Page 6 of 7

Posted: Mon May 01, 2006 9:58 pm
by Tikker
I can't understand you with my cock in your mouth

Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 3:27 am
by Tuggan
what? no complaints about poor officiating, or bullshit goals all of a sudden?

Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 9:31 am
by ClakarEQ
That game last night sucked for true. That tie up goal was shit tikker and you know it, not only did the high stick not get called but BS that he didn't kick it in. He kicked it you could see it happen.

In the end it may not have mattered because they would have gone into OT and maybe lost anyway. But that tie up goal was a bad ref call. Looks like I'm back to EQ on hockey night LOL

Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 12:25 pm
by Tikker
ClakarEQ wrote:That game last night sucked for true. That tie up goal was shit tikker and you know it, not only did the high stick not get called but BS that he didn't kick it in. He kicked it you could see it happen.

In the end it may not have mattered because they would have gone into OT and maybe lost anyway. But that tie up goal was a bad ref call. Looks like I'm back to EQ on hockey night LOL


eh, it wasn't a high stick

if the puck is lower than his shoulder when he makes contact, it's playable

the over the crossbar thing is only applied if the puck is directed into the net

watching the replay, it looked more like the detroit guy pushed it into the net
lemme see if I can find a pic of it

Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 10:53 pm
by Xaiveir
To me on the replay looked like the puck was pushed in..not kicked. The puck was in his midsection when he was hit, and as it dropped he was pushed into the net, the puck fell and might have hit a skate, but it has to be a kicking motion for it to be overturned.

There was no diffiniative view of a "kicking motion" so good no overturn by the refs imho. I was actually rooting for Detroit too.

Posted: Tue May 02, 2006 11:19 pm
by Arlos
Didn't look like a kick to me either, and I didn't care either way who won. You honestly think a video ref would overlook a blatant call, when he knows the review is going to get looked at by Bettman later? They want to keep working, so they ain't THAT dumb.

-Arlos

Posted: Wed May 03, 2006 1:20 am
by Narrock

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 3:10 am
by Tuggan
so much for that unbeatable kipper.

goin with SJ now.

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 8:02 am
by Tikker
Kiprusoff wasn't that bad


no matter how good a goalie is, you're never going to win scoring a goal every other game

I was actually pretty impressed with Anaheim, they outworked Calgary, which is pretty hard to do

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 10:46 am
by Phlegm
It was interesting to see the top 4 seeds in the east made it to the second round while in the West the bottom 4 won their series. I guessed there are more parity in the west than the east.

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 10:48 am
by Phlegm
Second Round:

Sabres vs. Senators
Devils vs. Hurricanes


Oilers vs. Sharks
Avalanches vs. Ducks.

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 10:50 am
by Snero
sens vs devils and sharks vs avs in the conferance finals

although, damn an oilers vs sens final would rock

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 10:57 am
by Phlegm
Snero wrote:an oilers vs sens final would rock



When was the last time a Canadian team won the cup?

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 11:01 am
by Snero
habs won in 92? vancouver has never won, edmonton was mid or late 80s too, leafs well, HAHAHAHAHAH keep dreaming, calgary won in 88 I think it was

sens haven't been around long

must be the habs in the early 90s

edit: i read this somewhere, the habs have won a cup in every decade since the NHL started, they have another few years left to win in the 2000s

Posted: Thu May 04, 2006 11:20 am
by Tikker
Candiens won 93 cup,86
oilers won in 90,88,87,85,84
flames won 89

Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 8:09 pm
by Phlegm
Exciting game tonight between Ottowa and Buffalo. The Sabres won in overtime 7 - 6. They scored 18 seconds into the overtime on a turnover.

Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 9:20 pm
by Tikker
Phlegm wrote:Exciting game tonight between Ottowa and Buffalo. The Sabres won in overtime 7 - 6. They scored 18 seconds into the overtime on a turnover.


that was one of the sloppiest games i've seen in a long time

was like a preseason game with tons of AHL guys and rookies, jeje

Posted: Fri May 05, 2006 9:43 pm
by Phlegm
The Ducks are kicking the Avalanches' asses, 4 - 0 at the end of the second period.

Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:20 pm
by Tuggan
So will Edmonton go back to their game tonight, or will they keep up the trap against SJ like they did against the Wings?

Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:30 pm
by Phlegm
Tuggan wrote:So will Edmonton go back to their game tonight, or will they keep up the trap against SJ like they did against the Wings?


I think they will go back to their game since the Sharks is mostly a dump and chase team while the Red Wings is a possession team.

Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 4:33 pm
by Phlegm
The Ducks won again. Their goalie, Bryzgalov, is red hot. He now has three shutouts in a row.

Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 6:54 pm
by Tikker
I honestly can't believe how wel the ducks are playing

Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 9:27 pm
by Arlos
Western Conference Finals are going to be an all-California battle.

-Arlos

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 3:03 am
by Tuggan
the edmonton/sj game was actually fun to watch.

Posted: Mon May 08, 2006 6:54 am
by Tikker
if the rest of the series is that good, I almost don't care the outcome


although, I'd like to see a little more 1/3 periods, and less 2nd period