namelesstavern.net

Lol holy shit, when are you idiots going to stop saying following someone is the equivalent of jumping on top of someone and bashing their head into the pavement?

You people are so out of touch with reality it's almost disgusting. What world do you monkeys live in?

Harrison wrote:You people are so out of touch with reality it's almost disgusting. What world do you monkeys live in?

Well in this we agree, the reality you live in is very different from our own.

I don't want to live in the mongoloid ridden shithole you guys live where violently jumping on top of someone and bashing their skull into the pavement is a proper response to "being followed", but defending yourself from such, is wrong.

Reynaldo wrote:I disagree.

I think if the tables were 100% reversed, there wouldn't even be a trial right now because if TM had shot GZ in self defense, there wouldn't have been the public outcry from the black community and TM would have walked based on original evidence based on the laws in place, just like GZ did and all this would be forgotten by now.

In the end, as Drem says, the prosecution was just overzealous with the murder charge and botched the whole thing, much like the Casey Anthony trial a couple years back, who also walked afterwards.

You can't compare this to the Casey Anthony case at all. That was a slam dunk case the prosecution should have easily won. This one never should have went to trial based on their stupid 'Stand your Ground' law.

I think the problem is this was over sensationalized by the media, which is why it was brought to trial. It has nothing to do with the 'black' community or racism, but simple pressure from people in power and via news organizations.

Harrison wrote:I don't want to live in the mongoloid ridden shithole you guys live where violently jumping on top of someone and bashing their skull into the pavement is a proper response to "being followed", but defending yourself from such, is wrong.

Don't you have any empathy for the 17 year old who was killed? He was a stupid kid, but did he deserve to die for freaking out over a guy stalking him in a high crime neighborhood at night? I think he should have gotten in trouble for assault and battery, but he was killed. It's disturbing you seem to justify taking his life for getting into a fight with a guy 'creeping' him out.

Beating a guy up that was creeping him out his a best case scenario. We don't know what Zimmerman said or did to him. He very well could have thought his life was in danger. Why would someone jump someone else with eye witnesses around and smash his face into the pavement simply because someone was walking behind him. Doesn't hold water to me. I think now that most of this has come to light, it's not as inflammatory as original believed, but I think even the most hardheaded can see how Zimmerman was completely reckless in his behaviour, which ultimately ended someones life.

Harri just has hero worship because he dreams of killing dangerous minorities.

Zanchief wrote:He very well could have thought his life was in danger.

this is what mungo refuses to consider: it's not simply "following"

if i'm walking alone at night and a stocky dude comes after me you're damn right i'm gonna be concerned for my own well-being

anyone in the world in that situation instantly goes fight-or-flight, guaranteed

should TM have chosen flight? obviously, not least because he surely could've outrun that stubby-limbed wad OR because said wad was actually a police academy flunkie with a chip on his shoulder and a raging gunboner. but ignoring the fact that GZ's actions triggered a f/f response in the first place is just plain idiotic

If you're put into "fight or flight" by someone following you at night, you must live in constant fear, or you're a paranoid psycho.

If I rounded on and savagely beat everyone who ever followed me in my city at night, I'd be in jail or dead.

Stop trying to justify self defense from a violent act with a disproportionate violent response to being followed. You're smarter than that. Though, evidence in this thread seems to disagree with such for most of you.

Here you go assuming something you have no knowledge of. You assume Martin beat someone up simply for following him even though Zimmermen sought consent from a 911 operator to escalate the conflict. You think after he hung up he did nothing and then just happened to get beat up by a man he intented to do harm to? That's your theory you think holds water?

I'd say you are smarter then that, but I think anyone who's ever had any dealings with you, either virtual or real, knows you're a man of limited intelligence, so we can all just shake our heads and say "that's our harri".

Tikker wrote:That Trayvon Martin thing is beyond ridiculous

guy stalked him down to shoot him

You're stupid beyond repair.

I'm here to collect the tears of people upset that the law was upheld rather than fall victim to media outcry for blood in a legal self-defense shooting.

no tears here, retards

ALEC strikes again, end of story

I'm gonna move to Florida and start following little kids around and then, when i start losing the fights i instigate, i'll just kill them

Might even sire some children and kill em off and lie about that, while i'm at it

All of this is apparently justifiably legal there

Thats the law bro so when in rome I guess

He should've gotten involuntary manslaughter at least. In other news a woman who fired a warning shot at her abusive husband who she had a protective order against is looking at a possible 20 years. Stand your ground didn't hold water there and she's up for attempted murder. Goes to show that the message in this country is shoot to kill.

I see Jay gets his news from chain letters on Facebook, lol.

Drem wrote:I'm gonna move to Florida and start following little kids around and then, when i start losing the fights i instigate, i'll just kill them

Might even sire some children and kill em off and lie about that, while i'm at it

All of this is apparently justifiably legal there

"little kids" lol

17 year-old, 6'3"

"little kid"

Lol.

boy this whole thing was quite the wet dream for racist gunfags eh

Here in the real world, somewhere you obviously don't reside, it had nothing to do with race.

It had to do with the law not being controlled by the media.

Jay wrote:He should've gotten involuntary manslaughter at least. In other news a woman who fired a warning shot at her abusive husband who she had a protective order against is looking at a possible 20 years. Stand your ground didn't hold water there and she's up for attempted murder. Goes to show that the message in this country is shoot to kill.

There was a guy here in Oregon that fired a warning shot (he was ex-military) at a burglar attempting to enter his house, and the police charged him with reckless use of a weapon and took his ar-15. Shoot to kill, indeed. Pretty sad

Harrison wrote:it had nothing to do with race

i know that, moron, or have you forgotten the half dozen different times i reminded you i don't think this was about race?

but as a racist gunfag, you are on cloud nine

two different concepts, try to keep up

Well, it's about race in that if Treyvon had been white, asian, hispanic, etc. Zimmerman would never have followed him and created the confrontation in the first place.

I still think it's ludicrous that I could walk into a bar, hit on some guy's girl, pick a fight with him, start losing, and then pull out a gun and shoot him dead because I now "fear for my life", and that's legal. Insanity.

-Arlos

The only thing that race changes about this is that if it were any other race we wouldn't have heard about it.

Yeah. I'm "racist", but I'm the one who doesn't give two shits about either of their ethnicity. Let that sink in.

no, you have a hardon for this case because you believed it to have something to do with your precious gun rights

that it was a black kid is just icing

Funny you're the one that doesn't care about race, yet you're the first one to bring up the fact that Zimmerman is hispanic and not white. Let that sink in.