
PS - It's a decent amount of reading
PPS - I picked this topic because I felt it would be fairly divided amongst our group
PPPS - Hello