namelesstavern.net

Aatrex wrote:Perhaps you'd like to post some facts of what our cowardice consisted of instead of your liberal mantra and one line quips?

feel free to point out anywhere that cowardice was mentioned

ps, calling any opposing viewpoint "liberal" is retarded

Tikker wrote:

I'm sorry about our waffling on Iraq. I mean, when you're going up against a crazed dictator, you want to have your friends by your side. I realize it took more than two years before you guys pitched in against Hitler, but that was different. Everyone knew he had weapons.

I read that as you saying we don't want to get into it = cowardice.


Oh, and it's not that your viewpoint is opposing mine that I called it liberal. It's the fact that I view you as a liberal.

it's kinda sad how every argument on the NT seems to degenerate into liberals vs conservatives, every if political stances had absolutely nothing to do with it.

It's the hatfields vs the mccoys, everybody seems to be either in one camp or the other and theres no middle ground. Everybody on one side blindly follows their leaders and blindly attacks the other guy, and vice versa

Go Habs Go!!!!

Snero wrote:it's kinda sad how every argument on the NT seems to degenerate into liberals vs conservatives, every if political stances had absolutely nothing to do with it.

It's the hatfields vs the mccoys, everybody seems to be either in one camp or the other and theres no middle ground. Everybody on one side blindly follows their leaders and blindly attacks the other guy, and vice versa

yeah I agree, sorry!

Aatrex wrote: It's the fact that I view you as a liberal.

I'm a liberal?
that's news to me

That's why I said I view you as one, which I do, not that you are one. There's a difference~

oic


for the record

pointing out that it took the US 2 years to enter WW2 had nothing to do with cowardice

it was more just a fact kind of thing

ps, that quote is just part of a longer satirical rant

kk very well then

ps, what the heck makes me a liberal?

just the fact that I'm not a republican?

Tikker wrote:oic


for the record

pointing out that it took the US 2 years to enter WW2 had nothing to do with cowardice

it was more just a fact kind of thing

ps, that quote is just part of a longer satirical rant

The US was more of an isolationist country back then. Because of that great big body of water seperating us from Europe we weren't as quick to jump in the fight.

that and the money to be made selling weapons

that and selling weapons to both sides

Diekan wrote:

Tikker wrote:oic


for the record

pointing out that it took the US 2 years to enter WW2 had nothing to do with cowardice

it was more just a fact kind of thing

ps, that quote is just part of a longer satirical rant

The US was more of an isolationist country back then. Because of that great big body of water seperating us from Europe we weren't as quick to jump in the fight.

Where as Canada had giant bridges connecting the two Continents.

Zanchief wrote:

Diekan wrote:

Tikker wrote:oic


for the record

pointing out that it took the US 2 years to enter WW2 had nothing to do with cowardice

it was more just a fact kind of thing

ps, that quote is just part of a longer satirical rant

The US was more of an isolationist country back then. Because of that great big body of water seperating us from Europe we weren't as quick to jump in the fight.

Where as Canada had giant bridges connecting the two Continents.

Kapowie! And Zanchief chalks up another point for the Canucks!

you had giant bridges? shit we could have used those..Fucking Canadians

LionKing wrote:

Tikker wrote:if by everyone you mean especially the US, then sure

/props to your canadian military for doing such a fine job babysitting King George VI and his mommy Queen Mary during WWII. Glad you syrup heads could help.

lol PWNED

We pretty much won WWII... The only people who really helped were the English and Russians. The 10 mounties and the crates of pancakes with syrup that the Canucks contributed doesn't even deserve to be in the history books.

if you're trying to be funny, you missed the mark

Canada lost approx 45,000 Military personal during WW2. I think that amounts to a hell of alot more than 10 mounties and some pancakes. Your attempt at being funny should be saved for other threads where humor is needed

Stalin killed more than 45,000 people before he got out of bed every morning.

Zanchief wrote:Where as Canada had giant bridges connecting the two Continents.

Well, Canada had much closer ties and was previously subject to British rule.
This is why much of what Canada did was to augment the UK forces.

Anyone trying to mock Canada or the US contribution to WWII is being silly. Both countries made great sacrifices and both were important to winning the war.

The US had 16 million people fighting and lost over 400,000 troops.

Canada had 1.5 Million people serving and lost 45,000 troops. Per Capita, Canada sent more people than the US.

Aatrex wrote:Stalin killed more than 45,000 people before he got out of bed every morning.

now thats how I would like to start my breakfast every morning...by executing people who deserve it.

captain_insano wrote:

Aatrex wrote:Stalin killed more than 45,000 people before he got out of bed every morning.

now thats how I would like to start my breakfast every morning...by executing people who deserve it.

lawl

Basically North America kicked ass in WWII