Page 5 of 5

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 9:45 am
by Harrison
RUH ROH I'm almost back up to 100goats!

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 9:47 am
by vonkaar
It's a long way to go... can only gain so many per hour. I'm telling you, I already won. BELIEVE IT.

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 9:49 am
by Harrison
Image

THANKS FOR THE UPDATE

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 9:54 am
by Insanityfair
vonkaar wrote:
Insanityfair wrote::eesdl: ?


That most CERTAINLY is 'my' emote... for reasons STFU I HATE YOU, THINGS WILL GET BETTER DAMNIT.



Not a shot, sir. Also, the many forms of --> :pirateparty: emotes, I would assume belong to you also.

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:03 am
by vonkaar
I only claim :eesdl: and :banghead: whenever FinawHINE (AHAHA GET IT?) uses it.

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:12 am
by Harrison
Never used the first one.

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 11:36 am
by Narrock
Martrae wrote:
Mindia wrote:
Diekan wrote:fuck you tikker! i am going to drive up to canaDUH and kick your ass!!11!!!


Funny how people who act the toughest on the internetz usually aren't IrL.


That was quite possibly the most foolish and insanely "geeky" post Brinstar ever made. The classic internet tough-guy routine always make me :teehee:



Try looking at the name of the poster next time.


OMG Martrae. Yes, I know... but Diekan was making fun of what Brinstar wrote earlier. I'm beginning to wonder about your comprehension skillz...
C'mon Martrae have a giggle.

Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 11:38 am
by Narrock
Harrison wrote:I think he was commenting on the original post diekan was spoofing on.

Again, it's a stretch given the source, but it's how I saw it.


You actually saw correctly Harriwin.

Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 8:21 pm
by Captain Insano
Mindia wrote:
KaiineTN wrote:What's wrong with making a movie that shows more of the history of Christianity? Regardless of the purpose behind making "Passion," it did display too much negativity towards other religions. Films like these should be more neutral - allowing people to fully understand where each side is coming from, imo, but that is the responsibility of the writers and directors, and it certainly didn't help that Gibson is an overly religious nutcase.

I'm really looking forward to seeing Kingdom of Heaven... I have a feeling it will hold more of a neutral religious standpoint and hopefully will display what happened on both sides in a way that wont make you judge one as right and just, and the other as wrong and evil.

When it comes to faith and beliefs, no one can be wrong, because they are individual and are not made from facts.


lol OmG you're missing the point again. It's the reason why Spielberg is allegedly working on this movie. We all know Christianity had a dark side to it at one time, but that's not what this argument is about... it's about a retaliatory movie in response to Gibson's "Passion." That is what I'm talking about. Sounds to me like Spielberg has a guilty conscience (although he shouldn't) and this is his way of lashing out irrationally. Just makes him look like an immature loser.



I think this is great. I say make movies about how all the organized religions are a crock and maybe people will stop wasting time at church. There would be a lot less war, strife and hate if organized religion wasn't taken so seriously.