Moderator: Dictators in Training
leah wrote:i am forever grateful to my gym teacher for drilling that skill into me during drivers' ed
leah wrote:isn't the only difference the length? i feel like it would take too long to smoke something that long, ha.
Adivina wrote:We are the most bipolar acting community, bunch of manics with the mood swings on here.
brinstar wrote:give three reasons it was a good thing without using something trump already said about it
betcha cain't
It brings the governance of the UK into line with what the majority of the population want. Before you had a situation where all of the main parties were against Brexit, and a small majority of the population for it. That was clearly wrong, and was poisoning UK politics, leading to more and more extreme views on left and right. So Brexit might end or reverse that trend.
It begins to re-democratise the UK. Fewer life changing decisions will be made by INSEAD educated, unelected bureaucrats who think they they “know best” and have the mandate to impose their own political agenda irrespective of what the public actually wants. Thus Brexit might make our lawmakers more directly accountable.
It might relieve the pressure on the UK housing market, and lead to a sustained fall in UK house prices bringing them back to historically normal levels relative to earnings (down 35% ideally). Thus brexit might make home ownership possible for ordinary young people again.
It might be good for UK exporters who export to areas other than the EU, whom are the majority, if sterling weakens.
It might lead to a tightening of the labour market, and lead to increases in real wages, in particular for unskilled and semi-skilled workers.
It might lead to a reduction in red tape, especially for smaller businesses, leading to improved profitability and investment. Smaller businesses employ 80% of the workforce, so this is not unimportant.
It might, due to increased revenues from import duties and the cessation of contributions to the EU budget, lead to an increase in tax revenues, allowing for either more spending on public services or a reduced national debt.
It might encourage investment banks to move out of London, which might reduce the corruption which has become endemic in the capital (currently run as a concierge service for the worlds richest thieves), make the UK economy more balanced and reduce income inequality.
It might give the Scottish people the chance to be independent again. Most Scottish people and many English people feel that this, and localism in general, is a good thing.
Drem wrote:"a quick internet search"
do you have any ideas of your own?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests