Page 2 of 19
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 1:31 pm
by Tikker
i'm sure if you took 8 seconds to google it, instead of talking out of your ass like usual, you'd be able to easily verify what I'm saying
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:42 pm
by Tossica
Tikker wrote:i'm sure if you took 8 seconds to google it, instead of talking out of your ass like usual, you'd be able to easily verify what I'm saying
Sony only owns about 20% of MGM at this point and lost the distribution rights to most of the catalog to Fox. Now Fox is still a strong supporter of Blu-Ray but will definitely release titles on HD-DVD if Blu-Ray fails to pull the market share Sony promised as will Disney and their other "exclusive" studios.
So, NO, they don't own "40% of ALL source material" There is a lot of money tied up in the catalog and the actual owners of that material are not stupid enough to lock out profit opportunities outside of Blu-Ray if the format falls flat.
Sorry your google quip failed you, asstalker.
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:51 pm
by Harrison
The only one here not using sources for their information is you. The only "asstalker" appears to be the one fabricating bullshit from thin air.
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:12 pm
by Tossica
Google it.
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 7:07 pm
by Ginzburgh
Google what? Who owns most of the HD market? The answer is Blue Ray with almost 70%.
Unlike you, I have the luxury of looking at it objectively, considering I dont own a Blue- Ray or HD-DVD player.
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 5:03 am
by Kaemon
Find the company that will make a player that will support, Blu-ray, HD-DVD, SD before it hits the shelves and invest in that company. Your stock will double a week after it hits the shelves and triple during Xmas season.
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:27 am
by Tossica
Ginzburgh wrote:Google what? Who owns most of the HD market? The answer is Blue Ray with almost 70%.
Unlike you, I have the luxury of looking at it objectively, considering I dont own a Blue- Ray or HD-DVD player.
What market?
That's the thing. Sony would like everyone to think that the "war" is over but it hasn't even begun yet.
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 2:34 pm
by Tossica
Kaemon wrote:Find the company that will make a player that will support, Blu-ray, HD-DVD, SD before it hits the shelves and invest in that company. Your stock will double a week after it hits the shelves and triple during Xmas season.
The players are already out but cost $1000.
Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:48 pm
by Tikker
i kinda suspect that blu-ray and hd-dvd are just interim standards and something else will come along that will finally solve the issue of competing standards
specifically, I think the days of hard coded media are almost over
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:05 am
by Ginzburgh
What market?
/sigh...the same market you would have cited if 70% of high def dvd owners purchased HD-DVD instead of Blue-Ray. Way to play stupid though.
The players are already out but cost $1000.
And a friend of mine has one of these players. The only drawback is, you can't access the special features menus of the HD-DVDs. Go figure.
i kinda suspect that blu-ray and hd-dvd are just interim standards and something else will come along that will finally solve the issue of competing standards
specifically, I think the days of hard coded media are almost over
It's Jumanji time baby!
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:29 pm
by dammuzis
your both wrong
neither hd-dvd nor blu ray will win the "war"
downloadable content will
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:24 pm
by Ginzburgh
As soon as they can cram that much information into a download that takes only a few minutes, sure.
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:13 pm
by Tikker
Ginzburgh wrote:As soon as they can cram that much information into a download that takes only a few minutes, sure.
it's more about having the pipes to support that much content
I know here we're trialling 100mbps symmetrical ftth
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:13 pm
by Gaazy
Can you really tell THAT big of a difference from normal damn DVDs? Even if you could, im still going to stick to good ole DVDs. There cant be that much of a damn difference in them to make me want to spend that much money or to sit here and bicker like girls about it
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:21 pm
by Ouchyfish
Gaazy wrote:Can you really tell THAT big of a difference from normal damn DVDs? Even if you could, im still going to stick to good ole DVDs. There cant be that much of a damn difference in them to make me want to spend that much money or to sit here and bicker like girls about it
I am all about video game sales. All these fuckers with complete absence of creativity require their video games to be as real as you and me. So, to be successful, you need more detail, to handle more detail, you need more data, to handle more data, you need more data capacity.
That is the only thing I give a shit about when it comes to this. "What's going to sell more?"
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:27 pm
by Gaazy
Yeah, I guess someday I'll have to see it for myself. I'll eventually catch it on someone elses stuff, but theres no way im spending that kind of money for prettier shit on TV. Ive got more important to soend money on.
But I guess to each his own. To some people its like a hobby or something. They spend money on TV accessories, and I go buy fourwheelers and stuff

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:39 pm
by Tossica
Gaazy wrote:Can you really tell THAT big of a difference from normal damn DVDs? Even if you could, im still going to stick to good ole DVDs. There cant be that much of a damn difference in them to make me want to spend that much money or to sit here and bicker like girls about it
If you don't have a high def TV then there's no point. If you own a high def TV, then you are not doing it justice buy watching standard def DVD. Whether it's THAT big a difference is debatable but it's big enough to be worth it to me.
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:56 pm
by Gaazy
Ah, maybe ill look into someday when its not so expensive. Just seems so damn high priced =/
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:59 pm
by Tossica
Gaazy wrote:Ah, maybe ill look into someday when its not so expensive. Just seems so damn high priced =/
$200 for a player and 8 movies? Doesn't seem that bad to me. The disks are still pretty spendy at Best Buy and places like that but from Amazon, most releases are $20.
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:04 pm
by Gaazy
I thought you gu ys said it was 1000?
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:08 pm
by Gaazy
Ignore me, Im tired and i think i misread~
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 11:24 pm
by Tikker
Gaazy wrote:Can you really tell THAT big of a difference from normal damn DVDs? Even if you could, im still going to stick to good ole DVDs. There cant be that much of a damn difference in them to make me want to spend that much money or to sit here and bicker like girls about it
there's not a HUGE difference between HD-DVD and a good upscaling dvd player
the difference is there if you're amazingly picky, but it's not like going from VHS to DVD (imo)
the only real place I REALLY notice the difference in HD is in sports broadcasts
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 11:46 pm
by Gaazy
Yeah ill agree with that, football on a big High def TV is the SHIT. Add a nice big audio system in there and you're set every weekend
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:04 am
by Tikker
i notice it in football quite a bit, but hockey the change is phenomenal
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:35 am
by Ginzburgh
Yeah and American Idol in HD is just magnificent.