namelesstavern.net

Narrock wrote:

spazz wrote:I dont claim to be one thing and act another way like you do mate.

Neither do I. What's your point?

I hope that was in jest.

I have no idea what you're talking about.

everyone else does

brinstar wrote:everyone else does

lol riiight

ask em

Last night on Conan O Brien, They did a "In the year 2000" skit, and Ann Coulter was brought up, and I laughed my ass off. Trying to remember what exactly was said. Something about Ann Coulter will spark her biggest controversy ever by "someone stupid being good as something". I will have to see if I can find any soundbites.

I was watching old SNL episodes and they had a couple Ann skits. Quite funny.

Are you thirsty? Well how about some traitor-aid?

I got one wrong, of course I've read all her books save the latest and I'm part way though that, so it's not surprising to me that I nailed most of them.

Were they literary adventures?

300 pages of the waaah-mbulance driving by

Thats a stupid Quiz, you don't even have to really know who said what, all you have to look at is what words they use. Some broad from 2000s is not gonna be using the same words as some crazy asshole in 1930s.

Drem wrote:Were they literary adventures?

They are by no means on par with great classical works if that's what you are asking lol. I read them for entertainment for the most part, and take them as such. Her ideas, arguments and general mode of argument are pretty extreme, very similar to her counterparts on the other side of the political spectrum.

brinstar wrote:300 pages of the waaah-mbulance driving by

Pretty much I guess, although to be fair I'd say the same thing about similar extreme liberal authors. If you take what is said by these pit bull style authors on either side of the fence as gospel you are really allowing your self to be mislead by your own bend of political bias. At the base they have some facts and some valid arguments, but they are taken to an extreme, and if you are to remain objective and reasonable about things, you can't take either sides political "attack dogs" at 100 percent face value. I have to admit though to date the best laugh I've had with anything in the general genre we are talking has to have been the monkey scene in M. Moores Farenhieght 9/11... But then again Coulter hasn't done a video documentary, perhaps she should, although the reactions would probably be more entertaining then a documentary it's self.

Lueyen wrote:

Drem wrote:Were they literary adventures?

They are by no means on par with great classical works if that's what you are asking lol. I read them for entertainment for the most part, and take them as such. Her ideas, arguments and general mode of argument are pretty extreme, very similar to her counterparts on the other side of the political spectrum.

brinstar wrote:300 pages of the waaah-mbulance driving by

Pretty much I guess, although to be fair I'd say the same thing about similar extreme liberal authors. If you take what is said by these pit bull style authors on either side of the fence as gospel you are really allowing your self to be mislead by your own bend of political bias. At the base they have some facts and some valid arguments, but they are taken to an extreme, and if you are to remain objective and reasonable about things, you can't take either sides political "attack dogs" at 100 percent face value. I have to admit though to date the best laugh I've had with anything in the general genre we are talking has to have been the monkey scene in M. Moores Farenhieght 9/11... But then again Coulter hasn't done a video documentary, perhaps she should, although the reactions would probably be more entertaining then a documentary it's self.

OMFG you are the most sensible person on this board.

Lueyen wrote:But then again Coulter hasn't done a video documentary, perhaps she should, although the reactions would probably be more entertaining then a documentary it's self.

Oh I think the farce surrounding the release of Fahrenheit 911 was stupid enough already.